GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   How to legally obtain Names of IP addresses (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1136512)

bean-aid 03-21-2014 04:58 PM

How to legally obtain Names of IP addresses
 
What methods currently exist to obtain the information of the owner of an IP on a certain date? Does it require a court order or is there something more simple? And obviously which country may have different laws... just trying to see what options currently exist.

Colmike9 03-21-2014 05:00 PM

Phish some ISP tech support and hope you get a new guy..(It's easy to search that info for them)

Edit: Oh, legally...

HomerSimpson 03-21-2014 05:11 PM

buy the lists from domaintools.com ?

bean-aid 03-21-2014 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HomerSimpson (Post 20023510)
buy the lists from domaintools.com ?

I know the ISP... how to find the First/Last name of user of that IP on certain date?

Domaintools has that information?

pornmasta 03-21-2014 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beaner (Post 20023518)
I know the ISP... how to find the First/Last name of user of that IP on certain date?

Domaintools has that information?

impossible for here

WDF 03-21-2014 05:55 PM

Contact a lawyer and have him subpoena the assignment logs for the date and time of the event.

That's how you do it legally.

You realize this will only get you the subscribers info and they will dispute it was them connected.

bean-aid 03-21-2014 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WDF (Post 20023550)
Contact a lawyer and have him subpoena the assignment logs for the date and time of the event.

That's how you do it legally.

You realize this will only get you the subscribers info and they will dispute it was them connected.

Likely the subscriber info would match credit card receipt. Im not talking about illegaly downloading people, i am talking about those who illegaly chargeback to not pay for something they bought.

And i think as a merchant, we have a lot more pull then we think.

Colmike9 03-21-2014 06:03 PM

Whoever allows the chargeback should be trained to be less lenient.. Why is it the subscriber's fault?

bean-aid 03-21-2014 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colmike7 (Post 20023558)
Whoever allows the chargeback should be trained to be less lenient.. Why is it the subscriber's fault?

?? The subscriber is who charged back.

2-4 trial join initiated by subscriber
2-7 rebill
2-16 monthly join initiated by subscriber *again*

All of it charged back. Why should the merchant *me* pay all the fees associated with this guy either 1) fucked up and has no clue he joined the site twice as well as joined a trial to subscription or 2) knows he joined and uses chargeback tools to not pay.

Either way, it's fraud. Knowing full well it is fraud or just being dumb fraud... still fraud.

In general, credit card holders are abusing their rights by claiming fraud knowing full well nothing will happen.

I had a $990 chargeback on my mainstream site a couple months back. The guy actually lives in my state and I am going to file a small claims suit against him.

I think globally, some ISP's, local authorities, etc. could be brought into the mix and used to merchant advantages. Just asking the questions though... i'm fairly certain most just write chargebacks off as cost of doing business.

klinton 03-21-2014 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beaner (Post 20023518)
I know the ISP... how to find the First/Last name of user of that IP on certain date?

Domaintools has that information?

not that possible for things like this

JuicyBunny 03-21-2014 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beaner (Post 20023562)
?? The subscriber is who charged back.

2-4 trial join initiated by subscriber
2-7 rebill
2-16 monthly join initiated by subscriber *again*

All of it charged back. Why should the merchant *me* pay all the fees associated with this guy either 1) fucked up and has no clue he joined the site twice as well as joined a trial to subscription or 2) knows he joined and uses chargeback tools to not pay.

Either way, it's fraud. Knowing full well it is fraud or just being dumb fraud... still fraud.

In general, credit card holders are abusing their rights by claiming fraud knowing full well nothing will happen.

I had a $990 chargeback on my mainstream site a couple months back. The guy actually lives in my state and I am going to file a small claims suit against him.

I think globally, some ISP's, local authorities, etc. could be brought into the mix and used to merchant advantages. Just asking the questions though... i'm fairly certain most just write chargebacks off as cost of doing business.

Put him in collections, ban his card. Advise his credit card company as well he is banned for fraud. Not for some expected action on their part just give them notice. And be relentless in collections if it is your product he e-frauded you for. He gets enough of those, he'll wake up perhaps.

Paully 03-21-2014 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beaner (Post 20023562)
?? The subscriber is who charged back.

2-4 trial join initiated by subscriber
2-7 rebill
2-16 monthly join initiated by subscriber *again*

All of it charged back. Why should the merchant *me* pay all the fees associated with this guy either 1) fucked up and has no clue he joined the site twice as well as joined a trial to subscription or 2) knows he joined and uses chargeback tools to not pay.

Either way, it's fraud. Knowing full well it is fraud or just being dumb fraud... still fraud.

In general, credit card holders are abusing their rights by claiming fraud knowing full well nothing will happen.

I had a $990 chargeback on my mainstream site a couple months back. The guy actually lives in my state and I am going to file a small claims suit against him.

I think globally, some ISP's, local authorities, etc. could be brought into the mix and used to merchant advantages. Just asking the questions though... i'm fairly certain most just write chargebacks off as cost of doing business.

You're a fucking billing genius.

What are you gonna say to Judge Judy when the subscriber says. *My* *minor* *child* *used* *my* *card* *without* *my* *permission* *?*

Diomed 03-21-2014 06:49 PM

So fucking billed mang :thumbsup

Paully 03-21-2014 06:58 PM

"I'm so fed up I feel like kicking myself in the cunt. Next step for beaner is creating my own gateway and working direct with gfy to find out what the fuck to do next. Then I'm gonna sit back while beaner tells everyone how fucking stupid they are for using billing companies that have figured his current problems out years ago. Fucking adult needs something big time... all of you are getting screwed left and right and have no idea which homeless parolee Swirlygirl is being knocked up by right now."

