More Than 22,000 Brave Nurses Refusing to Submit to Mandatory Vaccinations

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wehateporn
    Promoting Debate on GFY
    • Apr 2007
    • 27176

    #1

    More Than 22,000 Brave Nurses Refusing to Submit to Mandatory Vaccinations


    Despite a CDC study that found mandatory vaccines for nurses offer no protection for patients, hospitals are pushing hard for forced vaccinations. Many nurses are choosing to lose their jobs rather than submit to forced mandatory flu vaccinations, and one has even sued the hospital, state, and federal governments for $100,000,000.

    (End All Disease) Nurses against Mandatory Vaccines (NAMV) was founded and formed by our CEO became alarmed when mandatory vaccination policies were being introduced into workplaces, and there seemed to be no rhyme or reason. First and foremost, NAMV is not anti-vaccine, but pro-choice when it comes to vaccination. We believe that all persons should have the right to choose and refuse medical treatment; that means nurses and healthcare workers alike.

    Continued More Than 22,000 Brave Nurses Refusing to Submit to Mandatory Vaccinations ยป The Event Chronicle
  • geedub
    Confirmed User
    • Jun 2005
    • 3489

    #2
    My cousin was told he needed a flu shot or would be forced to resign.. He's a radiologist.. Some things I understand but a flu shot, cmon.
    Reliable web host that actually cares, tell em geedub sent ya. Vacares

    Comment

    • Barry-xlovecam
      It's 42
      • Jun 2010
      • 18083

      #3
      Statistical Risk of Suffering a Severe Case of Vaccine-Preventable Disease | The S File ? -- Health

      In summary:

      The risk of a reaction from a single vaccine seems to be about 1 in 100,000. The risk that any one child will suffer a severe reaction over the entire twelve-year vaccine schedule is about 1 in 2600.
      The risk of any one person suffering a severe case of a vaccine-preventable disease each year in our entire population is about 1 in 1500.
      The risk of a child having a severe case of a vaccine-preventable disease is about 1 in 600 each year for all childhood diseases grouped together. This risk varies widely depending on the disease. Some disease risks are close to 0. Infant diseases are more risky than childhood ones.
      We don?t know the exact number of serious vaccine reactions, as many are likely to go unreported or are not recognized. We also don?t know how to factor in possible long-term, hidden effects of vaccines. If we someday can learn these numbers, the known vaccine risk may increase.
      So we come back to our original question: Are vaccines safe? Yes. Do they have severe side effects? yes. Are these severe side effects common? Not very. Is vaccinating to protect against all these diseases worth the risk of side effects? That?s the million-dollar question.
      Your chances of contracting a secondary disease of infection from hospitalizations or even from visits to busy doctor's offices and clinics are pretty good -- less than 1:300? if you count common colds, etc ... Safest thing is to go live in a cave in sackcloth

      Comment

      • CaptainHowdy
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Dec 2004
        • 94031

        #4
        Ok .........

        Comment

        • wehateporn
          Promoting Debate on GFY
          • Apr 2007
          • 27176

          #5
          Thanks for the link, it's good to see honest sites like this admitting that the risk of vaccines is unknown because it's unreported and unstudied, so hence they are simply shots in the dark, a game of vaccine roulette

          "We don?t know the exact number of serious vaccine reactions, as many are likely to go unreported or are not recognized. We also don?t know how to factor in possible long-term, hidden effects of vaccines. If we someday can learn these numbers, the known vaccine risk may increase."

          Originally posted by Barry-xlovecam
          Statistical Risk of Suffering a Severe Case of Vaccine-Preventable Disease | The S File ? -- Health



          Your chances of contracting a secondary disease of infection from hospitalizations or even from visits to busy doctor's offices and clinics are pretty good -- less than 1:300? if you count common colds, etc ... Safest thing is to go live in a cave in sackcloth

          Comment

          • michael.kickass
            Too lazy to set a custom title
            • Mar 2009
            • 11039

            #6
            Congratz to them, no one should be forced to do anything against his will.

            Threatening them to lose their jobs is just plain pathetic.
            NICERATIOS - $30 PPS - 50% Rev Share - 5% WM Referral - High Converting Sites!
            Any questions about your NICERATIOS account? Vanessa will take care of you: [email protected]

            Looking to expand your business in general, maybe sell your sites? Contact me:
            [email protected]

            Comment

            • ruff
              I have a plan B
              • Aug 2004
              • 5499

              #7
              Better living through chemistry. Nothing wrong with a flu shot. Is everybody looking to go back to the dark ages? Get some goddamn knowledge on the subject first.
              CryptoFeeds

              Comment

              • PR_Glen
                Confirmed User
                • Oct 2006
                • 9058

                #8
                Originally posted by ruff
                Better living through chemistry. Nothing wrong with a flu shot. Is everybody looking to go back to the dark ages? Get some goddamn knowledge on the subject first.
                hey, i hate anti vaxxors more than anyone but the 'knowledge' involved with flu shots is random at best. For the most part they are very ineffective and having to take them often is a bit much.
                webmaster at pimproll dot com

                Comment

                • pornmasta
                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                  • Jun 2006
                  • 19813

                  #9
                  It looks kind of irresponsible to me

                  Comment

                  • ruff
                    I have a plan B
                    • Aug 2004
                    • 5499

                    #10
                    Originally posted by PR_Glen
                    hey, i hate anti vaxxors more than anyone but the 'knowledge' involved with flu shots is random at best. For the most part they are very ineffective and having to take them often is a bit much.
                    Where do you get your information? Flu shots are extremely effective and have been for years. This is documented. So don't take any, nobody is making any of you take vaccines. Health care workers are sometimes required to take them. They know this up front. If they don't like it they can get another job. Ebola shows up in your neighborhood, you'll be first in line for a vaccine.
                    CryptoFeeds

                    Comment

                    • takethebluepill
                      So Fucking Banned
                      • Dec 2014
                      • 241

                      #11
                      GFY Auto Spell Check
                      Word in Title: Brave
                      Should Be: Stupid

                      Comment

                      • aka123
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jul 2014
                        • 4450

                        #12
                        ""We really don't have a good grip on the epidemiology of influenza in the healthcare setting," Kelley said.

