Stephen Hawking angers trump supporters LOL
 

Stephen Hawking Angers Trump Supporters with Baffling Array of Long Words - The New Yorker

Speaking to a television interviewer in London, Hawking called Trump ?a demagogue who seems to appeal to the lowest common denominator,? a statement that many Trump supporters believed was intentionally designed to confuse them.

Moments after Hawking made the remark, Google reported a sharp increase in searches for the terms ?demagogue,? ?denominator,? and ?Stephen Hawking.?

?For a so-called genius, this was an epic fail,? Trump?s campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, said. ?If Professor Hawking wants to do some damage, maybe he should try talking in English next time.?

Later in the day, Hawking attempted to clarify his remark about the presumptive Republican Presidential nominee, telling a reporter, ?Trump bad man. Real bad man.?



:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Stephen for president.

Holy shit...that quote by Corey Lewandowski sounds like something from The Onion...but after searching different sites, it appears he actually said it.

“For a so-called genius, this was an epic fail,” Trump’s campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, said. “If Professor Hawking wants to do some damage, maybe he should try talking in English next time.”

What a fucking moron. It's moronic on multiple levels.

If you like Donald Trump, you're lumped in with all of the other idiots whether you like it or not.

First time I've heard of this. I'm actually surprised he's stupid enough to say that publicly. He's truly Trumptified on all levels. Sadness tugs at my heart this very moment.

That's some decent satire, that's what the new Yorker does, satire.

Uptick in Google search for demagogue, that's cute. Hyperbole, but cute.

Dumbfuckwad, there is not one valid link backing up that quote

You really really really don't know what a fucking quote is.

Ahahahahahahahaahahahahaha

No wonder satire goes right over your dumbfuckwad head.

Andy Borowitz is lol

WOW!!! Corey Lewandowski... Bahahahahahahahaha.....

I wonder what's next? Sarah Palin for VP?



Geezuz...

isn't it from the new yorker satire site? Stephen Hawking Angers Trump Supporters with Baffling Array of Long Words - The New Yorker

so basically the onion.

However, Hawking 'doesn't have an explanation for the rise of trump', when plenty seem to be able to reference Bush becoming president and how that has impacted trumps ability

Wow, I understand that our resident idiot Serb may have a language disadvantage, but having "humor" in the URL wasn't a hint to the rest of the English speaking retards here?

Yes, looks like its just satire. Really, really good satire though. I like.

Is that a Trumpism?

no, it's a dyna mojism. made it up myself for dumbfuckwads like that piece of shit bronco67.

He's spot on. If you want to damage Trump, you have to talk in a way his supporters will understand and not have to find a dictionary to find out. Best to stick to the level of language Trump uses.

like that's been working.

heads up: Trump's winning. after a full year of attacks on his supporters. you dingbat liberals think you'll get more bees with vinegar than honey, if you even stop and think about it. but you don't, you just attack and it's backfiring in your face.

you lose.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

That can take outa of your shoes

finally someone realizes an inspiration behind my gifted contributions to gfy.

btw, you've done a good job of maintaining an air of dignity in disagreeing. it would be nice for you to continue that. either way is fine by me, i give people the right of first refusal on how a debate goes. i win by brain power or brute force.

you'd also be better served if you didn't jump into the middle of things. bronco67 Esq dumbfuckwad stupidly tried to attack me out of the blue recently based on his complete lack of understanding what a quote is and the fact he's a drunk miserable dumbfuckwad libtard piece of shit.

he's getting treated like he deserves to be treated.

*trump supporters googling satire,demagogue and hyperbole intensifies* :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

it was a perfectly good troll you should have rolled with it :2 cents:

you're full of shit, you were the one trolled.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

you should have rolled with it :2 cents::2 cents:

you're deluded. and shell shocked from USA bombs. why the fuck would i roll with your shit? all you do is spew anti-american vitriol, and you think i'm supposed to high 5 you?

fuck you.

