Fuck you Ruth Bader Ginsburg
 

She is siding with the pro-life wacknuts in her latest opinion and she won't fucking retire while we have a sane President in office?

Fuck off lady - it's time to go.

btw - You've been great but see ya

parking here.........

I believe people have the right to the pursuit of happiness, and we should not try to influence others in their decisions.

For example, there is no legitimate reason for gays to marry. It might be against the rules of some religions, but that's really irrelevant - Leviticus tells us the touching of a dead pig makes us unclean yet we still play football, ironically on Sundays.

At the same time, it's none of anyone's business what a woman decides to do with their bodies. Your religion does not dictate how my wife or my girlfriend live their lives.

The ego of this woman is astonishing - listening to her say" As long as my mind is sharp I will continue to serve"

You are 81 lady. You think your mind will be sharp through 8 years of a Republican President (thats 10 years out she will be 91)

The potential...peril...that that her successor be named by a Rand Paul or a Ted Cruz is so great - would be such a calamity...would be an all out disaster. The SCOTUS balance tipped to the right and this country will reverse every bit of progress we have made in the last 70 years.

But her ego tells her to ignore this potential catasterfuck because HEY EVERYONE MY MIND IS STILL STRONG! We know it is woman, we get it...now please don't fuck this country over just to prove it.

http://news.yahoo.com/katie-couric-i...185027624.html

Why does society's bottom fear Rand Paul and Ted Cruz?

Ginsburg's failure to conclude as much on her own doesn't speak well of her allegedly still sharp mind.

She knows..but her ego trumps the political apocalypse she knows she may cause if Hillary doesnt win.

12 Clicks calling me societies bottom - haha thats funny coming from a guy who x-sells (pre-checked/blind) kids games on adult sites...there has never been anyone more bottom feeder than 12 Clicks on GFY.

If she were an aging man on the bench, would you have the same opinion?

I'm looking forward to the day Scalia stops breathing.

wait, she should step down because she might make a decision at some point over the next 9 years that the op finds disagreeable and she'll then croak enabling a more dimwitted than BO president to appoint an even more dimwitted SC judge than the 91 year old Ginsburg?


got it.

YES

and...

are you fucking serious with that question?

Considering how his mental capacity is so diminished at his [apparently] young age, perhaps. And the LAST thing we need is Obama appointing anyone else to the SCOTUS

There are 3 male judges on the bench who were also born in the 1930's and 2 male judges who are less than a Presidential term of age difference.

Tax advantages, property ownership & child custody rights are all legitimate reasons for two people to marry, whoever the fuck they are, aside from loving, and being committed to eachother of course :2 cents:

You do not have to be married to own property

Ruth Ginsburg's career is long and distinguished, just like my johnson.

Can't answer the question, eh loser?

I'm too lazy to look it up, but...

If those elderly male judges are Republican appointees, they obviously won't elect to retire while there's a Democrat in the White House.

If any of them are Democratic appointees, then yeah the same argument that applies to Ginsburg would clearly apply to them as well.

Are you really arguing that supreme court justices should be polítically biased and motivated to martyr their caeers to pack the court with their approved polítical Party?

This thread. Dang.

SCOTUS is bought and paid for by the same corporations that own POTUS and all the other TUS's. There is no Democrat and Republican, just Ford and Chevy, Coke and Pepsi, Chase and B of A, etc.

Um, what siding is she doing? She spoke out against Roe vs Wade over a year ago.

Her latest opinion that she gave was about her marriage.

And being 81 is a problem for you? So you are basing your prejudices according to age?

Based on your post, I would conclude your IQ somewhere in the mid 90's given that you at least can type.

And I wouldn't call what we have for a president sane.

Progressives don't seem to love the country, they're trying to change everything and things are not getting better....

Corporations being legally defined as people was where it all went to shit. I can see how they arrived at that conclusion although.

The funny thing is corporations are much easier to protest than the government, everybody whines about them on their iphones over ATT lines while sipping a Coke they bought at Walmart, without realizing we put the money in their pockets that they use to lobby, bribe and derail democracy.

If they don't want to see their decisions overturned by a subsequent court majority they will very likely consider doing just that.

It all comes down to what their personal priorities are of course.

Pretty sure at their ages and with all the NSA revelations their priorities are not letting their browser histories become part of their legacies.

I stopped reading at sane President.

She should be put down like a rabid dog.

Supreme Court Justices are appointed for life, precisely so they don't play political games.

You are too lazy to look up how many elderly men are on the court or who appointed them, but you care enough about an elderly woman having a job that you had to make an angry thread demanding her resignation and swearing in indignation?

Kinda hilariously bigoted on your part.

But really, this post sums up what an appropriate understanding of the function of the Judicial Branch looks like.

GFY has always felt that way.

Hey don't shoot the messenger. This ain't my thread :1orglaugh

I was just offering an opinion.

And for the record, methinks the OP's suggestion re Ginsberg should apply equally to any elderly male centrist or left leaning justices.

Oops. My bad. You weren't the original poster. Sorry about that.

i can't decide whats dumber, your bitcoin 7500 call or a ted cruz becoming president being a concern to you.

your competing with yourself for GFY retard of the year.

