GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Tesla Model S Fined For Producing Too Much Emissions - Jalopnik (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1187019)

dyna mo 03-09-2016 02:13 PM

Tesla Model S Fined For Producing Too Much Emissions - Jalopnik
 
Tesla Model S Fined For Producing Too Much Emissions - Jalopnik

The fine comes from Singapore?s Land Transport Authority, or LTA, which gives fines or rebates depending on how much (or how little) pollution a car emits. According to the LTA?s calculations, the Tesla Model S produces the equivalent of 222g/km of CO2, which is enough to categorize it as a serious polluter.

Dvae 03-09-2016 02:22 PM

NO NO NO that can't be right!
It runs on free, emissions free electricity!

slapass 03-09-2016 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dvae (Post 20760945)
NO NO NO that can't be right!
It runs on free, emissions free electricity!

You read that they are just fucking with Tesla right. You understood the situation?

poncabare 03-09-2016 10:12 PM

I think dvae is pointing out the irony, such as the following: Obama-backed green energy failures leave taxpayers with $2.2 billion tab, audit finds - Washington Times

its legitimacy is warranted. I know the money comes from thin air, but still...

TheSquealer 03-09-2016 10:17 PM

Thanks Tesla!
Thanks Obama!


https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...st-winter.html

2MuchMark 03-09-2016 10:39 PM

Doesn't seem right somehow...

There's an interesting post under the article that says this:

Quote:

Once again, Jalopnik re-types a story without doing proper research.

If you actually read the story as posted by the owner, you will find the smog shop calculated the Tesla’s emissions by driving a predetermined circuit, letting it sit over night, measuring the next day, repeating the circuit, measuring the next day, so on for a few days.

This would be equivalent to leaving a gasoline car idle all night long, then averaging the total fuel consumption over the circuit only. Huge incompetence on the part of the government, huge incompetence on the part of the smog shop.
And it looks like Elon Musk is on the case : Tesla boss calls PM Lee over CO2 surcharge levied on first Model S in Singapore, Transport News & Top Stories - The Straits Times

will be cool to see how this pans out.

JFK 03-10-2016 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poncabare (Post 20761959)
I think dvae is pointing out the irony, such as the following: Obama-backed green energy failures leave taxpayers with $2.2 billion tab, audit finds - Washington Times

its legitimacy is warranted. I know the money comes from thin air, but still...

2.2 Billion is better spent on this, then the countless bullshit wars !:2 cents:

ITraffic 03-10-2016 09:40 AM

the US spends 10 million per hour on war.

Barry-xlovecam 03-10-2016 09:56 AM

I hope to see electricity produced from hydrolysis then burning the hydrogen and cycling back like perpetual motion. There would be no carbon in the chain. This cannot be done now on an economic scale (prototype scale?).

Hydroelectric and Geothermal can be done but that it too localized.

Burning hydrocarbons to produce electricity to power personal transportation won't work in the long run. We are just trading one kind of pollution for another. Hydrogen fuel cell technology engines have always seemed to me to be a better solution but driving around the ''Hindenburg'' is a safety issue -- they have to work that one out :2 cents:

poncabare 03-10-2016 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 20763207)
2.2 Billion is better spent on this, then the countless bullshit wars !:2 cents:


Cute rebuttal, but one has nothing to do with the other

PAR 03-10-2016 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20761992)
"the smog shop calculated the Tesla?s emissions by driving a predetermined circuit, letting it sit over night, measuring the next day, repeating the circuit, measuring the next day, so on for a few days.
This would be equivalent to leaving a gasoline car idle all night long, then averaging the total fuel consumption over the circuit only."

will be cool to see how this pans out.

Hey Mark it will be cool to see how it pans out.
As to the legitimacy of the test.

I know you own a Tesla, would you say that the test replicates how you use your car?
Drive from A-B round trip, park over night etc.
As a gas powered car uses no gas when parked for the night and a Tesla continues to consume power to me the test would seem to reflect how the car is used and is a true test of its power consumption and thus its emissions.

That is unless people are turning their Model S off and then disconnecting the battery packs over night.

Robbie 03-10-2016 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAR (Post 20764722)

I know you own a Tesla,

No, he owns a Chevy Volt. He wants a Tesla (so do I...the sports car model that is)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123