Is bareback always preferable to condom when making content?
 

Is it worth it to make original/exclusive content where the actor is wearing a condom in a scene or is bareback always better? What would you say has more value, a professional scene featuring a really good looking model getting pounded by someone wearing a rubber, or a scene with an average looking woman getting boned bareback?

I have an opportunity to buy exclusive from a better pool of women if I accept some scenes that have condom use, but on the other hand if surfers are turned off watching porns where the guy uses a rubber then that's a lot of money I wasted on a scene.

I read somewhere that video stores (the few left) dont bother selling condom porn anymore because it doesnt sell. Its all condom free.

Unless the condom breaks while fucking, creating a bigger thrill for the seeker, bareback's best for porn, more natural, more naughty & saves messing about for the cumshot & there wouldn't be a creampie :2 cents:

Over 25 years I've heard this question over and over - the answer always seems to be the same. Bareback is always prefered both is straight and gay although there is more awareness in the gay culture of it. People love to blame porn for society not wearing one but in reality - it's society that dictates the production... we shoot what sells.

Bareback. :thumbsup