UK Riots Again?..
 

They just ruled that the killing of Duggan - The guy that sparked the last riots was legal - Lets hope it's too cold for all the fucking idiots to go out on a rampage again...

Darks shitting in foreign country again?

The cunt had a gun. Police took him down before he took someone else down.

Fuck him! And fuck anyone that tries to use it as an excuse to go on the rampage again...

police make shit up all the time. http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2...h-london-riots would be funny as hell if someone came forward with footage of police doing wrong :2 cents:

I have zero respect for people who protest. People who riot are basically saying "I want instant response to my cause or problem or issue without putting in the time and effort to go through the proper channels".

You have the right to be heard; You do not have the right to destroy someone else's property and or tie up dozens if not hundreds of police officers.

OWS - what did that accomplish other than burning through our tax dollars and leaving behind a trail of lawsuits?

Funny they should call anyone murderers. I wonder what exactly Mark Duggan intended to do with the gun he collected minutes before.

The full family just come across as being scumbags...




http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/...04_306x475.jpg

Bang bang!

These comments sum it up:

.
.

and the usual crap from his family "he was an angel and a credit to the community!" Right! what sort of community has drug dealing scum with a gun as a "credit" to the community?

I would just love a news reporter to ask them that exact question when they are giving an interview. Which they no doubt will be over the next days, weeks, months... :disgust

brown? :2 cents:

Protest /= riot.

But
 

Seems like a waste of Police resources going after a small time crook.

The Cops fucked up over-reacted and shot an unarmed man in haste than tried to cover it up.


See the LEGAL INQUEST Info / Evidence below BEFORE you RUSH to Judgement.

Two officers testified he had a weapon. The forensic evidence did not support that, and other expert evidence suggested key parts of the police account were incorrect.

The jury decided Duggan threw the gun before police confronted him, and did not have it in his hand when shot.

Despite the verdict of lawful killing, a series of decisions by the Metropolitan police and the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), which investigates police shootings, damaged public confidence.

One informed Met source said: "It was death by a thousand fuckups."

The operation that culminated in Duggan being shot, Operation Dibri, was run by the Met's Trident unit, which investigates gun crime in London's black community. It relied on intelligence from the now-defunct Serious and Organised Crime Agency (Soca) about his alleged activities. Part of it was based on the bugging of Duggan's phone.

Aged 29, Duggan had just two relatively minor criminal convictions, one for possession of cannabis and one for handling stolen goods.

Source...the Legal Inquest as reported by the Guardian.

but guns are highly unusual in British society, anyone with a gun in public is no-longer a small time crook and instantly becomes a number one target to take off the streets - and rightly so. He was stupid enough to have a gun and I have no pity for him whatsoever.

i am looking to get a plasma tv.

Cops play with guns and they also do their best to intimidate the public here in the states now.

They are all dressed for combat. Fuck all cops!

I'm so surprised! Fuck *evidence*, especially if he was brown, eh?

"The jury said they were sure, by the same eight-to-two
majority, that Duggan did not have a weapon in his hands when police
surrounded him. By a majority, the jury concluded he "threw" the gun
from a cab he was travelling in when armed officers forced it to stop."

If only he was white, eh?

oh, the troll is awake. look at little Daimo trying to boost his little pecker by bringing race into it.

Hi, race and country traitor :upsidedow

Race was one part of my post. the fact, unarguable fact, he didn't have a gun and wasn't posing an immediate threat is the important part.

but I totally get why you ignored that part of my post.

it's hard to argue against fact, isn't it kiddo?

so do explain, why do you think it's cool to kill an unarmed man, aside from the fact he wasn't white?

Yeah, I am such a cunt for suggesting it's wrong to shoot an unarmed man.

DAMN ME AND MY LEFTY WAYS!

SHOOT ALL THE WOGS!

The Police shot an unarmed man.

If this had happened in Russia or China how would the Daily Mail and the other gutter press have reported it?

Terror State? KGB murder? Communist oppression?

It is sad that the fans of the Daily Mail here seem to have no capacity for independent thought just regurgitate the lightly disguised racism printed every day in that semi fascist rag.

As our un elected government cuts support for the poorest, concentrates wealth into fewer and fewer hands there is more and more reason to riot.

Fixed your very important typo. The people complaining about people being annoyed that an unarmed man was shot dead have to be racists/cunts. I can't think of a SINGLE logical reason why a rational human being would rejoice at an unarmed man being shot dead except for that.

But I wait with interest for the people in this thread applauding the po-po for killing an unarmed mad to justify it.

so is food that is not 90% grease. funny how the racist pour into these threads

http://www.ncc-1776.org/tle2010/tle558-20100221-07.html

not that you're going to read this.. or.. anything

Which is it:

But you are arguing against facts - he did have a gun, little Daimo. And stop trying to bring race into it, this has nothing to do with the fact that Duggen was a small-time drug dealer with a gun out on the streets. The only reason why you've brought race into the argument is to try and shout people down by using the very overused "racist" card, sorry but its been heard and used so many times before by you Dianne Abbot worshipers that it doesn't work anymore when the facts are staring you in the face. He did have a gun. Just because he was black doesn't change that fact - nothing racist about that.

