GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   US Government wants to make interracial sex obscene? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=117885)

jact 03-20-2003 09:49 PM

US Government wants to make interracial sex obscene?
 
What the fuck? With a country as diverse as the USA, one would suspect that interracial sex is something that happens every 4.7 seconds and shouldn't be considered obscene?

I can understand to a point them wanting to make it obscene to fuck a veggie.. To a POINT, but really. I think they're going way too far.

Your thoughts?

m0rph3us 03-20-2003 09:50 PM

link ?

Sly_RJ 03-20-2003 09:50 PM

What? Where?

XxXotic 03-20-2003 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jact
What the fuck? With a country as diverse as the USA, one would suspect that interracial sex is something that happens every 4.7 seconds and shouldn't be considered obscene?

I can understand to a point them wanting to make it obscene to fuck a veggie.. To a POINT, but really. I think they're going way too far.

Your thoughts?

the US is ghey, anything but missionary is illegal here in LA

Nina 03-20-2003 09:51 PM

PROVE IT.


(I think that's all I'm going to say from now on)

Tala 03-20-2003 09:52 PM

http://216.40.249.192/s/contrib/dvv/cwmddd.gif

stocktrader23 03-20-2003 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jact
What the fuck? With a country as diverse as the USA, one would suspect that interracial sex is something that happens every 4.7 seconds and shouldn't be considered obscene?

I can understand to a point them wanting to make it obscene to fuck a veggie.. To a POINT, but really. I think they're going way too far.

Your thoughts?

Although I have seen several things Bush and co. wanted to make obscene I haven't heard of this one yet. I did hear they wanted to make anal sex, both m/m or m/f obscene/illegal and a few other retarded things.

But don't try to tell that to all of Bush's fuck buddies lurking around this board. They don't want to believe what pricks the republicans are being and won't believe it until they are in jail getting their own illegal anal sex from a giant dude named Bubba.

jact 03-20-2003 09:54 PM

http://xbiz.com/articles/index.php?article_idp=487

Quote:

Swearing in the Enemy
...as Bush took an aggressive stance against erotica during his campaign, saying, ?Porn has no place in a decent society.? One source predicts that thirty or more companies will be targeted by the Justice Department in the short term. There is also widespread speculation that the content dhahahahated in modern adult films will change, in reaction to the potential appointments. On the list of endangered scenes are food used as sex objects, urination, coffins, blindfolds, interracial and, of course, ?the money shot.?

jact 03-20-2003 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stocktrader23


Although I have seen several things Bush and co. wanted to make obscene I haven't heard of this one yet. I did hear they wanted to make anal sex, both m/m or m/f obscene/illegal and a few other retarded things.

But don't try to tell that to all of Bush's fuck buddies lurking around this board. They don't want to believe what pricks the republicans are being and won't believe it until they are in jail getting their own illegal anal sex from a giant dude named Bubba.

I've been following the Bush and party bullshit since he was running for office and I find it simply amazing that there's people with blinders on to the point where they deny that one of his goals is to clean up the porn. I'll be glad when he's out, personally.

jact 03-20-2003 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by XxXotic
the US is ghey, anything but missionary is illegal here in LA
Oral sex is illegal in several provinces, I find that amusing. Voyeur type photos are illegal in Florida.... Anal sex is illegal in Canada at the federal level (There are allowances but for the most part it's illegal). I think these laws are on the books just to make people's lives difficult. heh. If they want to be dicks, they can be.

Just like the new reformed anti-spam bill, removing the word "child" from the text giving them the ability to target any online pornography, not just child pornography.

Sick world. Sick government.

stocktrader23 03-20-2003 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jact


I've been following the Bush and party bullshit since he was running for office and I find it simply amazing that there's people with blinders on to the point where they deny that one of his goals is to clean up the porn. I'll be glad when he's out, personally.

Sad part is, I don't make it a point to follow Bush's stance on porn yet I know more about it than the majority of porn site owners on this board. Everytime this subject comes up you hear the same damn thing "AssCraft and Bush will only go after cp, rape, and beast, they will leave everything else alone"

My fucking ass. How hard is it to understand that a governtment that busts dozens of companies for selling fucking pipes WILL go after porn. :321GFY

The Truth Hurts 03-20-2003 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jact


I've been following the Bush and party bullshit since he was running for office and I find it simply amazing that there's people with blinders on to the point where they deny that one of his goals is to clean up the porn. I'll be glad when he's out, personally.


Gore would have been far worse for porn.

jact 03-20-2003 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stocktrader23


Sad part is, I don't make it a point to follow Bush's stance on porn yet I know more about it than the majority of porn site owners on this board. Everytime this subject comes up you hear the same damn thing "AssCraft and Bush will only go after cp, rape, and beast, they will leave everything else alone"

My fucking ass. How hard is it to understand that a governtment that busts dozens of companies for selling fucking pipes WILL go after porn. :321GFY

I don't see them stopping at any reasonable point, however hopefully the cases will get heard by juries that aren't offended by seeing a nude kneecap. All we can do is hope that they go as well as the Seymore Butts case.

jact 03-20-2003 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts



Gore would have been far worse for porn.

Perhaps. They're both hippie Christians. Trying to impose their own morality upon a country as diverse as the USA isn't going to bode very well I don't think.

:2 cents:

stocktrader23 03-20-2003 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jact


I don't see them stopping at any reasonable point, however hopefully the cases will get heard by juries that aren't offended by seeing a nude kneecap. All we can do is hope that they go as well as the Seymore Butts case.

Yea, I'm sure most of their bullshit laws would be challenged down the road and dealt with accordingly but it's the meantime that I'm worried about. I don't want to be the one that has to fight the uphill fight first.

stocktrader23 03-20-2003 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts



Gore would have been far worse for porn.

How can you get worse? Anal sex, interracial sex, cumshots? On top of that Bush and co would be going after obscenity on even regular sites if they weren't preoccupied with global affairs. I wouldn't be suprised if they are targetting some of the big boys as we speak.

The Truth Hurts 03-20-2003 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by stocktrader23


How can you get worse? Anal sex, interracial sex, cumshots? On top of that Bush and co would be going after obscenity on even regular sites if they weren't preoccupied with global affairs. I wouldn't be suprised if they are targetting some of the big boys as we speak.


For starters, his wife is Tipper Gore... Remember her, and her per projects?

Second, his anti-porn stance was well documented on his website while he was running for president.
It READ a lot worse than anything I saw from the Bush side.

Third, aside from the regularly scheduled chicken-little post (the same crap that i've seen posted every couple of months since 1996.. almost as reliable as Serge's piss attempts), nothing has happened, and nothing WILL happen as long as there is an ACLU.

stocktrader23 03-20-2003 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts



For starters, his wife is Tipper Gore... Remember her, and her per projects?

Second, his anti-porn stance was well documented on his website while he was running for president.
It READ a lot worse than anything I saw from the Bush side.

Third, aside from the regularly scheduled chicken-little post (the same crap that i've seen posted every couple of months since 1996.. almost as reliable as Serge's piss attempts), nothing has happened, and nothing WILL happen as long as there is an ACLU.

:1orglaugh

TDF 03-20-2003 10:23 PM

www.irjunkie.com

alias 03-20-2003 10:25 PM

can't have them durty sp00ks fuckin out our white womens :(

421Fill 03-20-2003 10:26 PM

Saying Interracial sex should be illegal is ludicrous... It's racist, too. Besides just about everyone I know, including myself is in an interracial relationship... especially here in LA.

Obscenity laws read that it be determined by community standards, and frankly, I believe that the community standards are becoming very lax nowadays.

I mean take a look at prime time television... 20 years ago half of it would have been considered obsecene. My hope is that by the time these issues are put before the community that most people will be desensitized to porn in general.

jact 03-20-2003 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by turbo
Saying Interracial sex should be illegal is ludicrous... It's racist, too. Besides just about everyone I know, including myself is in an interracial relationship... especially here in LA.

Obscenity laws read that it be determined by community standards, and frankly, I believe that the community standards are becoming very lax nowadays.

I mean take a look at prime time television... 20 years ago half of it would have been considered obsecene. My hope is that by the time these issues are put before the community that most people will be desensitized to porn in general.

That would be ideal. However I wouldn't want to be footing the legal fees to be found innocent.

421Fill 03-20-2003 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jact


That would be ideal. However I wouldn't want to be footing the legal fees to be found innocent.

Me, either. That's why Larry Flynt is a god in my opinion.

stocktrader23 03-20-2003 10:39 PM

http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,44398,00.html
http://www.techtv.com/siliconspin/fe...328843,00.html
http://www.cluebot.com/articles/01/06/08/2143247.shtml
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,41164,00.html
http://www.nationalcoalition.org/ash...petition.phtml

jact 03-20-2003 10:41 PM

He's been a busy boy, hasn't he? I don't think he pounds it often enough.

The Truth Hurts 03-20-2003 10:45 PM

Wow.. a bunch of 2 year old articles..

tony286 03-20-2003 10:48 PM

Everyone said I was a wimp for not going hardcore, Bush gets another four years I will be one of the few that can breath easy. lol

The Truth Hurts 03-20-2003 10:52 PM

Killing off porn is an impossible task.

If porn were suddenly removed from society, rape would increase by about 1000%.

tony286 03-20-2003 10:54 PM

You see porn wont be killed off, American porn on the net will be killed off .

Sarah_Jayne 03-21-2003 02:49 AM

it isn't just the acutal implication it is the mere fact that it would be introduced.

andi_germany 03-21-2003 03:27 AM

If Bush is reelected you US webmasters better move the stuff to Europe

Gemini 03-21-2003 03:40 AM

better move the stuff to Europe...

HOW many times does it have to be said that doing this will NOT keep a US citizen from being prosecuted?! Sheesh

genomega 03-21-2003 04:57 AM

Every antiporn bill in congress is sponsored by a democrat pandering to womens rights groups like now and you guys blame bush and ashhahahahaha If you bothered to read the xbiz article it was talking about another bill sponsored by a democrat.
You are letting politics cloud your judgement.

:glugglug

stocktrader23 03-21-2003 05:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts


Wow.. a bunch of 2 year old articles..

Yes, we have been pre-occupied with global affairs. You can believe they will get back down to business eventually. Hopefully Bush is gone in 2 years.

the real magoo 03-21-2003 05:06 AM

Oral sex is illegal in the US? :1orglaugh

blazin 03-21-2003 06:23 AM

You guys need to bring back Clinton :)

jas1552 03-21-2003 06:26 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by blazin
You guys need to bring back Clinton :)
You mean the guy who signed COPA?

emmanuelle 03-21-2003 08:51 AM

Making interracial "obscene" will NEVER, EVER, stand. Racism is a crime, and the ACLU would have a field day with this. In fact, it would probably be the case that once & for all defined obscenity, and we all know that the US gov doesn't want that to be clear. Grey areas are their friend.

Kimmykim 03-21-2003 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by emmanuelle
Making interracial "obscene" will NEVER, EVER, stand. Racism is a crime, and the ACLU would have a field day with this. In fact, it would probably be the case that once & for all defined obscenity, and we all know that the US gov doesn't want that to be clear. Grey areas are their friend.
Yep. Entirely correct.

Danny_C 03-21-2003 09:14 AM

Ralph Nader would have had better things to do than prosecute porn... at least I voted for the right guy.

FadeEP 03-21-2003 09:15 AM

Heard about this in a previous post but not sure how true it is..

chupacabra 03-21-2003 10:52 AM

fuck Shrub and his croneys... piss on all of them, fuck them w/ a carrot..

tony286 03-21-2003 11:02 AM

Quote:

Making interracial "obscene" will NEVER, EVER, stand. Racism is a crime, and the ACLU would have a field day with this.
They wont say a word, what do you think Jessie Jackson is going to come out and say. " Now they say its obscene to fuck their white women in pictures and videos" maybe they will have a rally lol. The problem is have cumshots and fucking all over your front pages and tours,send porn spam to little old ladies and kids. You will only be making it easier for them .

jas1552 03-21-2003 11:04 AM

I don't think any politician half way decent at politics would ever vote to abolish interracial anything.
People when you read this stuff keep the source in mind.

BrutalMaster 03-21-2003 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by The Truth Hurts



...nothing has happened, and nothing WILL happen as long as there is an ACLU.

I'm not sure I agree with this. There was an ACLU during the Reagan years, and the Meese commission scored several convictions...and not just of big names in the porn industry.

As a matter of fact, by some accounts, Meese's anti porn crusade was actually a money maker for the Justice Dept. bringing in more money in fines and forfeitures than it cost.

I believe Gore would have been a problem, too...but remember, Gore would not be appointing ultra-conservative judges to the federal bench.

Brutal

tony286 03-21-2003 11:22 AM

Quote:

ever vote to abolish interracial anything.

They dont have to vote on it. If they go after you ,think about them prosecuting you in Idahowhere there are no black people and they show an all white jury. {That can happen you are on the net.}A pic of young looking blonde chick with cum all over her face and a big black dick swinging over her face is shown to jury from your site or one of those blacks on blonde type of pics where they are gang banging a white chick with their hands around her neck. Do you really think it will be that hard to get a obscenity verdiction ? They are not going to go after you in NY,CA or Atlanta. They will pick the midwest, to make convictions stick.

UnseenWorld 03-21-2003 11:23 AM

To try to make porn obscene based on interracial content would be laughed out of court. Still, I do find a lot of interracial porn offensive with its dhahahahation of "nice innocent white girls" craving the "huge" cocks of black men who as dhahahahated most of the time look like streetcorner dudes, not young black college men.

(You mean "d e p i c t i o n" and "d e p i c t e d" are banned now?)

tony286 03-21-2003 11:31 AM

Thats not true go find the cambria list online, Paul Cambria (one of the greatest first amendment lawyers that ever lived)created it for his clients one of them being Larry Flynt.The list shows things that people have been convicted for. People have been convicted with interracial.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123