:)

popcorn anybody?

ah Amelia you had so many things with which to disagree with me on RBG and you went for the bigot route - you could not be further off base...your rambling nonsensical OCD mumbles in other threads indicate a woman running on intellectual reserves...your tank just aint all full girl.

A lot of people are railing for the resignation of RBG (now, before the midterms when the nuts could take over the nut house) and NONE of the critics of the people with my position has ever said it has anything to do with misogyny.

http://www.thegreenpapers.com/Hx/SupremeCourt.html

If you knew anything about this issue before jumping up and doin your blowhard thing you would know that NONE of the other Justices are IN PLAY for a possible resignation - in other words there is little possibility of any of them EXCEPT RBG leaving the bench. There hasn't been the slightest discussion of any of their health or age issues other than RBG - she's the oldest and frailest, a few years back she had one of the deadliest known forms of cancer (pancreatic).


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...rt_US_2010.jpg

she looks ready to be mummified in that photo....81 pffft, but yea, I'm hilariously bigoted and only want her to step down because shes a woman. I'm pro ALL Womens issues and LOVE Kagen...boy did you pick the wrong dude to call a bigot..Do you often look for patterns where none exist? Your victim complex is showing.

Yeah, sexists prefer to think of women as victims.

What is "running on intellectual reserves"?

What does "in play" mean with regards to a Supreme Court Justice? They are appointed for life and are not supposed to play political games. Not dead is not dead.

What is the worst illness battled by each of the THREE men on the Court also born in the 1930's?

Sorry for the questions, but I'm just a dumb girl.

living in the inner city I have a lot of black friends, and most of them have a very realistic grasp of the machinations of racism in peoples minds, which sadly in 2014 is still very prevalent...but there is always 1 or 2 who see EVERYTHING through that lens of prejudice, ANY slight or rudeness from ANYONE and "It's because I'm black!" - that's you - trying hard in vain to see sexism where none exists - ignoring all the logic and just screaming misogyny.

Your "dumb girl" comment is just doubling down on your bigot post I thoroughly debunked...so not going to bother with your questions because obviously you are just that.

Did you seriously just congratulate yourself for having black friends and call me a dumb girl (again)? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

So you can't define "running on intellectual reserves"?

You don't even know what you mean by "in play"?

You surely don't know anything about the health history of any men on the Court.

Where is the logic for you thinking you are not sexist? What women's issues are you so awesome on?

Most people that live in the middle city, stay in the middle city and have a very narrow view of the overall state of people through out the US. They blame instead of fix and forge forward. Thus they never leave the inner city.

Their concepts of racism is feed to them by those that profit from it, AKA Al Sharpton, instead of learning to grow through acceptance, AKA Martin Luther King jr.

No problem :)

jesus ok last time I respond to you ever so enjoy :)

cute snipe using the word "congratulate" I'm sure you're hoping others will recognize your cleverness!

"Runnin on reserves" is a household known phrase, ages old...you are embarrassing yourself to ask what it means. And you forgot the rest of the quote which makes it's meaning even MORE obvious: "running on intellectual reserves...your tank just aint all full girl." we good on that?

ok "In Play" really??? I have to explain that to you to? Finish High School? When a Supreme Court Justice is thinking about or being moved towards retirement for reasons such as health, age etc...it's KNOWN, it's DISCUSSED..often YEARS out, they don't just put in their 2 weeks notice haha - "In Play" for retirement means it's a possibility and it's a HUGE deal politically and HELL YES they factor in who the the sitting president is when planning retirement - the next oldest Justice (conservative maniac Scalia) would NEVER retire under a Democratic President. The court is a VERY politicized body anyone saying it's not is a fool.

Your question "Where is the logic for you thinking you are not sexist?" is by far the strangest thing you have said so far...I SO debunked every reason you had for hanging me with the sexist label and instead of debating any point I made you are now asking me to prove (by stating which womens issues I'm for) that I'm not sexist hahahaha I'm now afraid you might be a little more than dumb, you might be a little crazy..but good luck to you and sayonara! :1orglaugh

Maybe in your mind it's debunked, you have yet to prove anything!

Thinking that one of the most respected members of GFY is dumb, merely proves you are nothing but an insect and only prattle on about the nonsense going on in your head.

So you - one of the most repulsive Fox News brainwashed far right nuts on GFY - one of the most hated trolls here - think shes well respected and your opinion is supposed to carry weight? Maybe she is well respected, that say a LOT about the mentality level of this sewer. I have read her incoherent ramblings in other threads...so nice try.

What is there to prove - that I'm not sexist? EVERYONE on the progressive side wants her to step down, men and women alike want her to retire now..no one would call out sexism on this unless brand new to the issue. There is basically NO possibility that ANY of the other justices may retire anytime soon - there is one person on the bench being asked to go (she actually said she would probably retire in 2012) and she just happens to be female.

Now shes on Katie Couric and other news shows BECAUSE so many of us want her to step down - and she uses her airtime to say Roe v Wade is fundamentally unconstitutional? WTF RBG.

In case anyone doesn't know what will happen to this country if she retires under a Republican President - well Roe would vanish, abortion would be illegal in 25 plus states - civil rights act scrapped, voting rights gone, ACA gone, immigration reform never..the disaster that is Citizens United would become entrenched...marriage equality see ya..on and on.

It's SO important that she goes - would be exactly the same outcry if she were male.