GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Wordpress SEO vs HTML5 Tube SEO (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1128131)

digitaldivas 12-08-2013 08:04 AM
Wordpress SEO vs HTML5 Tube SEO
 
I was checking stats and most wordpress tubes rank much lower, SEO wise, than a site that happens to have a tube format, but was authored in HTML5.

Also, is it true that the more tube content you put on a wordpress site, the more bogged down it gets, as far as fetching the pages where the video will be playing?

just a punk 12-08-2013 08:20 AM
Sorry for a stupid question, but what is a problem to make a HTML5 tube on WordPress?

Antonio 12-08-2013 08:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitaldivas (Post 19900737)
I was checking stats and most wordpress tubes rank much lower, SEO wise, than a site that happens to have a tube format, but was authored in HTML5.

Also, is it true that the more tube content you put on a wordpress site, the more bogged down it gets, as far as fetching the pages where the video will be playing?
Hmm, Google eats Wordpress sites like there's no tomorrow and you shouldn't have issues with "fetching the pages" either. On a decent virtual host, you should be able to host a site with a few hundred thousand posts easily, once your site grows, simply move it to a VPS or dedicated.

digitaldivas 12-08-2013 08:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 19900747)
Sorry for a stupid question, but what is a problem to make a HTML5 tube on WordPress?
Might not be a problem, i just don't know how to do it yet, if it is possible.

digitaldivas 12-08-2013 08:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Antonio (Post 19900758)
Hmm, Google eats Wordpress sites like there's no tomorrow and you shouldn't have issues with "fetching the pages" either. On a decent virtual host, you should be able to host a site with a few hundred thousand posts easily, once your site grows, simply move it to a VPS or dedicated.
thanks antonio, that was what i was thinking intiially. i was having a convo with another webmaster the other night and he had said that he was having issues with fetch time for the posts after 4k pages on his WP site. this was after he had installed various WP caching plugins

digitaldivas 12-08-2013 08:55 AM
ok, so this is the custom tube I have been working on. It just seems to load a crapload faster than my current wordpress. it is also alot prettier, imho.

http://tube-erotique.com/new/sheer-nylons-smoking.html

what do you guys think?

just a punk 12-08-2013 08:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitaldivas (Post 19900769)
Might not be a problem, i just don't know how to do it yet, if it is possible.
Course it is possible. Just use the HTML5-compatible player and make sure all your videos are in mp4 format (flv's won't work on iOS and latest versions of Android because flash is not supported there).

digitaldivas 12-08-2013 08:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CyberSEO (Post 19900786)
Course it is possible. Just use the HTML5-compatible player and make sure all your videos are in mp4 format (flv's won't work on iOS and latest versions of Android because flash is not supported there).
oh yes, i got that CyberSEO. thanks. I thought you meant droppable html5 pages, with a "wordpress type" engine.

PornDiscounts-V 12-08-2013 09:51 AM
The non wordpress tubes dominate not because they aren't using wordpress, but because of why they aren't using wordpress.

Now think about the why.

Barry-xlovecam 12-08-2013 09:52 AM
What are the page headers?
Code:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
   
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
Many people are serving with the same MIME type as HTML4. That may be why.


Quote:
Content-Type: text/ html text/ html is called the ?content type? or ?MIME type? of the page. This header is the only thing that determines what a particular resource truly is, and therefore how it should be rendered. Images have their own MIME types (image/ jpeg for JPEG images, image/ png for PNG images, and so on). JavaScript files have their own MIME type. CSS stylesheets have their own MIME type. Everything has its own MIME type. The Web runs on MIME types.


This specification later became known as ?XHTML 1.0?. It defined a new MIME type for XHTML documents, application/ xhtml + xml. However, to ease the migration of existing HTML 4 pages,

Starting with Version 1.1, all XHTML documents were to be served with a MIME type of application/ xhtml + xml.

Pilgrim, Mark (2010-08-06). HTML5: Up and Running O'Reilly Media. Kindle Edition.

digitaldivas 12-08-2013 10:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 19900825)
What are the page headers?
Code:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
   
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
Many people are serving with the same MIME type as HTML4. That may be why.
That is actually a fucking valid point, did not even think to look there.

digitaldivas 12-08-2013 10:13 AM
like this example of this custom tube that I am working on
http://www.tube-erotique.com/new/bea...odel-feet.html

the top html is much more web 2.0 friendly


<!DOCTYPE html>
<html class="html">
<head>

<meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8"/>

this, causing more SEO relevancy, unless i am completely mistaken on this point...

what do you guys think?

digitaldivas 12-08-2013 10:18 AM
...nevermind Barry, you answered it, thanks man

Stephen 12-08-2013 11:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by digitaldivas (Post 19900844)

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html class="html">
<head>

<meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8"/>

this, causing more SEO relevancy, unless i am completely mistaken on this point...

what do you guys think?
drop the class="html" and include the base language specification instead

also, in HTML5 you do not escape tag ends: > NOT />


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123