so ... syria is next on the list.
 

... I am pretty much sure that the only country that has weapons of mass destructions in the middle east region is israel ...

Israel has a very strong defense.

They could have taken care of Iraq in 2 days, not 3 weeks.

Hi Marty,

The US could have taken care of Iraq in one day. It's all a matter of what you consider "taken care of" to mean.

Absolutely, but somehow I doubt Israel will ever appear on the list

US owns all. Case closed.

Yes, looks that way unfornately.

I guess that NONE of the world leaders today have heard that one man or woman can rule the ENTIRE world.

How many times has someone tried this in history?, it just aint possible....

my 2 predictions:

1) we will not fight any wars withing 12 months

2) we won't fight neither Syria nor North Korea in the next 3 years

we have achieved all intermidiate goals by crushing Hussein

keep in mind, that you guys need direct access to the mediteranian sea ... syria would be the cheapest sollution here.

.. as of north korea, I pretty much agree with you, I wouldn´t fight someone that could strike back either ...

The only difference is that the US has moral obligations.

Israel could have nuked the shit out of Iraq before breakfast without anyone complaining.

:thumbsup Got Oil? :thumbsup

Why would North Korea be an US problem.

Wouldn't Russia, China and Japan have more to say on that subject?

Funkmaster,
Israel provides all access to Medeteranean sea we need, along with Turkey and Greece and Italy,
we just don't wanna fight another arab country, thus confirming something what everybody suspect already-
we do not trust/like arabs
;-)))

as for North Korea's responce,
only in their dreams they can respond with what's left after the first strike we can inflict.
The reason we don't wanna go in NK is we don't wanna spread ourselves thin all over the globe,
too expensive and NK is a bigger threat to Russia and China than to USA..

"Don't use cannon to kill moscito"
(--Confucy)

...especially when moscito is not bothering you
;-)))

JINX!
;'-)))

North Korea would fall just like Iraq, it just would of took 2 months instead of one month.

There military technology is pretty much the same as Iraq's
Notice how they chilled out once they seen how Iraq was overcome to fast.

I don't think we gonna attack syria anytime soon(next five years or so). Just putting they heat on them so they won't fuck with the US.

I don't see any country using the nukes first for the forseable future....but terrorists are NOT a country,
they will be the ones to use nukes first,
my unfortunate prediction

it won't take 2 months...
Iraq was dealt with "kids gloves", as they do not have nukes, as far as we knew.

NK is another story and the strike against them would have been much stronger,
IMHO

You think Israel could pre-emptively nuke Baghdad without anyone complaining? I'd complain. You?

I agree! 3733t Am3ricans.

I would have complained....

"Ad lices Yovi, non lices bovie" and Israel ain't Yovi.

These embedded reporters have served to show the entire world just how potent the US military is. Much of this footage is aimed directly at countries like N Korea ... a little message to say "settle the fuck down".

exactly,, ppl saying that this war will cause more unstability. but i think it did total opposite. any dictator that wants to stay in power better bow down or risk another regime change with the quickness

edit:

Bush is an arrogant bastard that uses a false patriotism theme to build his personal wealth with an old "FUCK THE PROLITARIATE" type of mentality. If you back bush you could be the cause of the death of the porn industry, Take a good look at what this adminisrtation is doing as a whole, not with just a lets kick some ass! in mind. Look @ the economy, the industry, weed smokin laws, the oppresive trampling of our constitutional rights... Remember who Hired John Ashhahahahaha....

Fuck the proletariat,
joeshmo,
and the rest of mofo's whose best interest are best served flipping burgers for the rest of their lives.

whoi needs bleeding PMS liberals anyway?

that's the way you want it to be... I'd say the terrorist organizations will try a revenge....remember they don't give a shit about thier life... so expect some suicide bombings soon...

....in Romania
;-)))

'there is no list.'...

are you trying to bend it? :winkwink:

bend it? just quoting Powell.

'There is no list, only an agenda.'

:1orglaugh

from another thread.

'Iran, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Cuba, North Korea, and Sudan continue to be the seven governments that the US Secretary of State has designated as state sponsors of international terrorism. '

http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/pgtrpt/2000/2441.htm

written in 2000

the list was stated years ago, why do you guys bring it up now?

I agree with the patriotism part, too much patriotism is not good.

Bush should try to create a better economy in steading of wasting billions of $$$ on war.

