GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   CNN Reports Reading Wikileaks is Illegal, You Must Get Your Information From CNN (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1221928)

wehateporn 10-16-2016 06:37 AM

CNN Reports Reading Wikileaks is Illegal, You Must Get Your Information From CNN
 
https://streamable.com/6g5v

Joshua G 10-16-2016 06:46 AM

i cant wait for left wing thugs to violently shut down political rallies, censor free speech, & assault people who believe "all lives matter"

oh wait, that already happened. :(

poncabare 10-16-2016 07:03 AM

Hippocrates

Phoenix 10-16-2016 07:57 AM


Sarn 10-16-2016 08:06 AM

http://img0.etsystatic.com/022/2/825...73994_5tmr.jpg

Grapesoda 10-16-2016 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 21225814)

goers well I must get my thinking from BLM :1orglaugh

Coup 10-16-2016 08:34 AM

Remember that Jake Tapper himself makes an appearance in these same leaks. LOL

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4077
Quote:

Need to know asap if we want to offer Jake Tapper questions to ask us.
Quote:

Thanks for facilitating Luis coming on today, and bearing with us through a meelee of GOP nonsense and cancellations and all that. Any particular points he'll want to make? We're gonna stay Dem focused... Thanks! Jason Jason Seher | CNN Writer/Producer | The Lead with Jake Tapper (202) 772-2640 | (856) 979-8021

Vendot 10-16-2016 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 21225952)

I must say she looks convincing.... would a woman who had been assaulted behave like that?

And to be frank, so did Trump in his denial.
He doesn't look like he's lying, if you ask me.

I suppose someone thought that sexual assault against Trump would be more believable once the word got out about his foul mouthing women.

wehateporn 10-16-2016 03:37 PM


Dvae 10-16-2016 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendot (Post 21226021)
I must say she looks convincing.... would a woman who had been assaulted behave like that?

And to be frank, so did Trump in his denial.
He doesn't look like he's lying, if you ask me.

I suppose someone thought that sexual assault against Trump would be more believable once the word got out about his foul mouthing women.

"I flirt more now that I'm married"
Sounds like she came on to him.

Coup 10-16-2016 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 21226549)

Ahaha, fucking handled.

Rochard 10-16-2016 06:14 PM

People twist everything. He did not say it is illegal to read Wikileaks. He said it was illegal for Wikileaks to have such information.

In this case, I do not believe having them is a crime. Hacking to get them is, but not the act of having them.

DBS.US 10-16-2016 09:35 PM

The media is the people=the people are the media:2 cents:

plaster 10-16-2016 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21226633)
People twist everything. He did not say it is illegal to read Wikileaks. He said it was illegal for Wikileaks to have such information.

In this case, I do not believe having them is a crime. Hacking to get them is, but not the act of having them.

Ok... you've now gone full retard and you are no longer under my umbrella of protection.

The guy clearly said it is illegal to have in your possession these leaked emails and not for the media so get your updates from them directly.

If nobody posts the transcript I will when I muster up the drive to do so.

It is my opinion rochard that you dangerously avoid truths to fit your strange, mostly creepy, self serving love for hillary clintom. My god man.. you served in the armed services! Get a hold of yourself!!

Paul Markham 10-17-2016 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 21226633)
People twist everything. He did not say it is illegal to read Wikileaks. He said it was illegal for Wikileaks to have such information.

In this case, I do not believe having them is a crime. Hacking to get them is, but not the act of having them.

If they're on your computer do you possess them?

Legal question that costs $10,000s to defend.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123