![]() |
multi-processor scrubbing and chargebacks
With all the billing discussions going on, I see that a lot of people are using a primary processor, and then one or more backup processors in case the first processor declines the card - ie it "scrubs too hard".
Doesn't this increase the risk of chargebacks? I mean, if a processor has fraud scrubbing in place which rejects a card, and you then go through other processors until you find one that accepts it, aren't you increasing the risk of letting a fraudulent card through? I'm interested in peoples experience on whether this is true - ie multi-processors means more fraud, and if so whether the increased signups outweigh the extra costs of the chargebacks. Ta Very Much. Danny |
Silly of me to bother starting a thread that relates to adult business on GFY.
I'll just stick to international politics and dick-length comparisons in future :winkwink: |
cascading added about 15% for us..
Mulitiple processors are the only way to go |
Quote:
Let me know if you have any questions or want to see a walkthrough of our system and fraud tools. Thank you, Mitch Farber Toll Free within the US: (888)357-8166 Outside the US: (661)252-2456 ICQ: 117496436 |
Quote:
How much are your setup fees for everything and what is your turnaround time? Thanks. |
Quote:
Netbilling will not charge a setup fee if you mention GFY and we can setup your check processing quickly. Ready to save some $$$ and be in control? Toll Free within the US: (888)357-8166 Outside the US: (661)252-2456 ICQ: 117496436 Thank you, Mitch Farber |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123