Starting another war straight after the Iraq war would be a stupid mistake

ah ha..I was quoting some un-named kid in The Matrix

:winkwink: I hope that you are not an ashhahahahahas list when he decides to link porn to terrorist funding, caz he will want someone big and rich like you to use as an example, and then the cycle starts over .....

Lordy... You guys need to do some real reading...

NK whooped our asses the first round. The only reason we got ahead at one point was because we came in from behind pushed them up to China and then again got our asses kicked back down again which ended the war, more less.

As for NK, they have been dug in and doing so for many years now. NK would not be a 2 month fight but years worth. NK would nuke it's own lands just to kill our Military if we decided to strike.

As for NK weapons, do some research, they are far, far, far more advanced than Saddam. Including nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. As well as a navy and air force of sorts and one really fucking strong ground force that is trained to fight in that land for years and years, and have been doing so for years and years.

If we did invade NK again, what will happen AGAIN when we get to close to China? Think...

As for Syria, I have been to Syria 2 different times and it was not for vacation. Syria has an army of 2.4 million with and started it's nuclear program in 1979. The advantage we have over them is they are broke.

Syria, has weapons, but no money, we won't invade. NK has major fucking weapons but again no money and no real resources that we need, again we won't invade.

syria is a pretty ramshackle hereditary dictatorship for sure.

don't be fooled by the number of soldiers though. iraqi soldiers when given a choice between having the shit bombed out them or going chose to go home.... probably the syrians would do the same.

syria hasn't been able to keep its armed forces current either....

since syria has no oil... i wonder what the anti war peaceniks would say?

Who the fuck said Syria doesnt have oil?

hahah

Im not one of the 'its about oil' hippies, but they clearly have oil.

'Does Syria cooperate with other state sponsors of terrorism?

Yes. Syria and Iran work together over issues related to Hezbollah. Syria also has a complicated relationship with neighboring Iraq, a regional rival governed by another wing of the Baath Party. Syria joined the U.S.-led coalition to drive Iraq out of Kuwait during the 1991 Gulf War, but ties have since warmed somewhat. Syria signed a free trade agreement with Iraq in 2001 and is the primary conduit for Iraqi oil pumped and sold in defiance of U.N. sanctions, thereby providing Saddam Hussein with a large source of illegal income. U.S. pressure on Syria to curtail the flow of Iraqi oil has been unsuccessful.'

http://www.terrorismanswers.com/sponsors/syria.html

Ahh, maybe cause there are 37,000 American military personnel over there protecting South Korea.

<img src=http://www.terrorismanswers.com/images/photos/syria_pic.jpg border="1">

'We have only little oil.'

We would walk all over Syria but at the same time I do think they are stupid enough to try to use chemical weapons.

Syria does have petroleum but they only export $3-4 billion a year so it's small amounts.

Iraq: $12 billion
Kuwait: $15-20 billion

I don't see us going into Syria, at least not any time soon.

Watch closely and mark your calendars guys cuz this only happens once every millenia...

I totally agree with Serge!

hmmm...Oregon is one of the poorest states in the Union and one of the most liberal.

Coincedence? or Cause and Effect?

let me repeat myself, please,
Fuck the Proletariat.

I bet they could do it in under a hour

i thought mississippi was the poorest state in the US on virtually all scales..... and isn't it governed by republicans now?

Fuck you guys who hate the US, we will own you someday and you will be our little bitches.
We are not stopping till we RULE THE WORLD! ahahahahah! :evil-laug

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :thumbsup

I stole that. There's some great ones here:

http://whitehouse.org/initiatives/posters/index.asp

I like these two:

http://whitehouse.org/initiatives/po...ps_for_oil.asp

http://whitehouse.org/initiatives/po...ndi_whitey.asp

:Graucho

at least we allow nude strip clubs with liquor, and we have legal weed too but I am sure your state rocks with all you cool guys in it .... or are you the only one.... it iss funny guys who always liked to watch the other guy do the fighting while they talk about how tough they are caz they know the tuff guy.... they always got their ass kicked where I grew up caz they were patriotic draft dodgers like your tuff guy george... PUSSYS.....and not the kind for lickin ya'all

2-3 nukes and its a good thing right?

I think he was talking about the combined length of , Bush , Ashhahahahaha, and good ole Rummy's penis'