Cinton foundation now under investigation
 

EXCLUSIVE: IRS Investigates Clinton Foundation's 'Pay-to-Play' Operations | The Daily Caller

After previous requests from Republican congressmen the previous requsts were rejected.

Notice again, Republicans abusing the system then sending out press releases of investigation at a politically pivotal time.

Abuse of the system by politicians should be illegal with a minimum one year federal prison term.

House Republicans Ask Three Federal Agencies to Investigate the Clinton Foundation | LawNewz

The negative campaigning only gets more vicious from here. Best settle in and try to enjoy the circus freakshow on both sides.

It's going to be a wild ride to the finish.

You're a mindless parrot :1orglaugh

An example of the publics general publics sharp decline in intellectualism

oh for fucksakes nothing will happen no one will go to jail no one will pay more taxes it is what it is.

just vote for whoever you feel is less bad and make no fuzz about it TV is unwatchable thanks to these 2 fools

Definately! Great advice, good reminder :thumbsup

The Russian espionage hacking for Trump created a firestorm

The biggest US political criminal, by a very long way, is Bush. No need to explain why.

The right wing witch hunts lost - give it up lol....

No past Republican presidents are endorsing Trump, including both of the Bushes, seems Trump is below their already low standards.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...endorse-trump/

Good! I see that as a big positive. Screw the political machine.

bladewire points out bush opposes trump. unknowingly makes argument in support of trump.

:1orglaugh

Are you able to speak for yourself and form an opinion or is copy past of URL the only thing you're told to do?

Listen To What Happens When Trump Gets Asked Real Questions

I'm at work so I can't view it. Can you give me some of the points that they make?

In summary while Hillary was in office her hubby was out cutting deals that she could sign off on in exchange for donations to their foundation. Just one of those deals gave Russia 20% control of US Uranium rights.

Looks like you're judge & jury and know all the fact, fortunately you don't, and you're not.

Typical Republicans pointing the finger constantly, crying wolf over and over.

Meanwhile your candidate has been found by a court of law to have broken the law many times, and he's paid for it.

Big difference, but you're probably not American anyway just wanna stir the shit, or if you are probably a Southerner :1orglaugh:thumbsup

Did you read the book or watch the documentary?

Here's a little tidbit for ya. I am American and if you look to the left you'll notice a avatar.. I don't like either party. I absolutely despise Hillary Clinton. I don't really care for Trump either.

Of course not it's lies to create propaganda. You didn't know that?

Twenty-Plus Errors, Fabrications, And Distortions In Peter Schweizer's Clinton Cash

You do nothing but post pro Trump anti Clinton rhetoric.

You hated Obama too, posting conspiracies and how he's anti American etc, for years.

So you think Republicans & Democrats are the same but post nothing but anti Democrat, pro Republican rhetoric. I have friends like you and we spare, not saying you're bad, just pointing out the facts.

OK I just wanted to see how intellectually curious you really are to be informed. Thanks for answering that.

More taxpayers money wasted over nothing.
Lets do Benghazi investigation #35 while we at it.

Debunked.

Clinton Cash Crushed By Facts As Author Admits He Has No Evidence Of Clinton Crimes

Dude deal in reality man, the author of the book admitted last year that there's no evidence of crimes, on camera. Skip to 1:09 so hear him speak. Just like the Kerry swift boat lies they propagated to throw shade. Typical Republican tactic, point the finger of suspicion.


Clinton Cash Crushed By Facts As Author Admits He Has No Evidence Of Clinton Crimes

It's just a coincidence their foundation gets multi-million dollar donations after Hillary signs off. I see. :thumbsup

See what you did?

Faced with facts, from the authors own mouth that there is no evidence of laws broken, you STILL defend what you were fed. See what you did?

"just a coincidence" doesn't equal the law broken but in court it does equal reasonable doubt of guilt.

I never said she was guilty. Book lays out a lot of circumstances, but no direct links/facts. But its hard to come away from it thinking she is totally clean on it. Too many coincidences. At least to give you pause.

Just like Trump has a ton of little things that add up to big things. He has a lot of things to give you pause.

Just wanted to see if you were aware you were entering Joshua G territory, just from the left side.

This is just the beginning. I'm pretty sure we will be seeing a lot more about this real soon. Most likely by your favorite folks over at wikileaks and if I had to guess some notorious deleted emails.

Let's have yet another investigation into Clinton.

At what point in time does it become very obvious that this is nothing more than a witch hunt? We are not having yet another investigation because a crime has been committed, but only because the Republican party "hopes" a crime has been committed and or they "hope" to find something to make her look bad.

Meanwhile, we have an obvious crime - The DNC was hacked (perhaps by Russia) yet no one in Congress is demanding an investigation? Shouldn't this be the highest priority?

Why hold in investigation into a crime when instead we can connect imaginary dots that don't exist only to make a candidate look bad?

Why aren't we investigating Trump's connections to Russia?

"Mikhail Gorbachev, tear down that wall!" Ronald Reagan to Russia 6.12.1987

"I'm not going to tell Putin what to do" Donald Trump to Russia 2.27.2016

Vote for the candidate with the balls to tell Putin where we stand #VoteDemocrat

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

See, this is more of the same exact shit.

This is why I left the Republican party. I left during the Whitewater bullshit. They intentionally backed him into a corner where no matter what he would have been fucked. They set him up so that he either admitted he cheated on his wife or he would have lied under oath. It's incomprehensible how this happened - How does an investigation about an investment lead to blow jobs in the oval office? The only thing they accomplished was embarrassing the President, which, by the way, also embarrassed the United States.

Now we have more of the same. Nine investigations into Benghazi have revealed no wrong doing. Before I go further, why the fuck did we need nine investigations? Then we had the email investigation. You want proof it's a witch hunt? Less than a week after both the FBI and the Justice department said "No charges" Republicans demanded another investigation. Did they ask for an investigation into prior secretaries of state? Nah, that's not important. They don't want the truth, they want to make Hillary Clinton look bad.

Now we have more demands for another investigation where the person who accused them has no proof?

Meanwhile, an actual crime has taken place, and yet not one Republican is demanding an investigation.

Why aren't we launching an investigation into this hack? A foreign government might be involved? Shouldn't this be a huge priority?

I want my government to do it's job, not launch countless investigations where there is zero proof of criminal activity.

They are once again looking for evidence against Clinton.

The evidence against Trump in on a conveyor belt. Some of it in, and he was sentenced guilty, more is in the courts, more is waiting for a trial date, and more is popping up by the day.

And he has the audacity to call Hillary crooked.

which is strange, since i googled the last rejected request and came up with this:

'The Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation's flagship health program conceded earlier this year it had misreported by millions of the dollars the money it was given by governments compared with non-government donors in its tax returns for 2012 and 2013'

Republicans ask IRS to audit Clinton charity's finances | Reuters

kinda curious how a media company could find such a discrepancy, yet the foundation still doesn't get audited..

It seems he has two different trials at the end of November.... LOL.

And yet there is 160 other lawsuits pending against him.