this is some hsyterical shit right here...
 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...parations.html :winkwink:

That's just stupid.

they should sue africa, because their fellow africans sold their forefathers to these other countries. Everyone seems to forget this fact when it comes to slavery though.

:2 cents::2 cents::thumbsup

I know, white people weren't sneaking thru the jungle looking for Africans to kidnap. They purchased slaves from their fellow Africans.

Bingo.



As a matter of fact, there are STILL several countries in Africa where slavery is tolerated, and it's still widespread. In Mauritania, it was only made illegal in 2007!




.

mostly from arabs... weird isn't it? the guys that started the 'slave trade' are revered and the guys that ended the 'slave trade' are despised.... kinda makes a guy wonder, doesn't?

Im a little confused, are they suing for getting free labor?

I have a feeling someone is just trying to make their wallets a little heavier than "Repairing" anything.

doesn't matter how much 'money' is dumped into those areas.... never accomplish anything. there is NO 'general societal trust' :2 cents:

at least we can drop the civilized facade :)

here ya go fuckwad: This message is hidden because _Richard_ is on your ignore list.

dutch guy talking about slavery issues, very interesting :)

I'd love to see the descendents of American and European seamen to sue the African Barbary Coast nations for selling their ancestors into slavery.

Will probably never happen, but it seems an oft overlooked fact.

even fucking germany never paid my grandmother for working in their labor camps in WW2, mother fucking NAZI!!!!!!!!!

If Jews can get money for Holocaust why not these guys?

they have every right to sue these despicable maggots

its too bad no amount of money will bring justice

they do pay/ were paying, but its peanuts

for Jews the Holocaust is the main argument which permits them to make Holocaust (well, almost) for Palestinians

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh
So true!

The Dutch were the ones who were THE slave traders.

Sure, but the first law of litigation is go after the deep pockets. Even if they win a lawsuit with the entire continent of Africa, what could they possibly be awarded? Some stick huts that look like a cub scout built a campfire and forgot to light it? Some disease-carrying mosquitoes? I mean, honestly, some bottles of Saharan sand? The entire combined wealth of Africa is what, $60?

you think it's hysterical why exactly?

Some of the same corporations are running today that have billions of dollars in reserves and that money was directly accrued from slave labor gains.

Same as some of the Japanese companies that used American GI's as slave labor...worked them till they literally dropped dead - do you also think that is hysterical?

:1orglaugh

so the army needs to sue Japan? ..... FYI: general motors and firestone and a petroleum companies bough out the LT rail lines (trollies) in LA... and torn them the fuck out and sold the right-aways... YOU KNOW WHY??????

so they could sell fucking buses to the city... and guess what? still have fucking buses... SO a bunch or guys... well like you.... decided to sue.. . GM/FS/76 or who ever and you know what? they won.... one fucking dollar because the principles were DEAD...

now who in the fuck ALIVE today is responsible for slavery? ... waiting.... waiting.... waiting ... OH YEAH!!! No FUCKING BODY!!!! how the fuck about that????

send a dollar to Jamaica and move the fuck on sweetie :winkwink:

before or after the europeans, chinese, and north americans are done with them?

Point made. :winkwink: