Roughly speaking, the weight of an entity increases with the cube of linear dimensions.
To support this weight you would expect the leg bones to be much thicker in proportion yet we do not see this in these illustrations. There would also need to be a much more powerful heart.
Perhaps gravity has changed or fakes have been made.
Conspiracy response:
Quote:
Since they have hidden the finds so that none can see them, the illustrations are not much more than artistic license.
Critic:
Quote:
The author cites a 2002 National Geographic article and implies that the giant cyclops skeletons found in ancient Greece were human-like in origin.
They were of a species related to elephants. And they were not actual cyclops but rather there was a large hole in the skull.
These really have nothing to do with giant humans. They only help to illustrate that ancient myths might have been supported by or created by fossils found by ancient peoples.
Another writer questioned the reliability of using "legends" as "fact" to try and make a point, and wondered if the source researched or knew if the data had been peer-reviewed (to check it's reliability):
Quote:
Hi, do these discoveries articles, reports and documents have Peer-Reviewed reports, articles and/documents?
Because there are many scholars claiming that it is all fake and that there is no Peer- Reviewed reports, journals , articles and documents supporting this as strong factual evidence.
The Conspiracy Theorist response:
Quote:
IMO, peer review reports don't mean squat.
What difference does it make if a bunch of old know-it-all farts agree on something or not.
Who's to say what they have been taught, brainwashed or believe is truth? When it comes down to brass tacks, it's all guesswork.
Since the article cited by the OP is from a fringe site, and the article is well over a year old, I'm guessing that it is a slow conspiracy day. :upsidedow
The kooks are lagging - haven't heard much conspiracy chatter about the Santa Barbara shootings (yet).
Here, this should keep WHP busy for awhile... :1orglaugh
:stoned
ADG
Bourke
05-27-2014 09:39 PM
"Peer review don't mean squat"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Idiot
Yngwie
05-27-2014 09:47 PM
well yes, the giants lived all the way at the top of the beanstalk at least until Jack came along and fucked shit up. LOL ;)
Another writer questioned the reliability of using "legends" as "fact" to try and make a point, and wondered if the source researched or knew if the data had been peer-reviewed (to check it's reliability):
Since the article cited by the OP is from a fringe site, and the article is well over a year old, I'm guessing that it is a slow conspiracy day. :upsidedow
The kooks are lagging - haven't heard much conspiracy chatter about the Santa Barbara shootings (yet).
Here, this should keep WHP busy for awhile... :1orglaugh
:stoned
ADG
omg i just spit my cola :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
EngineCash
05-28-2014 03:11 AM
When you post some pictures like that one, this really can be true... :)
Chosen
05-28-2014 04:00 AM
They probably did, but I don't really see how it can affect our lives today.
