nuke iraq?
 

Would you support nuking Baghdad?

I know that this is a pretty harsh thing to suggest, but I'm curious, I just read somewhere that we have about 12000 nuclear weapons. Would any AMERICANS on this board really mind if we just nuked baghdad and ended this whole thing. It would save a lot of money and lives of our young soldiers and certainly show that we mean it when we say we will pre-empt.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh 12000 nuclear weapons....


Why aren't we being invaded.. This war is full of shit...

shut the fuck up u fucking retard.

funny, we have the restraint not to use them.

I think that would defeat the purpose don't you think?... No matter what you think the agenda is..what would killing everybody and blowing up the oil wells accomplish?

Support totally

Mark

Uh... nuke? For what? To kill hundreds of thousands of people?

No. We will not nuke. Not yet anyway. Let's wait and watch. Saddam is going out with a bang... the scary part is we don't know who's bang will be taking him out.

It's hypocritical, who are we to say who can and cannot have nuclear wepons, when we have a few thousand (THOUSAND) stashed away..

who do we show outright hate towards? who do we support being bombed by terrorists? who do we declare as outright enemies?


huh, funny, only thing i can really agree on is our hatred for saddam and osama.


they do all of the above, and we know saddam is presumably trying to get nuclear capability. why let that happen? rather let him get it and unleash a mushroom cloud on the US cities and kill millions? sure, sounds like fun.

Do we really need to have this discussion again?

The reason we can say Iraq can not have nuclear weapons is because they agreed to those terms. They agreed, they can not have nuclear weapons. They agreed, they can not have nuclear weapons.

Understood?

If I'm not mistaken, I believe Pakistan has nuclear weapons as well. Although we're not exactly thrilled about that, we aren't invading them.

I'll repeat one more time. Iraq can not have nuclear weapons due to agreements that they made.

Point taken... I guess they fucked them selves.. :Graucho

sadam?

Yes, you will have to repeat it, over and over, and over and over, and over , and over, and over again. Talking to these liberals is like beating your head against a wall. The more you throw facts at them, the more they retreat to their misatken moral high ground and dig in. Frustrating isn't it?

Glad to have you around to help out with the task of de-bulshitting the board though.:thumbsup

oh here's the link i found that number at...some interesting reading on all WMD's here....

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,76879,00.html

The US should not even be there. 75 Billion Bush is asking for to pay for this fucking war.... My fucking tax dollars. Fuck that, I need my fucking car payment made right now.... does anyone care about that?

Our economy is in the shit and he wants 75 billion for a stupid fucking war.... what an asshole.


Fuck Bush! :321GFY

Yeah 75 billion is an awfull lot of money and that probably won't be enough either. We should be concentrating on protecting the people inside our own country and spending less time worrying about international affairs when it has such a ridiculous price tag.

If Bush really thinks IRAQ is a threat to our internal security, then I trust him to make the decision to take pre-emptive action. Keep it cheap and fucking nuke them....we're showing way too much restraint. We're spending a shitload of money playing nice and they're killing our troops out there. 9/11 showed us the dangers of not being pre-emptive, so let's win this and move on to the next asshole that wants to support terrorists. :2 cents:

Been a while since I've seen an isolationist reactionary. Who else should we nuke to save money? France? China? Maybe if we nuked Japan, we could eliminate the competition in electronics and cars and restart the economy huh?

:throwup what do they call your diorder, exactly?

Exactly, 75 billion would feed and shelter a lot of people in this country. Iraq is not our problem until they actually do something to us. This let's get them before they get us shit just does not cut it with me.

Why did the US sit back and let 9/11 happen, they knew about it? It is all bullshit.

Hey conspiracy boy, your tinfoil needs adjusting.

See... that's the thing. As much as I talk about isolationism being very cool, it isn't. A global economy is much more productive than a closed economy.

Protecting people inside our own country has everything to do with international affairs. International affairs need to be dealt with.

International affairs should be delt with on an as needed basis. I believe IRAQ applies and should be delt with much more harshly than we have. I'm sick of all this PC shit....it's not about "saving the iraqi people", it's about minimizing the threat of terrorist acts.

Agreed. If nukes were dropped right now it would be suicide. Wait. Saddam has something up his sleeves. Just wait.

We're fucked either way though.

We feed and shelter ourselves here in the US. Unless you'd like to go communist.

No not communist, but socialism does not sound too bad. Canada is doing ok.

Actually, I will have to dissagree with this. There are a lot of people collecting illegal Welfare and Disability. So, the government does support some of us.

isnt this thread the same as all the other,
WAR yes or WAR no threads,
shit come up with something entertaning.

Please prove to me that the US knew of it before it happened. And even if you can, it wouldn't make a difference as to my support of US policy. No one told me on 9/11 that I was gonna turn on my TV and watch 3000 international citizens brutally killed on live television....

After 60 years of mostly peace and prosperity and suffering from yet another cowardly attack, I feel that we have no choice but to flex our arm and put terrorists in their place for the good of the rest of the world. Once all terrorist states have been eliminated, then we can get back to being nice guys and enjoy another 60 years of moderate peace.

I am not saying that we should nuke everybody though it's not an option I would rule out....I threw the idea out in the open mostly to get a glimpse of what the american support would be if we did such a thing.

Then move to Canada. Most of us prefer the system we have.

I agree, I don't even know why I stepped into this one, I am so sick of this fucking war that is why I came on this board today. I guess I came in because my argument with stanton is dying.

Fuck War.... :thumbsup

For the record socialism sucks, i lived 13 years in canada, good concept but not worth 60% in income taxes and 15% sales tax.

Sorry but this is my thread, i ain't forcing you to participate and i haven't read any of the other war threads, i've been busy working the last few months and havent' posted since the night we reached 1 million posts, i'm not here to be entertaining, i'm here to share my opinion to those who care to talk about it and to keep the thread alive so i can see how many people would support such an extremist action.

I agree that is a bit high, but as a business owner, I pay out the ass for health insurance. When business is slow, that is a hard some to come up with every month.

wow thanks JESUS,
now you just sound so intellegent i have such DEEP respect for you considering its the same view as half of the other dum ass protestors.

for health insurance.

Toss in workers comp and contractors insurance etc and see how well you like it. ;-)

Socialism would be the perfect form of government *if* it was run the way it was thought up on paper (or so said all of our teachers wayyyy back)

What IS with all this nonsense about the US using WMD's and or nukes?? We won't and that is that. If we were attacked and being overwhelmed, maybe. So stop with the craziness.

Maybe if YOU guys had atomic bomb drills (like WE did) you all wouldn't be thinking this way all the time. Too many kids here yakking about BS that they have no clue about. :( As we were told at 18... leave it to the growed ups. (Bush and crew not included)