Man Arrested for Wearing Peace T-Shirt
 

Good. They should lock all of those damned hippies up.

america is one fucked up place

I wish shit like that would happen to me I would sue the living shit out of that mall, the police etc... god this country is going down the shitter every day and fast :( I've been thinking to move up to where sleazydreams live and become his bitch *shrugs* who knows lol

TOM

Yeh, but they aren't saying the whole story. A group of peace protestors caused all sorts of commotion at this mall. So when they saw this guy they thought it was the protesters coming in to start trouble again and they asked him to leave the property and he refused.

Private property is private property.

Gotta love freedom of speech and it's great implementation.

A 60 year old guy and his son? I don't buy it.

And everywhere else is Perfect then I presume?

We all have our problems. Your statement should be the whole world is a fucked up place. Now that I'll agree with. :1orglaugh

Look the law is the law. When you are on private property and you are asked to step off the property and you refuse you are breaking the law no matter what the reason.

There is nothing to buy. The law is the law.

Cartman was right! They should lock up all those hippies and make them take baths. Damn hippies.

ahaha

Turn it around for a second.

Some guy walks onto your yard and you ask him to leave and he says no, do you have the right to call the police and then he refuses to get off your property even when the police arrive. Sorry but he is subject to arrest at that point.

don't worry read his sig, he's also having a rough time in australia. guy can't catch a break I guess...


"No one dies a virgin...coz society fucks everyone."

exactly, this isnt about "america being a terrible country because it arrests peace loving people" its about some hippies tresspassing. its their mall they can throwout whoever they want. just like in your .htaccess you can block any IP you want :-)

Are you joking with this private property line of thinking.

Does this mean I can open a restaurant and not serve black people because it is private property and I can throw anyone out that I want?!?

:321GFY :boid :321GFY

Man alive, what's to joke? Here it is in black and white.

Shopping Courtesy Code

Loitering, hanging out, sitting on floors, planters, or trash cans, leaning on handrails, blocking hallways, storefronts, fire exits, corridors or escalators or escalators, and congregating or walking in groups in such a way as to inconvenience others or impede traffic flow is not permitted.

Yelling, singing, or playing musical instruments, radios and tape players is not allowed. Loud music or noise from any source, including car sound systems, is not permitted.

Appropriate attire is required (shirt, pants and shoes) and profane, offensive or antagonistic slogans or graphics will not be permitted. Offensive attire includes lewd or extreme dress or anything which may offend the sensitivities of others.

Physically or verbally threrating any person, fighting, annoying others through noisy or boisterous activities, staring at or stalking a person through the mall is not permitted.

Alcoholic beverages are not permitted to leave the restaurant area once purchased.

Littering or damaging mall property with graffiti is prohibited.

Patrons are expected to use the trash cans to dispose of litter.

Using profane or sexually offensive language or conduct or in any way creating a disturbance which interferes, disrupts, or endangers mall patrons is not permitted.

Food court tables are reserved for diners only.

Animals, other than those used for the physically challenged, are not allowed.

The use of skates, skateboards, roller blades, bicycles, or similar equipment is prohibited.

Throwing of objects or spitting on the floors or over the rails is not allowed.

Guns or weapons are not allowed on the property, conceded or otherwise, (except by authorized Police Agencies).

Solicitation or the sale of goods without permission of the mall management is strictly prohibited.

At closing time, patrons are asked to leave the mall property.

Children under the age of 18 must be accompanied by a responsible adult during school hours.

All motor vehicles must observe posted speed limits.

Unauthorized vehicles left unattended in fire lanes, handicap spaces or other restricted areas, can be ticketed and towed at owners expense. The posting of handbills any where on mall property is not allowed.

Use of cameras and video equipment within the shopping center must receive prior approval by mall management.

The interior of shopping center is a smoke free environment.

Failure to obey these rules or to comply with the lawful and reasonable requests by the Mall Management or Public Safety, will result in your being asked to leave the mall. If you refuse to leave, you can be arrested and prosecuted for criminal trespassing.

What is your point these guys were not violating any of these?!?

How do you know?

Did you even bother to read the artiicle?

AND THE SHIRTS WERE MADE IN THE MALL! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Use your head, if you can. News articles always leave facts out because their objective is to draw controversy and attention.

For one it's private property. If they tell you to leave, you are required to LEAVE or get arrested. Comprende? Look on the bottom of the article:

"Monday's arrest came less than three months after about 20 peace activists wearing similar T-shirts were told to leave by mall security and police. There were no arrests."

"NO ARRESTS". Because they LEFT and they know the law enough to not cause a fuss or get arrested. The guy in the article obviously tried to bitch back or refused to leave and therefore got busted.

Before you respond that it shouldn't matter, take this example: You are allowed to "loiter" (stand around) freely around a "public" beach or park but you're limited to do the same exact act in private property.

good and i think they should arrest you to for posting this

Appropriate attire is required (shirt, pants and shoes) and profane, offensive or antagonistic slogans or graphics will not be permitted. Offensive attire includes lewd or extreme dress or anything which may offend the sensitivities of others.

Keywords being antagonistic slogans and anything which may offend the sensitivities of others.

Comprende?

Now people are offended by a peace sign? Please, the motivation was obvious. They hate peace lovers. They used the fucked up law to their advantage. Damn republicans and their "personal rights". The only reason they have them is so they can have the right to shit on whoever they like.