ChargeBacks 03-21-2014 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beaner (Post 20023556)
Likely the subscriber info would match credit card receipt. Im not talking about illegaly downloading people, i am talking about those who illegaly chargeback to not pay for something they bought.

And i think as a merchant, we have a lot more pull then we think.

You do. :2 cents: It is not an easy task, but you can line up information that sways the banks decision in your favor, and on the occasion it fails, you have the documentation to pursue the consumer post chargeback.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Colmike7 (Post 20023558)
Whoever allows the chargeback should be trained to be less lenient.. Why is it the subscriber's fault?

Banks allow this. The banks rule in favor of the consumer more than 70% of the time, even when the consumer has failed to demonstrate that they are indeed the victims.

Quote:

Originally Posted by beaner (Post 20023562)
?? The subscriber is who charged back.

2-4 trial join initiated by subscriber
2-7 rebill
2-16 monthly join initiated by subscriber *again*

All of it charged back. Why should the merchant *me* pay all the fees associated with this guy either 1) fucked up and has no clue he joined the site twice as well as joined a trial to subscription or 2) knows he joined and uses chargeback tools to not pay.

Either way, it's fraud. Knowing full well it is fraud or just being dumb fraud... still fraud.

In general, credit card holders are abusing their rights by claiming fraud knowing full well nothing will happen.

I had a $990 chargeback on my mainstream site a couple months back. The guy actually lives in my state and I am going to file a small claims suit against him.

I think globally, some ISP's, local authorities, etc. could be brought into the mix and used to merchant advantages. Just asking the questions though... i'm fairly certain most just write chargebacks off as cost of doing business.

:2 cents::2 cents:

Markul 03-22-2014 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paully (Post 20023574)
"I'm so fed up I feel like kicking myself in the cunt. Next step for beaner is creating my own gateway and working direct with gfy to find out what the fuck to do next. Then I'm gonna sit back while beaner tells everyone how fucking stupid they are for using billing companies that have figured his current problems out years ago. Fucking adult needs something big time... all of you are getting screwed left and right and have no idea which homeless parolee Swirlygirl is being knocked up by right now."

That made me lol :thumbsup

Paully 03-22-2014 02:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Markul (Post 20023768)
That made me lol :thumbsup

I was starting to think my hard work went wasted. Thanks Markul:thumbsup

p.s. it was still wasted

Roald 03-22-2014 02:27 AM

There are many companies around here who can help you fighting CBs

Paully 03-22-2014 02:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 20023776)
There are many companies around here who can help you fighting CBs

Lots of them:2 cents:. Then you can find someone to help you with billing:2 cents::2 cents::2 cents::2 cents::2 cents::2 cents::2 cents::2 cents::2 cents::2 cents::2 cents:.

seeandsee 03-22-2014 03:02 AM

immposible in my country, it's protected by law, only by curt order

Markul 03-22-2014 05:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seeandsee (Post 20023785)
immposible in my country, it's protected by law, only by curt order

Same here. Should be too with all the nutters out there.

Barry-xlovecam 03-22-2014 06:25 AM

That is called "friendly fraud" if its the case of unauthorized credit card use orbuyer's remorse.

You said it was mainstream. If there were physical goods shipped and received then you have real fraud. If it was a subscription or digitally transmitted goods you are probably shit-out-of-luck.

If you use 3ds (verified by VISA or Mastercard secure) you can transfer the liability for chargebacks to the credit card associations but you will wash out or lose a lot of otherwise legitimate sales.

Because the card issuer is the final arbitrator the process is biased in the card holder's favor and you will eat the loss in most cases.

In all fairness, friendly fraud should not be reflected in your chargeback ratio -- but it is.

http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/70630.html

You are not the only one with the problem.
This most commonly occurs with the banks in the USA.

bean-aid 03-22-2014 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 20023848)
That is called "friendly fraud" if its the case of unauthorized credit card use orbuyer's remorse.

You said it was mainstream. If there were physical goods shipped and received then you have real fraud. If it was a subscription or digitally transmitted goods you are probably shit-out-of-luck.

If you use 3ds (verified by VISA or Mastercard secure) you can transfer the liability for chargebacks to the credit card associations but you will wash out or lose a lot of otherwise legitimate sales.

Because the card issuer is the final arbitrator the process is biased in the card holder's favor and you will eat the loss in most cases.

In all fairness, friendly fraud should not be reflected in your chargeback ratio -- but it is.

http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/70630.html

You are not the only one with the problem.
This most commonly occurs with the banks in the USA.

Spain mastercard. And these 3 are adult. But I have 2 CVV2 matches because the dumb fuck purchased twice in 1 month, with the same IP. The third was rebill after trial so no CVV2 match on that one.

This would fall under friendly fraud. I get chargebacks with everything... just happens. Just in cases like these with iron clad support to suggest the person charging back in fact did make the purchases. If ISP would fork over the customer information for that IP in alleged fraud cases... would go a long way.

I have never been concerned with the amount of chargebacks on any of my MID's... just would like to win all chargeback cases. :thumbsup If someone claims fraud, closes their account, and VISA and Mastercard steal the money from the merchant... I think a little due diligence on the *BANKS* side should be done. Unfortunately, the credit card holder is assumed in the right.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123