![]() |
SE question
Are sites that are dynamically generated using something like index.php?sid=x123&link=blah less likely to get indexed by search engines, in comparison to the good old www.domain.com/folder1/page23.html ?
Please throw a little light on that, please :thumbsup |
the depth to which dynamic pages will be indexed depends on pr.
|
your better off having the script generate static pages than go completely dynamic
|
Quote:
let's say the entire hierarchy would only be ... hmm ... three levels deep. Would the PR still matter? I'm asking cuz I want to dynamically create pages and I hope to get some SE exposure due to massive amounts of text used... :helpme |
I think (and I have nothing to back this up except for a few isolated cases on my sites) that if you use an .html extension instead of a .php extension your dynamic pages will stand a better chance of being indexed.
Again, I could be wrong, and I have zilch for data, but I've had dynamic pages that use .html extensions with a ?var=data type stuff after the page get indexed. (www.domain.com/page.html?var=data for example) |
Quote:
|
No reason you can't pass parameters that look like directories for a dynamic site.
Instead of this: http://www.example.com/something?name1=value1&name2=value2 Do this: http://www.example.com/something/name1/value1/name2/value2/ Amazon used to do it this way.. now they seem to have some kind of mix. |
ah ok, and that's simply a matter of setting in the htaccess, right? I mean, recognizing html files as php and vise versa, correct?
|
Quote:
|
btw, like I said, it was just from my personal observations on a few of my sites.
I could be way wrong. :thumbsup |
They index dynamic urls, they don't follow them.
Nothing beats a static url, the spiders will follow them through. The best thing to do is use dynamic pages behind static urls. |
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123