this ? is for Amp and the other vets on the board
 

in the eyes of a soldier when is it ok to use tactical nukes or nukes? how would that affect the soldiers on the ground? wouldn't the nuclear fallout be almost worst than chemical weapons?

:321GFY

Don't use nukes while your men are there. Pull 'em outta there PDQ, then drop nukes if you're determined to do so.

Personally, I wouldn't use them at all unless it becomes absiolutely necessary...and I can't really think of a stiuation where it's actually okay to use them. Just my :2 cents:

Yea, just a little worse than chemical weapons... that's why they have only been used once... Well 2 bombs...1 war...:winkwink:

Its pretty much US policy to not use WMD unless attacked with WMD first.

I know for a fact that we have chlorine, mustard, blood agent (cyanide gas) and a few forms of nerve agent in artillery rounds because i have seen the ammo myself when I was in the army.

We also have nuclear artillery rounds that can be fired out of a M198 155mm howitzer, danger zone with three nuclear bands is 20 miles, what sucks is it can only be fired 18 miles. I forgot the danger zone area with less bands being used, but the area can be relatively small blast/kill zone or very large.

You wont see a nuke in this war, but i cant guess as to whether some other stuff will be used or not.