every now and then you get to shoot a natural beauty
 

straight from the camera, just a resize....

http://www.wanton.com/today.jpg

Oh. Uhm.

Moar?

:D

Very nice

Very pretty.

Alright man... holding out on the knockers is not cool. I desperately need to see those. She is beautiful.

hot, totally diggin the underboobage tease but yeah, I'm with DWB, gotta see those sweet tiddas plz.!

Ditto. Rinse repeat. Yes. Agree. WTF.

:D

does she have kids?

Cute :thumbsup

I've seen the knockers and they are good.

Let's see them.

nice model dude!

rihanna? ;)

"Natural" beauty with tats.....ok.
PS: fugly.

She appears to be angry

Hot! She reminds me of Rihanna.

I think you don't quite understand what the term "natural beauty" means. And the lady is far from fugly but I understand that something like this could be quite subjective.

very hot lady thanks you get my wolf up

If, by "natural beauty" you meant bored and pissed off looking slag with tats, then I agree.

I have to agree with you there...

no tits pic ???

you don't have much of an eye :2 cents:

Tats are a turn off but the lips look good and I bet the tits are just as nice.

show us more you bastard

Unleash those puppies!

She sure is a cutie. Now lets see the good stuff damn it!

She is sexy ... in a grumpy cat kinda way.

If you only come across models like this now and then I would suggest you contact an agency or travel to Eastern Europe.

Not trying to hate, but she looks kind of like a tranny. Maybe it's just this one picture, though.

I think the low angle of the lens makes her look a little bit "amazon". She is very pretty, I would like to see more shots and with less clothes.

if you think an agency will provide an attractive porn model you're way off base and I've shot many many many Slavic women :2 cents:

i don't see the beauty :upsidedow

Thats what my first thought was as well. Come to think of it I think it is a Tarp :1orglaugh

give us moar of her beauty!

Is it a trap?

high fashion is typically shot low angel

more more more

I keep thinking it is.

she looks angry

If you won't show us the boobs, then maybe one where she looks a little happier?

that's as much high fashion as she is a natural beauty.

unless walmart is now high fashion?

Where are those titties?

I have to agree; "she" looks too manly for this to not be a man.

Hmm. I know you have me on ignore, but just FYI - what you apparently think is "high fashion", is not.

It is "in the gheeeeettoooooo"

http://www.cinemaerotique.com/pp/CinemaEgirl031.jpghttp://www.cinemaerotique.com/pp/CinemaEgirl038.jpg

Average girl from agency

http://www.cinemaerotique.com/pp/Kayla_Louise021.jpg
Model from Internet

http://www.cinemaerotique.com/pp/CinemaEgirl009.jpg
Average Polish Girl

http://www.cinemaerotique.com/pp/CinemaEgirl010.jpghttp://www.cinemaerotique.com/pp/CinemaEgirl015.jpg
Another Ugly girl from Agency

http://www.cinemaerotique.com/pp/KamZuz361.jpg

More girls from agency that don't reach your high standards

what the fuck is wrong with you? do you actually think I'll drive 7000 fucking miles to use some polish agency? and some of those girls you posted were NOT that great looking by any means. we have a saying down home ... 'can't tell shit from beans' pretty sure you qualify :2 cents: