Extreme Associates Busted!
 

The Bush admin. porn crackdown continues...
Extreme Associates Busted!

I don't get it... What did they do wrong? :helpme

hmmm... confused myself here, any more information about this one..?

http://twash.com/temp/huh.gif

hell if I know. It's just porn-bustin' time apparently. What did they do wrong? They probably didn't vote. :feels-hot

http://www.lukeford.com
http://www.simplyjimmyd.com

DynaMite

Only the tip of the iceberg ....

They did some exteme rape stuff didnt they and wasnt he the guy who was saying you wanna come after me come on. I was thinking it seems they are going after the video people and it's the extreme stuff this isnt john and mary fucking, it must be because of using the mail it makes them a target.

i just looked at their website, which i've never visited before... it all fairly mainstream to me really, i'm assuming they are in trouble for the simulated rape stuff, yes..? truly disturbing happenings these days, i'm still shocked that so many here on GFY seem to support the current administration..!

I support anyone who systematically eliminates the competition.

haha, not in the states perhaps punkworld? watch out that they don't decide goth-girls are subversive to good christian sexual practice in the future..!

Wow,

I'm glad we're in Canada.. then again, look what happened to SEG....

I also dont understand these big companies that use the US mail for these things and dont keep track of where to send and not send their shit .

You will hear none of the little pro Bush monkies flapping their lips on this one.

I don't know maybe many of you guys missed it but PBS Frontline did a story about porn a while back and featured these guys in it. They do simulated rape movies, but they even push the lines on the simulated rape by mixing in real violence on the woman who they are going to simulate rape on. The other videos they seized I don't know much about however I suspect it may be something similar or worse. I remember the chic who was helping run the company saying something about the girl doing the rape scene, something like " sure she knows she's going to get her ass beat but then it will be alright and i'm going to take her shopping" it's people like this that push the envelope that cause it to snap back and hit all of us in the fucking face. Legal or not there is something called ethics, integrity or even at the least common fucking sense and most people don't have any of them just like Extreme Associates didn't.

I agree with this prediction....

"You will hear none of the little pro Bush monkies flapping their lips on this one. "


Ill prove you wrong, because you have never been right. Not enough info is out there on this case. And last I checked we dont live under a dictatorship where one man makes every decision.

Go Bush! WHOHO!

looks like they sent some vids to kentucky that upset the bible thumpers

Weee look at me. I support a regime that wants to imprison me for selling sex. Im an idiot.

Who knew Pittsburg carried so much weight!:BangBang:

well said...






and speaking of imprisonment...


I'm amazed when the US talks shit about China's human rights violations, etc (ie., occassionally shooting prisoners so that they may use their organs for experiments or to sell the on the black market...)


yet we live in a society that has the largest prison population in the world, and that it's almost a gaurunteed fact that if you are not 200-300 lbs of raw muscle on steriods when you enter you are going to get forcibly ass raped regularly and probably a good chance of getting AIDS during the attack(s)....


personally I'd rather go to a Chinese prison and take a bullet in the head than go to our 'humane - no cruel and unusual punishment' prisons that we seem to like to grow at a steady pace...


Who's a support of human rights violoations? hmmm


pot calling the kettle black....


"Let's keep those simulated consentual rough-sex videographers from producing more of that consentual sex....and throw them into a REAL ass-raping good time of a joint..."


amazing...

damn straight... something is broken..

what a crock of shit
Larry Flynt is worshipped for pushing the envelope and these guys are chastised....

WE NEED ENEVLOPE PUSHERS

look, if you want to stay vanilla and show nothing more than bikini shots, fine, but it's the fucking envelope pushers that make YOU vanilla and "mainstream"....the mainstream doesn't exist without the extremes....

....and what exactly are "porn ethics"?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

And Tipper Gore fought to censor songs as tame as Twisted Sisters 'were not gonna take it'. :2 cents:

Did she want to put Twisted Sister in prison? I dont recall the PMRC seeking lengthy prison sentences.

Why is everything so black and white to you? Why if you are anti-Bush do you have to be pro Gore? Seriously, thats just some ignorant shit.

I agree. Some people here need to become a bit more familiar with the history of this industry and realize that there is a constant battle at the fringe that affects all of us in the long run.

Currently, there is undeniable evidence of a concerted and very powerful pressure to curtail erotic expression. Being unsupportive of those that are being targetted first, for any reason other than they actually have crossed the line, is suicide. If you allow the definition of "acceptable" creativeness to be forcibly contracted by those that wish to impose their own idea of morality on us, you had better learn to start writing children stories. Because, all too soon, that will become your only option.

Ya smokin 2 much DOPE! That and watching too many Prison Movies, that shit rarely happens in Prison..

well said, and deadly true..

http://twash.com/temp/curly.gif http://twash.com/temp/sven.gif http://twash.com/temp/moe.gif

Why does have to be if you feel war was a valid option you have to be pro bush?


Fuck Bush...Fuck him and his daddy....I didn't vote for either.

I do know history and I suppose there will always be two sides to this arguement that may never come to an agreement. Pushing the envelope to a certain degree is always neccessary however, there almost has to be a line of some sorts and where it is, is truly hard to define. I am not comfortable however with a religious conservative defining the line for me. I think the line holds true at whether or not someone is directly harmed or not, and not indirectly because indirect harm is impossible to control. I don't favor the stance the current administration takes on this issue. However at the same time I don't favor where Extreme Assoc pushed the line in some of their work, not all of it but some of it. I suppose you would have to see it to judge for yourself, I have seen it and found it a bit disturbing. So I understand the implications of pushing the envelope as well as the consequences of this govt setting it's own standards. They set they're standards based on religion and that I do not agree with.