What excuse will Republicans use for losing the war?
 

1. Clinton decimated the military
2. the French undermined us all the way
3. we were really only there to search for WMDs
4. Clinton got a blowjob
5. ???

:thefinger
:glugglug

The war won't be lost. It isn't just a Republican thing either.

The battle is only 9 days old and you're already admitting defeat. Haha.

Depends on how you define lose. It's unimaginable that we'll lose this war, get driven from Iraq with Saddam still in power. But there will be costs, both monetarily and human. Only time will answer that question.

None, cause unlike the democrats, we don't give up halfway.

<embed src=http://zingy.net/Humor_US/archives/wav/ass2nite.wav autostart=false>

Are you freedom?

:winkwink: hope someone get's the joke.

My dog ate it

It was lost before it ever started. Oh, they will "win" physically. But its already lost in the most important way, world opinion. The stated (and i think phoney) objective, to fight terrorism, will be a total failure. Just the opposite is going to happen, this is going to foment terrorism for years to come.
Even if you are sucker enough to believe their supposed objective, its already a lost cause.
As for their excuses, the only sure thing is they will blame any and all failure on someone other than themselves. But thats if they even admit any failure to begin with, which aint likely. Bush said today he thinks the "war is going well".

:1orglaugh
Desert Storm? Bush Sr.!?? hello!?

Residential shopping mall in Kuwait City just hit by a missile.

This war will end with the tactical nukes used. It's going to get out of hand and the U.S. will have to finish it off with a nuke.

It is a just war, as you can see the Middle East is a shithole filled with dangerous religious madmen, the citizens are for the most part are poverty stricken hostages. These countries are rich with the world's most valued commodity what you see on your TV is an indictment of the cretins who are in power.

This isn't a failure by the United States, it is beginning to look like they underestimated the enemy............ENEMIES........there are so many scumbag countries helping this lunatic that we might not be able to finish the job without a nuke.

What? Who said we are losing the war? The last time I looked outside, I didn't see any Iraqi tanks. We are sitting with our tanks outside of Baghdad as we type!

I believe some of the Northern Iraqi cities are getting hit with missiles as well. Iraqi missiles. Which can be expected I supposed, but they're firing directly into the city.

Isn't that the exact thing the coalition is getting flamed for?

crazy huh!!!

fast food thinking

best analagy for people like that is they finished their popcorn before the movie ended and now they feel cheated.

Why do we have this conversation now? Why don't we just wait til the war is over and analyze it afterwords.:warning

Hate to dump on your parade with facts, pal, but desert storm was won by us. The UN mandate was to free kuwait, which is what we did, in record time, and with minimal losses.

we were never there to invade Iraq, like we are now. So, our results as measured against our stated goals clearly knocks that one into the win category

Another hindsight prophet.

If we had removed Saddam at the time, people would be bitching we overstepped our bounds and went too far past our stated objective of kicking Iraq out of Kuwait.

I thought the UN coalition as a whole decided against removing Saddam at the time anyways?

unlike vietnam, kosovo which were ware waged by Democrats in the white house, and in which we gave up and left before finishing the job.

cause unlike the democrats,...

RePubs just charge blindly while talking from both sides of their mouths. :1orglaugh :Graucho

Read my lips... will live in infamy. :D

---------
reformed by enlightenment, former RePub

"If you are not a liberal in your twenties, you don't have a heart. If you are not a conservative in your thirties, you don't have a brain" -- Winston Churchill

They will find a way to blame Clinton.