Suicide bombers decimate americans in Basra.
 

Russian t.v. reports The Iraqis laid a ambush in Basra by surrendeering some troops in a small part of the city and letting the americans enter, once inside Iraqi civilians threw flowers and cheered the americans, once the americans felt safe and started to mingle, hundreds of Saddam?s Fedayeen Suicide female bombers attacked and killed hundreds of american troops....in the rush to get out the americans left via the same streets they entered, only to find the iraqis had laid remote controlled bombs under the roads, total death toll could run as high as 10,000 american troops....although im against this war, my heart goes out to the families in america wen they get the news of their children dying...its time for this war to stop!

This kinda stuff is exactly why they should carpet bomb indiscriminately

uh?

10,000?

poor attempt to be a joke I guess

That is so not absolutely even close to anything true

If this is true....this is fucked.
They should jsut level the whole fucking country.

It's worth a few Americans to get rid of the occasional suicide bomber.

Need Proof... Give us a URL.

Nice attitude 'liberator' ...

I am sure he can't. He's spreading lies for days already

10,000 stfu. If anything 100 would be dead.

When they mingle do you not think they are ready? Do you not think they bring tanks, and heavy duty hummers into the cities. They are always ready, they always have patrols going on, look outs.

Do you really underestimate the US military?

Are you Russian Dazzling? just wondering

So what you're saying is that 10,000 troops walked into a city, there were female suicide bombers that killed most of them and the rest died because of the remote controlled explosives?

Who else knows about this besides you?

I was also the first person to break the news on american hostages and no-one believed that too...
just as no-one believed wen i broke the news on helicopters and planes down....give it 12 hours and it will be plastered across american news!

damn you need to be on Saddams military staff...that would have been a kick ass plan :1orglaugh

50th!

LOL! It's not even on the Al-Jaseadaeazssadasdasdasdasera network. So STFU.

u believe that shit? I don't

O.K., Debka file, has just now posted the news of suicide bombers in basra, although they dont mention any deaths, deka has been also about 6-12 hours ahead of american media too.
www.debka.com

pi mpdog is banned AND this fucking piece of shit who does nothing here but cheer for the death and blood of American is allowed to post this shit here all day long?

so fucking transparent, he loves this shit, his little three inch dick stands an inch taller when he reads the Russians report more death of Americans.


ban him now.

ok if this is your source than how do you get 10,000?

This is such bullshit

This is NOT my source, my souce is Russia t,v, i was merly highlighting the fact that Israeli site Debka has now posted that american troops are facing Fedayeen suicide bombers in Basra.

For the record, the Washington post has now just also posted an article supporting the fact that American troops have been killed by Fedayeen in Iraq....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2003Mar23.html

As always, my posts have proven to be 100% accurite in time, just as this post will!

...and in 3 days Iraki troops will march on Washington....

Considering that almost all of the news on CBC, MSNBC, FOX, CNN, BBC etc are LIVE from satellite uplinks, I have no idea why dazzler keeps saying his preciious Russian media are "12 hours ahead" of anyone.

Because dazzler is Russian.

the washington post said 10 casualties,, i guess 10,000 in russia means 10

Bullshit propaganda from the left is just as insufferable as bullshit from the right. Post up a link or shut the fuck up!

Yeah, cuz they think its the ruble conversion rate:1orglaugh

Irak dont use Suicide female bombers:321GFY
irak is not a barbarian civilisation ashole
there is a civilisation in bagdad for more that 6000 years now!

Other news sources are starting to say this, but their numbers are around 100 or so. Like the first post said "could run as high as 10,000". He wasn't saying 10,000.
ZoiNk

post some links!

Are you that retarded on this subject? The news is purposely censored here. Was it on the news that the attack on Iraq actually started hours before the deadline? What about the video of the POW's that isn't shown here. It's a fact, other news sources aren't scared to post the news as soon as they get it whereas the US waits until they are given the OK.

Never tought I could share your views...

:thumbsup

... sad what people come up with just to catch some attraction ...

Yes western media likes to get news VERIFIED before they go report everything they hear "might" or "could of" happened. That help prevents the B.S propaganda and panic that everyone reads too much into.

never ever trust a russian.

:1orglaugh

Washington Post

U.S. field officers said the Marine battalion spearheading the fight had suffered significant casualties in a battle with irregular guerrilla fighters known as Saddam's Fedayeen.

They gave no details but a CNN television correspondent at Nassiriya quoted eyewitnesses in the battle as saying they had seen at least 10 American bodies around an amphibious assault vehicle that had been hit by a rocket-propelled grenade.

------

CNN saying that there are NO SPECIFIC DETAILS on deaths in Nassiriya.

Wow the US is reporting stiff resistance and more US casualties. No numbers have been released.

Not only in Basra either.

I thought Iraqis were just going to roll over.

stock you cocksucker, for the most part they are. But even a few ragheads with ak47s can halt an advance.

Keep watching your news on CNN and being clueless to the world. Your complete ignorance on the matter is saddening.










But wait, even Bush and CNN are saying this is going to be much harder than most Americans expect. Guess there is no help for you.

well, a brig. general on Newsworld just stated a few minutes ago in an interview w/ press that they still hadn't found any WMD, but they have some good leads..!

yea, lets just back away. Brutal saddam is just too tough for us. Fucking pussy.

If any of our troops thought twice about shooting an iraqi, they wont now.

Are you that fucking ignorant fucker? I posted that because there are so many people here saying all this bullshit about how much of a fucking cakewalk this is/was going to be.

I never said back off because Saddam is too tough for us. We will win but most people here think that it's going to be so fucking easy and last a week, month, whatever. We will have a presense in Iraq and suffer casualties for a long long time.


Anyway for twisting my words and showing what a dipshit you are GO FUCK YOURSELF BITCH.

You fucking LIAR!:321GFY
Your post was not a joke, but simply an attempt to upset people HOPEFULLY!

1)There were no female suicide bombers.
2)There were Republican guards dressed as civilians who were supposedly surrendering to American troops.
3)It appears TEN (10..not 10,000) American troops were then killed by these suicide bombings.

So while Iraq managed to kill 10 Americans, they did it in the most cowardly way possible!

So as far as giving misinformation..go :Kissmy

These are isolated skirmishes, not even worthy of being called a battle and have zero effect on the campaign. The goals of the campaign are ahead of schedule and will come to fruition when our main forces surround Baghdad.

There were three primary goals to this campaign.

#1 To take control of the ports in Southern Iraq.

#2 To secure the Southern and Northern oil fields to keep them from being blown, for multiple reasons.

#3 To drive to Baghdad (by passing smaller cities and smaller Iraqi forces) surround it and isolate it.

All three of these goals are being achieved. No one, but no one, with a brain thought that there would not be some pockets of resistence. The outcome of the campaign is known and is inevitable.

#1 There is more resistance than most people here suspected and there is definately more than "small pockets of resistance".
#2 They thought they had control of the ports and cities several times only to be engaged.
#3 See sig.

You are confusing secure with control. They have control, is everything completely secure, no. Even when the whole country is under US control, will it be entirely secure, no. There are only small pockets of resistance, but you are entitled to classify small pockets of resistance anyway you choose. Anyone familiar with war certainly knew there would be some resistance, only the ignorant did not.