GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   News PM Harper standing firm on Canuck refugee policy (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1173644)

SilentKnight 09-09-2015 07:35 PM

PM Harper standing firm on Canuck refugee policy
 
Way to go, Mr. Harper. :thumbsup

Libtard Trudeau and that NDP twit would open the floodgates and allow every third-world piece of shit in to our country, hand them our hard-earned health care...and every other perk they ask for...all to buy votes. :disgust

Trudeau wakes up and thanks that dead beach baby every morning.


Refugee crisis continues to dog Harper on campaign trail | Election 2015

Phoenix 09-09-2015 07:53 PM

The only reason to like the puppet

MiamiBoyz 09-09-2015 10:11 PM


JFK 09-09-2015 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 20575470)
The only reason to like the puppet

yup :thumbsup

MrBottomTooth 09-10-2015 04:10 AM

Sadly the polls have him way behind.

Martin 09-10-2015 05:18 AM

Canada takes on more than enough as it on the daily. Just go to your nearest public highschool.

Best-In-BC 09-10-2015 05:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20575711)
Sadly the polls have him way behind.

Sadly ? are you high ?

Crazyjose 09-10-2015 05:40 AM

Just Ban All Religion in the Country
 
Make Canada a country of Atheists and anyone who enters has to drop what ever religion they have and take Atheism classes.... and no turbans or burkas. OR go somewhere else :thumbsup

MrBottomTooth 09-10-2015 05:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Best-In-BC (Post 20575750)
Sadly ? are you high ?

No. I just don't like the idea of the liberals getting in after seeing how they've destroyed ontario.

_Richard_ 09-10-2015 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crazyjose (Post 20575757)
Make Canada a country of Atheists and anyone who enters has to drop what ever religion they have and take Atheism classes.... and no turbans or burkas. OR go somewhere else :thumbsup

you mean like communism?

EonBlue 09-10-2015 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20575711)
Sadly the polls have him way behind.

Yep, and one of tweedle-dee or tweedle-dumb get and completely fuck over the country where will all of the people with HDS (Harper derangement syndrome) be then? Likely in line to collect benefits behind all of the newly imported refugees.


.

BlackCrayon 09-10-2015 07:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20575760)
No. I just don't like the idea of the liberals getting in after seeing how they've destroyed ontario.

at this point harper seems like the only reasonable choice. trudeau doesn't have a clue and ndp are just socialists in disguise.

CDSmith 09-10-2015 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Best-In-BC (Post 20575750)
Sadly ? are you high ?

Speaking of getting high, this just arrived in my inbox this morning;

92CITI FM's Tweet of the Day: ?Elizabeth May (Green Party Leader) on legalizing marijuana: It will bring us $2 billion in our first year budget, providing a revenue stream to gov't.? ~@PnPCBC


At $2Bil per year they could slap it on our current deficit and have it payed off in 309 years.

:pimp:pimp

Sly 09-10-2015 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 20576134)
Speaking of getting high, this just arrived in my inbox this morning;

92CITI FM's Tweet of the Day: ?Elizabeth May (Green Party Leader) on legalizing marijuana: It will bring us $2 billion in our first year budget, providing a revenue stream to gov't.? ~@PnPCBC


At $2Bil per year they could slap it on our current deficit and have it payed off in 309 years.

:pimp:pimp

I make it a personal rule to never make big, important decisions, based on money. It always leads to bad places.

(Not a comment on legalization of marijuana, a comment on using money to justify a decision, right or wrong.)

SilentKnight 09-10-2015 01:30 PM

I see that Justin Trudeau is thinking of pulling out of an upcoming debate on foreign policy because its 'not french enough'.

Too bad his daddy never pulled out 43 years ago.

EonBlue 09-15-2015 10:32 AM

Here are the alternatives to Harper that some are serioulsy considering voting in:

- A party (NDP) whose backers want to turn Canada into some sort of socialist utopia (read hell hole).


Manifesto backed by NDP supporters calls for overhaul of capitalist economy


Quote:

Just as Tom Mulcair attempts to convince Canadians that the NDP is a safe, moderate choice in the Oct. 19 election, some of his party's highest profile supporters are issuing a manifesto calling for a radical restructuring of the country's economy.

The "leap manifesto," signed by more than 100 actors, musicians, labour unions, aboriginal leaders, environmentalists and other activists, aims to pressure the next federal government to wean Canada entirely off fossil fuels in as little as 20 years and, in the process, upend the capitalist system on which the economy is based.

[...]

In the process, the manifesto envisions a transformation of the entire capitalist system into a Utopia in which the economy is "in balance with the earth's limits," jobs "are designed to systematically eliminate racial and gender inequality," agriculture is "far more localized and ecologically based," and low-carbon sectors of the economy, like caregiving, teaching, social work, the arts and public-interest media, flourish.

- And the other party (Liberals) whose leader Justin Trudeau is indistinguishable from Zoolander.

Who said it? Justin Trudeau or Derek Zoolander?

:1orglaugh


If either of these parties get elected we are well and truly fucked.



.

MrBottomTooth 09-15-2015 10:49 AM

I like how trudeau is trying to say the fact we have a 1.9 billion dollar surplus is a bad thing.

EonBlue 09-15-2015 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20580240)
I like how trudeau is trying to say the fact we have a 1.9 billion dollar surplus is a bad thing.

It is a bad thing for him because he said he wouldn't balance the budget until 2019. That and budgets balance themselves. :1orglaugh


.

Sly 09-15-2015 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20580240)
I like how trudeau is trying to say the fact we have a 1.9 billion dollar surplus is a bad thing.

Sounds like a politician.

They are breed to spend every penny they have been given, and then more if they still want it. If there is leftovers, the question is "why? Why did you need more last year and now you don't?"

Spend it or lose it.

Looks like he's pushing for the loss.

_Richard_ 09-16-2015 01:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20580240)
I like how trudeau is trying to say the fact we have a 1.9 billion dollar surplus is a bad thing.

probably cause he understands keynesian theory? slightly relieving honestly

MrBottomTooth 09-16-2015 04:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 20580779)
probably cause he understands keynesian theory? slightly relieving honestly

Keynesian theory? Really? All I ever see him discussing is how he would have used the surplus to increase handouts to seniors, veterans, natives. That's fine and dandy, but at what point do you stop spending money you don't have?

Is that what Wynne is practicing in ontario? Keynesian theory? If so, someone needs to tell her Keynesian theory has got us a debt twice the size of California.

j3rkules 09-16-2015 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiamiBoyz (Post 20575525)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Sly 09-16-2015 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20580840)
Keynesian theory? Really? All I ever see him discussing is how he would have used the surplus to increase handouts to seniors, veterans, natives. That's fine and dandy, but at what point do you stop spending money you don't have?

Is that what Wynne is practicing in ontario? Keynesian theory? If so, someone needs to tell her Keynesian theory has got us a debt twice the size of California.

What happens is commitments would be based on this surplus. Those commitments don't go away. Once the commitment is in place, that's it, it's over, it's not coming back. It's like taxes. You fight taxes to the death because once they are in, they do not go away, regardless of if they are still needed.

Fast-forward 5 years and you no longer have the one time surplus. Then what?

There is nothing wrong with saving money for a rainy day. Be happy of the health of the status quo and SAVE.

Of course the other option when a surplus is on the table is to lower taxes. You won't catch a liberal throwing that out. ;-)

_Richard_ 09-16-2015 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20580840)
Keynesian theory? Really? All I ever see him discussing is how he would have used the surplus to increase handouts to seniors, veterans, natives. That's fine and dandy, but at what point do you stop spending money you don't have?

Is that what Wynne is practicing in ontario? Keynesian theory? If so, someone needs to tell her Keynesian theory has got us a debt twice the size of California.

i think you're not understanding what he is saying.. veterans etc didn't have all the money spent that they were earmarked to have.. they considered this 'savings' and goes towards creating this fake surplus.

mineistaken 09-16-2015 08:57 AM

Fucking do gooder libtards. Harper thinks logically, libtards irrationally.

SilentKnight 09-17-2015 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 20576138)
I make it a personal rule to never make big, important decisions, based on money. It always leads to bad places.

(Not a comment on legalization of marijuana, a comment on using money to justify a decision, right or wrong.)

I thought it was a comment on bartering with a one-eyed hooker.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123