Weather Channel Co-Founder Slams Climate Report: ?total distortion of the data and agenda driven'
 

’600 page litany of doom’: Weather Channel Co-Founder John Coleman slams Federal climate report: A ‘total distortion of the data and agenda driven, destructive episode of bad science gone berserk’


Full story http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/05/...-gone-berserk/

"Coleman: 'When the temperature data could no longer be bent to support global warming, they switched to climate change and now blame every weather and climate event on CO2 despite the hard, cold fact that the “radiative forcing” theory they built their claims on has totally failed to verify.'

'The current bad science is all based on a theory that the increase in the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from the exhaust of the burning of fossil fuels leads to a dramatic increase in “the greenhouse effect” causing temperatures to skyrocket uncontrollably. This theory has failed to verify and is obviously dead wrong. But the politically funded and agenda driven scientists who have built their careers on this theory and live well on the 2.6 billion dollars of year of Federal grants for global warming/climate change research cling to this theory and bend the data spread to support the glorified claims in their reports and papers.'"

Continued http://www.climatedepot.com/2014/05/...-gone-berserk/

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:thumbsup

this cartoon highlights the problem

1. People don't change their personal behaviors for pie in the sky concepts like saving a tree somewhere. they change behavior for themselves, if global warming alarmists want to change behavior, they are going about it the entirely wrong way.

2. due to the complete politicization of the topic, people are now compelled to make a decision on it based on their personal politics (see#1), so global alarmists have effectively isolated out the non-alarmists from changing due to embracing a political component of the concept.

I might be a bit less skeptical if the invariable government response wasn't "We need to raise taxes and increase regulation to combat this ___________ menace!"