On a second note I'd like to throw people out of the mall for wearing jesus tee-shirts. The bible is very offensive in the fact that it declares homosexuality a sin, and that it insinuates that if we don't follow christ we're going to hell.

I'd also like to ban people wearing American flags from my mall. Why? I don't like them. Just applying the same rule that they did for the peace sign.

See my point?:2 cents:

So he cannot wear a T-shirt that he bought in that very same mall?!? Am I the only one who sees this as ludicrous.

wish i ran a mall so i could kick out all blacks and fat women...joking but you get my point

No, I don't see your point. Of course you can ban anybody you want to, but it's your business and reputation that's going to go under.

That was my point. It's going to go under cause they're corporate scumbags and stupid security guards. So fuck em :321GFY

Yes you are.
once you own something, you'll realize how important it is to protect it.
once you graduate from highschool, you'll hopefully have a better reading comprehension level and read the entire article and understand what was going on.

Does that mean if I have an apartment building as my business. That I can deny housing to Black, Gays, Jews or ranyone else. I think we settled that issue a long time ago in the Supreme Court.

Is this just the standard idiot reply. For your information I am 35 years old I have a very large house, a wife, a son, and one on the way. If you had even a modicum of intelligence you would make a point that has bearing on this thread.

as this has nothing to do with the article, I'm guessing you're grasping at straws to protect your point.

I made a point, your highschool intelligence just didn't see it (no matter what age you are)

you're 35 and thing like this? good luck in life.:1orglaugh

Protect it from what? Peace lovers? It's obviously an abuse of their right to kick anyone out of the mall. Unfortunately that's the way the system's been built. Gotta suck it then I guess.

The guy with the shirt will win in court. The shirt was not offensive -- any judge can see that. The fact that the son co-operated by removing his shirt -- evading arrest -- shows that it was only the shirt in question, not any mis-conduct! This father and son team had it all planned from the beginning... they will win in court because it was proven by the son's removing of his shirt that this arrest was only due to the shirt. The mall will not be able to prove that the shirt is offensive. Case closed.

I always enjoy people who are not smart enough to know that they are stupid. The only arguments you have made during a debate over free speech is to make personal attacks on me. This is not a sign of intelligence rather a sign of ignorance and intolerance. I guess you have been pulling fingers your whole life.

HAHAHAHA Fuck nut this isn't even a law, you copied this text off a redneck Mississippi Mall Website!

http://www.bonitalakesmall.com/mall/...urity?openform :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

1210 Bonita Lakes Circle
Meridian, Mississippi 39301

Here's their other website: http://www.turtlecreekmall.com/mall/...urity?openform

If your wife does too you'll have a happy marriage at least.:1orglaugh

you're not bright enough to know that this isn't a free speach issue. (to the under educated, I'm sure it seems this way)

I don't debate dopes, I ridicule them.

The issue is private property. the issue is people dressed exactly the same way disrupting business in the past. Now you can pretend its about free speech and pretend its about discrimination but all you'd do is be pretending. :thumbsup

I guess then when you finally get your G.E.D. you can start a finger pulling company.

We don't really know for sure if anyone was disrupting business, or if the guy with the shirt was even a part of the previous allegations of a disruption... Where's the proof? How many of these shirts were sold? For all you know this father/son team bought the shirts somewhere else... Unless the Mall has some photo documentation of the same guy wearing the same shirt causing a disruption -- these are just retarded allegations.

Just the fact that the mall sold the shirts is just the icing on the cake -- if you buy a shirt in the mall, you should be allowed to wear it in the mall that sold it to you. Obviously the mall approved of the shirt to sell it in the first place -- now they can't go out and arrest people for wearing what they sold!

Bottom line is the guy was arrested for wearing a shirt the mall sold him.
:1orglaugh

12Clicks I definetly see your point and though I don't agree with your philosophy I have to admit you're right except for one thing. This is definetly discrimination, just not one that's punishable by law. You can say that it's because protesters wore peace sign tee-shirts in the past, but the fact is that the peace sign is one of the most familiar symbols in our society. I'm sure the shirt had been worn many times before that and will be worn many times after.

And :BangBang: at those protesters for not getting a permit. They made everyone hate peace signs. I'm a peace advocate myself but that was a retarded move.

Permit to wear a shirt? Why don't we just stamp your forehead with 666.

No, you need a permit to assemble in a public place. If you don't get one you're just asking for trouble. At least for an anti-war protest. If this was anti-globalization I'd say fuck permits and smash the fucking system. Different issue though.

Upon entering the mall there should be a list of "approved" shirts that you can wear.

We should fly there and sell "Boneprone Approved" shirts with peace signs -- see if we can get arrested!

I bet half of us could wear GFY shirts and they won't be considered offensive or disruptive, but the ones wearing the BP peace sign shirts will get assaulted :1orglaugh

``We don't care what they have on their shirts, but they were asked to leave the property, and it's private property,'' Murley said.

Private property, owner's rules.

You also don't know if he WASN'T causing controversy. But what you do know from the article is that 20 people just 3 months prior were involved in the same incident with security mall. TWENTY people were protesting but when asked to leave, they left, so NOBODY got arrested. You still with me here? He didn't get arrested because he "was wearing a SHIRT" OBVIOUSLY. The wearing of the shirt led up to what ultimately caused him to get arrested, which was his refusal to leave. He got arrested because he refused to obey an order by security personel to leave the premises, which is private property.

That doesn't mean the owners aren't douchebags.

True they have every right to make him leave("legal" right that is), but it's still retarded that this type of thing could go on.