Dianne Abbot is my MP - Vile woman and one of the worst racists I have had the misfortune of meeting...

As far as the Duggan shooting goes I wasn't there and I didn't hear the evidence that the jurors heard - However, I do know he was a drug dealer, he did have a gun and if you live by the sword etc.....

I've met a few people who have had the misfortune of working with her and they all say that too. They all said that she was very open with her racism. - she is one of the (many) reasons why I'll never again in my lifetime vote Labour, why they haven't thrown her out is totally beyond me, the Labour bigwigs MUST know about her views.

She is totally open about it - She left me speechless on more than occasion with some of the stuff she came out with - That doesn't happen often - lol...

I don't believe they shot him because of his colour.

A white guy in that same situation would surely have been shot as well.

But...he didn't. The jury voted 8:2 that he was unarmed?

Pick any source you prefer

https://www.google.co.uk/search?clie...f9OMGWhQf804Bg

The "being unarmed" situation?

..........

Indeed.

By the way how come all those "innocent child" (Saint Skittles) or "unarmed man" (this person) turns out to be criminal elements/thugs/gangsters.
Somehow it does not happen to regular folk that often, yet apologists still sing their "unarmed", "innocent" prays.

okay, how about the BBC? (lets see you try and claim that it's too right wing to have any "facts" that you and only you deem permissible, little Daimo)

Just ignore the stupid cunt

Duggan was a cunt, the old bill were bigger cunts. just because the old bill shot an unarmed man, doesn't mean duggan wasn't a cunt. And just because duggan was a cunt, he didn't deserve to be shot. Yep, Duggan was a scummy dealer, but is anyone really so blinkered as to believe the UK armed police aren't pumped up gung-ho macho men who think they are above the law? duggan wasn't above it, and did deserve to be dealt with - but lethal force by a load of testosterone fuelled Billy Big Bollocks' wasn't right, and wasn't lawful, no matter what a bunch of dumb fuck jurors may have said.

Cunt <--- didn't use that at all after the first sentence, so just throwing it in for good measure

Exactly.

So, he was unarmed for all of 5 seconds. Whoop dee doo !!

Give the guy a nobel peace prize...

It was no surprise she had things to say about the case anyway.

(yes it's a DailyMail link calm down)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ly-killed.html

This is a public service announcement
With guitar
Know your rights all 3 of them
I say
Number 1: You have the right not to be killed
Murder is a CRIME!
Unless it was done by a
Policeman or aristocrat
Number 2: You have the right to food money
Providing of course you
Don't mind a little
Humiliation, investigation
And if you cross your fingers
Rehabilitation
Wang! Young offenders! Know your rights
Number 3: You have the right to freeeee
Speech as long as you're not
Dumb enough to actually try it.
Know your rights
These are your rights
All 3 of 'em
It has been suggested
In some quarters that this is not enough!
Well..............................
Get off the streets
Get off the streets
Run
You don't have a home to go to
Smush
Finally then I will readd you your rights
You have the right to remain silent
You are warned that anything you say
Can and will be taken down
And used as evidence against you
Listen to this
Run

Yeah, but stupid people forget that. They think its a rare thing, but we all know there are alot of very bad/poor police officers

Oh man.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

You wouldn't believe how hard I laughed at that one. Shit. Now I feel like a dick.

Diana Abbot a racist and UKIP and the Daily Mail are the agents for racial harmony.

What a mad world you inhabit. Is it the only way you can live with your hatred for strangers?

The facts are that the police shot a man who had no gun.

The police then fed the press with disinformation about his character.

They lied about the situation just like they lied about plebgate.

Yes, the victim was a petty criminal, not a rare thing in the poorest area in UK

The fact that is is being planed to fitted the police with video is an admission to the problem.

Just like they had to record interviews to stop confessions being beaten out of people.

Do you want to live in a country where the police can murder people in the street?

To the police pornographers are not much different from petty criminals.

Diane Abbot, UKIP and The Daily Mail are all racist - You do understand that racism goes both ways?..

I still can't hear 'PLEBGATE' without laughing - An MP had a bad day and called a policeman a 'pleb' - It has become "PLEBGATE" and it has cost the tax payer 100s of thousands - Numerous people have lost their jobs - If it wasn't so fucking ridiculous it would funny...

Tell me, what do you think this "petty criminal" intended to do with a gun ??

I'd really like to know...

Defend himself against police who shoot on sight?

The bad thing about being dead is that you are not able to answer the question.

So why would he throw it away then when they approach him ?

Or could you just not think of another way to defend him ??

Last riots were August. Won't happen at the moment - too cold now for scum.