Are you so dense that you still have not realized the comment was never made?

</rhetorical question>

I thought it was satire at first, and I even said it sounded like something from The Onion. But I Googled it and saw it on many sites. Maybe you're right.

But you sound like an 3rd grader idiot when you try to communicate.

i'm tired of fucking with you man. i would like for you to be tired of fucking with me. not sure why we just can't disagree without the crazy character assasinations that get launched.

Usually, I make good point and you call me fuckwad. So that's you're level of communication.

Now it's your turn to call me fuckwad. Or you could not respond, which would be the smarter move because cooler heads prevail, and I always have the cooler head.

see, that's where you are thoroughly confused. you like to think you provoke me, then when i reply in kind, you react with posts like above where you exclaim, "see, look at dyna mo flip out for no reason."

for instance, just this last time, i started a thread about what BO should have said in hiroshima and included a quote without the link. why did i not include the link? funny i should ask that because you never did before you attacked me accusing me of plagiarism.

so that's your version of making a good point, that's when i replied back with the your a dumbfuckwad.

you know this, you're an Esq.!

I do not speak American. Do I have to leave the country now?

Stephen Hawking never ran a successful business ...

:1orglaugh

i hope you have your flamesuit on

poking idiots is fun it has nothing to do with high fives or rolling with my shit...go drop a bomb somewhere you will feel better :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

i dropped that bomb in here!

For some one who claims he isn't voting for Trump, you are almost always the first guy in a given topic making excuses for him. Why do you always try to distract from people saying things you don't like about Trump?

You sound just like the rest of the conservabros. In fact I can't see a difference between you and the rest of them aside from you aren't as crazy as josh G and dumshit.

you mock what you are insecure about and don't understand. for some reason, you desperately need me to lambaste Trump with you or in your mind, i'm not pro-Sanders. you also seem to think that by trying to insult who you think are trump supporters, that somehow will convince us to high 5 you.

in reality, the most fundamental reason i don't join you with the liberal lynch mob attacking trump is it simply doesn't work.

More weak excuses, attempting to distract and blame rather than own up..

own up to a satire thread that backfired in an anti-americans face? :1orglaugh

are you even paying attention? i bombed the shit out of this thread, directly, head-on.

boom.

try and keep up.

No you are a party pooper who captain obvious-ed a perfectly good troll article and now you are trying to turn it around, like I did not know, and its not working LOL

It would have been fun to see the wall people all rustled up but captain obvious had to google it because he was not sure himself LOL

Now be a good boy and go pay some health insurance and your student debts and bubble mortgage ��

No. I've been quite familiar with the new Yorker since I had subscriptions to it for years starting back in the early 1990s. It's been around for 100 years I'm guessing. First world people are familiar with it.

Not that I wouldn't have bombed your thread anyway, you get what you give. Besides, you've not only proven you didn't grasp it was satire, you're not even aware of the new Yorker.

LOL! Save it, Dynamo.

I hope that you are not as bitter and depressed in real life as you seem to be online.

that's a solid canadian effort, **********. it would make sense if it weren't for it being a reaction to my giving you credit for something positive. kinda hard to back up your reactionary fingerpointing when i initially gave you a compliment, out of the blue.

i'm also glad i was able to help you grasp satire, you fell for the serbi's satire thread, i could have ripped your head off for that, instead i recognized a quality.

enjoy your postings at gfy **********!

Trump can talk when he's accomplished atleast half of the feats that Hawking has, or brought to the table atlas a third of what Hawking has to the world.

Are you so dense that you still have not realized my comment was a general guidec when dealing with the less educated?

</rhetorical question> As you clearly missed that bit.

Trump does not have near the grasp of politics Stephen Hawkins has.

Hillary high 5!

I saw it on imgur you dumb twat :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh look at the date of the post captain obvious

Hawking trolls the Trumpians - Imgur

now go be quite familiar with my nuts :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh