![]() |
Breast cancer: Pills that cost 8 Cents could treat women with the illness, but not profitable
Eight cents pills already routinely prescribed to strengthen bones could save 1,000 lives a year if used to treat breast cancer, according to eagerly awaited new evidence.
However, experts have warned that unless the Government intervenes, many patients could miss out because the drugs are not licensed for use against cancer. The drugs, known as bisphosphonates, have been used for years to treat the bone-weakening condition osteoporosis. A new analysis of evidence from 18,766 patients, published in The Lancet medical journal, reveals that among post-menopausal women with breast cancer, the drugs reduced 10-year mortality risk by 18 per cent. About two thirds of all women with breast cancer could benefit from the drugs, and according to the leading research charity Breast Cancer Now, 34,000 women could benefit and their routine use could save up to 1,000 lives a year. Continued Breast cancer: Pills that cost 5p could treat women with the illness - Health News - Health & Families - The Independent |
twats. why does it matter? save the tatas
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now, in this thread, you are saying that a cheap pill can "POSSIBLY" be used to treat some forms of cancer because that plays along with the big bad pharma profit protecting conspiracy,.... AND therefore reason should the drug should not be subject to study, clinical trials etc before being approved for such an use because after all, why should clinical trials to guarantee safer drugs matter... and why should their efficacy and safety be proven? Really all you care about is your conspiracies and verbalizing your paranoid and anxiety. Makes perfect sense in Bizarro World. More crazy stuff from a confused and crazy mind. Love it! |
Follow the money :2 cents:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
In the USA the FDA just has to denote off-label use.
Etidronate disodium | definition of etidronate disodium by Medical dictionary Bisphosphonates (marketed as Actonel, Actonel+Ca, Aredia, Boniva, Didronel, Fosamax, Fosamax+D, Reclast, Skelid, and Zometa) Information A lot of side effects but as compared to breast cancer they are not so major. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Down Blouse Loving Cash |
Quote:
Your thread title is a lie and fabrication by you. Because you need to tell these lies constantly to quiet the constant paranoid and delusional chatter in your brain. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also, my dear self proclaimed researcher, words like "maybe" and "possibly" are pretty fucking important in research and certainly scream "THERE IS NO CONCLUSION HERE"... and say only "this is worth taking a further look at", yet as per usual, you've turned it into a well formed conspiracy because really all you do all day long is seek out info to support a pre-determined narrative and twist it to your liking, while ignoring anything that doesn't support your narrative. |
Then you haven't read the article, you missed the whole point. (but I know you're just trolling, I hope)
The conclusion is that nobody is going to bother pushing them because it won't make money. Quote:
|
Quote:
You readily make assumptions to support a narrative. Just because the author did as well, doesn't make you any less culpable for your own behavior. The article clearly doesn't state that any study has reached conclusions regarding the efficacy of the pill as a treatment, simply that it "may..." and "possibly.." and "might..." Do you need a dictionary? Or are you so insane that you translate "possible" into "with 100% absolute certainty" |
btw... not being a paranoid, delusional lunatic that never met a conspiracy i didn't like, as you... doesn't equate to "troll". Thats just another cop out for a weak and broken mind such as yours
|
Quote:
http://www.jimcarreyonline.com/image...ce-still02.jpg |
Quote:
|
Pills!!??
They are just trying to sterilize women, population control, illuminati, aliens, lizards. Do you dare to eat pills, even though you don't know what they have put into there? Come on.. By the way, from where you got the "not profitable" part? They sell it. It was about the licensing. I know that the development of antibiotics lack because it is not enough profitable, but not using something that is already there? Hospitals still use and describe the medicines, at least around here. You know, cheaper is better, unless it is corrupted doctor (there have been few of those too). EDIT: OK, in Murica everything is differently, but you know.. in developed countries.. or something like that. I forgot that insurance stuff and everything shit associated with it. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123