Modifying content
 

I've heard a lot of content providers getting pissed off when webmasters altered content, doing things such as morphing it and the likes.

Now, maybe an odd question, but are there any content providers that have a problem with webmasters enhancing content? E.g. removing butt pimples, shaving bumps, zits, clearing up a girl's complexion, etc.

if they do they are idiots. Photoshop til ya drop :thumbsup

i dunno about the monster cock stuff though, maybe for something that major you should check out if it's ok. Dunno why it wouldn't but maybe some people are fussy.

I should not imagine any content provider complaining about you removing a few zits and generally improving the image.

But doesn't your present supplier do that for you already?

Dont see a problem in it unless its extreme modifications.
Like attaching a dick to her forhead :1orglaugh

Well, this is actually about some of your content (which, except for some butt pimples on the girl in question, is fucking <b>great</b>, as is most of your content).

Besides that, I made this post because I was a bit curious as to how far one can go with enhancements more generally speaking - I've seen examples of ugly amateurs turned into beautiful playboy-like models with some photoshop work.

Are most of the bigcock pics fakes?

No. There are thousands of guys walking around with cocks that are over two feet long.

WHOOPS should have kept quiet about that.

What is the set number, better still email me, I'm having a BUTT kicking session tomorrow.