Gail Dines: ?Is Porn Immoral? That Doesn?t Matter: It?s a Public-Health Crisis.?
 

In 2010, Arkansas psychologist Ana Bridges and colleagues scrutinized 304 scenes that they would deem in a scientific journal to be ?popular pornographic videos.? The researchers were looking for aggression. It was not rare; 88 percent of the scenes contained what the experts deemed physical aggression, defined in the academic journal as ?principally spanking, gagging, and slapping.? Nearly half contained verbal aggression, usually from men toward women, who ?most often showed pleasure or responded neutrally to the aggression.?

To sociologist Gail Dines, a self-identifying radical feminist and ?anti-porn advocate,? these findings added to a body of evidence that she deemed conclusive. Dines believes that non-coercive pornography cannot exist in a capitalist society, where sex-based media will always lead to an industry that becomes a violent manifestation of structural inequalities. In The Washington Post this weekend, Dines wrote a column that spread widely: ?Is Porn Immoral? That Doesn?t Matter: It?s a Public-Health Crisis.?

How Utah Declared Pornography a 'Public-Health Crisis' - The Atlantic

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poste...health-crisis/

Using phones while driving or walking is the bigger public health risk.