Female Condoms?
 

Has anyone here tried Female Condoms?

Female Condoms In The News

Is that when the biatch pays for the jimmy-hat? Then hell yeah! I ALWAYS make 'em pay!

I like the idea but can this condom be placed on their mouth permanatly?

there are lots of women out there who don't mind investing in something with a 20% faliure rate, daddy.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

You don't know HOW on the mark you are. I AM the product of a defective condom. Sixties birth control SUCKED. Ask Mom!

Oh, HELL no! I don't party with "female cock"!

What I want to know is why don't they ever show pictures of the female condom... :1orglaugh

Brad

I used to do peer to peer safe sex education work in uni and it included the female condom. Let me tell you just about no one knows how to use them correctly. We had some real horrid things that people did because no one told them how to use them.

One that sticks in the mind was when the woman in the couple used the female condom and the man wore his own condom and they didn't think to use lube. Well boys and girls..what happens when you get a lot of friction on latex?

I think it is great that there is a product for women to take things into their own hands (so to speak) but there is little to no education available to them on how to use it and most men wouldn't even recognize one.

Oh, and little known fact..the instructions on them say they can be used in male/male anal sex ..or atleast they used to.

http://www.femalehealth.com/theproduct.html

has a pic on it.

Thanks for the pics. OK, I'll stick to Trojans. That looks totally unreliable.

not unreliable as long as you know how to use them but most don't. Also, think of the trouble people have getting male condoms on when they are drunk. Imagine the fun with those.

Yeh, I meant the people using them would make them unreliable. Plus that procedure to insert them would kill the romance of the moment.

similar to putting in a diaphram but yeah I largely agree.

"The new studies found the female condom provided less protection in three types of couples -- those who had been together less than two years, those who engaged in "very active" intercourse, and those who had a "large disparity" between the size of the penis and the size of the vagina."

What would being together less than two years have to do with it's effectiveness?

What the hell are you talking about?

sweet tranny luv

Maybe the "thrill" hasn't worn off yet at that point, so you're having "very active" intercourse a lot more frequently?!?

That's the only thing I can think of...
The page with the picture on it says it's annual accidental pregnancy rate is 5%, a male condom is 3%. Not too bad!

i'm guessing that two years is just their way of saying a long term couple..most likely without additional partners. So, they studied couples who weren't long term and they also did long term couples. Perhaps by effectiveness they are including the chances of becoming 'lazy' and not using it. In which case, more women would get pregnant or an STD and would show up on their chart as not having used it correctly.