So which performer got HIV?
 

:(
Sucks.

Tell me you've read the information already released...
http://www.xbiz.com/news/184178
So you know nothing has been announced...because further testing is all still going on.
So how would random GFY people "just magically know"?
LOL!

We at GFY are not random we run this industry.

;-p

someone who had sex with a tranny from Brazil like usual:2 cents: Just a guess.

I have to say that the moment I saw the condom law was shelved in California...I had a feeling that suddenly there would be another HIV case.

That guy Weinstein and his AHF are just relentless in trying to bring down the porn biz.

You know, all you have to do is go test at a PASS testing center, you don't really need any credentials proving you are in the industry. Which means that any random person can just go there and test. And if they come up positive...the FSC will call for a moratorium.

I wouldn't be surprised if Weinstein didn't send a girl (not even a girl in the industry) who already has HIV to one of their testing centers.
That's all it takes.

And then he can come back at California and say: "See! We need that condom law"

That's pure speculation on my part. But it does seem awfully coincidental that this happened a week or so after the condom law failed.

That guy Weinstein has put millions into that effort.
And since anybody can test with PASS...it would be easy to pull a stunt.

Again, just pure speculation on my part...but it wouldn't surprise me.

its well known who the performer is. That got out quickly.

no indication of her working with crossovers but these days who knows.. she is a pretty popular girl but relatively new and she is all over the escort sites

:2 cents: I would not doubt it.

so who was it?
why not answer and leave trail of crumbs?

pls drop some of your infinite knowledge for us losers not in the know.

who was it?

can we at least wait until the retest is done before we burn the witch at a stake?

we've already seen Weinstein and ahf make up 'facts about infection' and then south and the 'media' repeat them as truth .. wouldn't be surprised at all in your supposition :2 cents:

Pfft, stop it with your responsible, innocent-until-proven-guilty approach.

captain save a hoe. you are not so bright , are you?
"its well known who the performer is. That got out quickly."

and who's burning at the stake, i just asked for the name.
being a producer id like to fucking know who supposedly has hiv in the industry.

is that ok you pudgy oompaloompa ,do gooder.

ok, i know we had a misunderstanding recently, can we put this behind us please? no need for personal insults.

as a producer I know that no one from the first generation will be working right now, so it's not a risk that you book someone from that accidentally

but there is still a chance that it is a false positive and there is no need to post the name (even if a few people know it already) on a message board before it's officially confirmed.

and "burning the witch at a stake" was obviously an analogy - imagine you have a false positive and your name is out there for everyone to read for the rest of your life - even if it was not true at the end. your life is ruined.

and thanks for adding additional insults in your edit

i fully understand what burning at the stake means, mob mentality , ganging up and attacking.
typical gfy behavior, and all of which Imo are traits of morons.

so .... stop making character questioning assumptions in regards to my posts and we should be chill just like before you called me out here on gfy for stealing content when i clearly bought it from you.


its pretty simple imo.

thanks.

ok, deal...

Nobody...
http://www.xbiz.com/news/184221 <<<

Very well said and as it turns out, you are correct. Much respect to you my friend.


Just Dave

Yes this!!!

Awesome glad it was false.

But damn still curious who it was....

But, what difference would it make to know...they still actually have a clean test.
:thumbsup

i rest in my case

Pls do rest in a case a for a while. Lol

I never said u were wrong.
A witch hunt attacking the parties would have been wrong. But you were off base suggestimg that simply wanting to know the name of a person in a highly public issue was a witch hunt which is commonly defined as a group attack on an individual.

Could one simply want to know the parties involved?
No that is implausible.