Your Thoughts on Shooting Girls Shooting Guns for Porn Sites
 

Do you think scenes with girls holding guns, pointing them at the camera or at other people in the photo are good in general for pay sites? The paysite has nothing to do with guns, weapons or domination. Usually I say no to my photogs shooting this type of content because I don't want to promote violence and I've never really had a site where it seemed relevant. Don't get me wrong I'm all about firearms and freedoms to stay strapped and yeah you might even find me in the woods a few times a year trying to take down the big buck but this issue is more of a concern for my members and fans. What do you think about it?

Nah man, so unchill

no, rednecks are poor

it IS a niche and if you have traffic for it, it will make money....just like any micro-niche

Even G Gordon Liddy worked that niche....remember the stacked and packed calenders

Action Girls did great with that niche

My take would be to shoot a set with water pistols, that look like real guns - ie - not 'Supersoakers' in a multitude of colours....

Have the girls point the guns at other girls, and soak their clothing, make bras and panties show thru and then have them strip and interact...

They could still interact with 'guns' as we have established they are not real...

This covers the gun people, the wetlook niche and teh lesbian niche, and the forced niche...

Divide your product up and you have 4 diff niches to play with...

Or just ignore me, and take pics of them pooing on guns instead... (Protest Niche) :helpme

You won't get 3rd party processing for that type of content :/

Yes sir, I love that site :thumbsup

Chicks with guns intimidate me

Really?
:Oh crap

you go hunting, but are concerned about promoting violence?

I remember a thread like this before when someone complained that they were unable to get 3rd party billing because of the guns.

hot Girl + gun = Hotter Girl

Put only a Jersey on and you get Bonus points!

:2 cents:

i own a facebook page with 50k likes dedicated to girls w/ guns
guys like it but not sure if they would pay for it

Yeah its considered as promoting violence or some stupid bullshit like that, makes absolutely no sense.

Few years back one of my business partners had a photoset in a members area of a chick with a rifle on the floor next to her while she was naked, she wasn't touching it, it wasn't really an integral part of the set (just making it look military) and his processor at the time (CCBill) gave him so much shit about removing that set.

Consider that shooting Gonzo with no plot has no reason for guns and therefore is only
serving the prurient interest of gun violence.

Now if these chicks are going to raid a terrorist camp and capture massive Arab cocks then
we got porn!

:1orglaugh

They had some amazing content! :thumbsup

http://titsassandammo.com/main/image...n_katy/vid.jpg

http://titsassandammo.com/main/image...ncesca/vid.jpg

http://titsassandammo.com/main/images/nancy/vid.jpg

This looks pretty violent to me with guns pointed at people's heads. Maybe Epoch and some of MediaRevenue's other processors will find an excuse to terminate their billing relationship with TrafficCashGold for operating the paysite TitsAssAndAmmo.com

When women fire semi automatics, their boobies bounce. It's beautiful.