                        Still, it?s clear that vaccination is the best strategy to minimize getting flu, he said. "It makes sense to vaccinate healthcare personnel. The evidence is just not as strong as most organization like to suggest, which this study highlights."

                        "It's the best intervention we currently have, so we need to keep using it while working toward a better flu vaccine," Kelley said."

                        Analysis finds limited evidence for HCW flu vaccination | CIDRAP

                        Comment

                        • czarina
                          Webmaster Extraordinaire
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 10751

                          #13
                          I agree with their position. I wouldn't let my employer dictate which vaccines I put into my body.

                          Comment

                          • aka123
                            Confirmed User
                            • Jul 2014
                            • 4450

                            #14
                            Originally posted by czarina
                            I agree with their position. I wouldn't let my employer dictate which vaccines I put into my body.
                            The job position dictates that. If you are secretary with the same employer, I am quite sure that there is no regulation about your vaccination.

                            Those nurses have known very well the requirements of the job.

                            Comment

                            • aka123
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jul 2014
                              • 4450

                              #15
                              About those brave nurses, can I ask why they do that? They probably still take the other required vaccines, right? Is it really worth it to lose a job for a flu shot? They most likely give the same shots for their patients. At least in here they do.

                              That is a bit like "Brave porn webmasters against porn. Yeah, take from that bitches!"

                              Comment

                              • aka123
                                Confirmed User
                                • Jul 2014
                                • 4450

                                #16
                                Originally posted by MrBottomTooth
                                I have to put up with this crap too. (Not a nurse but work in health care). Our employees are given the option not to take it, but if they don't take it and they get the flu they either have to take Tamiflu pills, or stay away from work for 2 weeks. Most people can't afford to miss work for 2 weeks so about 90% of them get it.
                                It is crap that you can't work as a sick in health care?

                                Comment

                                • Jman
                                  Already an AI veteran
                                  • Sep 2003
                                  • 22832

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by ruff
                                  Where do you get your information? Flu shots are extremely effective and have been for years. This is documented. So don't take any, nobody is making any of you take vaccines. Health care workers are sometimes required to take them. They know this up front. If they don't like it they can get another job. Ebola shows up in your neighborhood, you'll be first in line for a vaccine.
                                  Last year flu shot in Quebec WAS NOT effective and that was announced and documented by actual doctors.

                                  Medscape: Medscape Access

                                  Another Epic Fail for Influenza Vaccine

                                  Ask google and you will get more documentation
                                  Orkestrait NSFW AI
                                  FantasyXXX.AI
                                  Email: [email protected] TG: @jman1216

                                  Comment

                                  • ruff
                                    I have a plan B
                                    • Aug 2004
                                    • 5499

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by Jman
                                    Last year flu shot in Quebec WAS NOT effective and that was announced and documented by actual doctors.

                                    Medscape: Medscape Access

                                    Another Epic Fail for Influenza Vaccine

                                    Ask google and you will get more documentation
                                    Do you know why the flu shot was not effective? Because the virus mutated so fast that the shot was NOT as effective. Don't take a flu shot, who cares? Do you think vaccines cause autism? Did you get a polio shot? You can't even go to school in the US without required vaccination shots. Flu vaccine is the least of your worries. You're either in or your out.
                                    CryptoFeeds

                                    Comment

                                    • wehateporn
                                      Promoting Debate on GFY
                                      • Apr 2007
                                      • 27176

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by MrBottomTooth

                                      Either take Tamiflu or miss 2 weeks of work if you haven't had your flu shot . The most pathetic thing is I can't remember the last time they got the flu strain right. The shit they pump into us is completely useless more often than not.
                                      Really strange that they're still pushing Tamiflu given that it's been admitted it doesn't work

                                      What the Tamiflu saga tells us about drug trials and big pharma | Business | The Guardian

                                      Comment

                                      • aka123
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Jul 2014
                                        • 4450

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by MrBottomTooth
                                        The norm when you're sick is to miss a few days at most and collect your sick pay. Not be forced out of work for 2 weeks straight which is ridiculous.
                                        Is few days enough to make you not contagious? As the issue in here is not about you being able to work, the issue is that you don't spread it around.

                                        Comment

                                        • MiamiBoyz
                                          fgfdftre6
                                          • Oct 2012
                                          • 6688

                                          #21
                                          You just KNOW those nurses are fucking each other with strap on dildos when they should be helping to prevent disease!

                                          What a shameful disgrace to the uniform indeed!

                                          Comment

                                          • celandina
                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                            • Jun 2006
                                            • 11714

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by takethebluepill
                                            GFY Auto Spell Check
                                            Word in Title: Brave
                                            Should Be: Stupid

                                            Right on !!

                                            Belongs right in with the with the "Flat Earth Society" folks and those who want Trump as a President.

                                            Comment

                                            Working...