Syria terorrists and killers
 

Last time when I've pasted photos of killed people by Muslim Albanian terrorists decapitating people in Kosovo, someone told me it is forbidden . Is it allowed to paste one shocking video of "freedom fighters" fighting against "tyrant" Asad?

children are fighting in the syrian rebellion like children fought for the viet-cong in vietnam, i have already seen in it in one of your so-called shocking movies i don't want to see it again.

what is a country like china doing gearing up for what will be world war four with now aircraft carriers when terrorism from any sizeable force can hurt them as it has almost destroyed the united states.

No, fuck off.

You cannot post those .

But you can post the same pics and/or videos if you say that the Assad Regime did it !

and yet you can only readily find proof of said atrocities from one side

You can post photos of 'Rebel' atrocities as long as you Photoshop Assad to give the impression he was the perpetrator, in fact there's big money available if you want to do that for a living. :upsidedow

I don't care about opinions.just asking for forum rules.

I'm sorry, who has "almost destroyed the United States"?

Last time I checked, we were attacked once, and since then we've removed one government, replaced another, and we bomb our enemies at will and seems to be nothing they can do to stop us.

The general public fails to understand the change that has taken place with our military. Vietnam is a distant memory. Now the US military over runs and then removes and replaces entire governments in weeks. What the fuck is this nonsense "almost destroy the United States". They attacked civilians in a single attack and have been on the run and in hiding since them.

I don't think any place on the net other than youtube and gore sites are going to let you post that shit, you should already no that.

I would imagine if Youtube allows it, it should be allowed here.

I've seen many people have their threads with violent youtube videos deleted. Believe it or not porn and death don't mix well.

I think i've already seen enough to be honest...

Number 9 of forum rule :Posting images of death, dismemberment, or animal cruelty will not be permitted and will be removed. Violation will result in a banning. We don't want to see that shit here!

does that means directly on site, but links with warning can be posted?

You can post a link, I don't think that was ever the issue. I think the issue was opening up a thread and seeing the image.

you have actually destroyed yourselves.

bush a conservative, what a joke.

tell me why in lybia everyone didn't see a guerilla war between another rebellion and khaddaffis forces there?

you have just destroyed yourselves, i shouldn't need to explain. because of that, china is now i think the worlds top superpower and they have the opportunity to lead this world, it was just handed to them by another superpower with a broken system of government.

there are no muslim freedom fighters, only muslim jihadists trying to gain new territories/kill christians/burn churches/kill buddists/destroy ancient buddas/destroy ancient graves in Sudan etc etc etc

i can tell you for a fact that every single person i've asked irl no one gives a shit about being leader of the free world.

in fact it's a dead term

The "Leader of the Free World" is a colloquialism, first used during the Cold War, to describe either the United States or the President of the United States. The term, when used in this context, suggests that the United States is the principal democratic superpower, and the U.S. President is, by extension, the leader of the world's democratic states, i.e. the "Free World". The phrase had its origin in the late 1940s, and has become more widely used since the early 1950s.

It was heavily referenced in American foreign policy up until the dissolution of the Soviet Union in December 1991,

and has since fallen out of use, in part due to its usage in anti-American rhetoric.

stop getting my country involved in your wars we had a clean fatality record up until recently when our soldiers starting getting blasted off all of a sudden in afghanistan.

i think it was true, the united states being leader of the free world, maybe in the fifties was when it was especially true.

i've got news for you, down here nowadays it is about the rise of china and the fall of the united states. does the fall of the united states mean something to you, it means they were, certainly statistically in some aspects, the superpower of this world but that has all changed because of your broken system of government.

how do your politicians sleep at night and how do they honour the word of american law, the flag and the american people with a clear conscience?

you don't have any news for me, you are not saying anything i haven't read on message board by others with anti-american sentiment like you. i couldn't give a shit about what you think is the "fall of the usa" or wtfever.

anyone would be hardpressed to point to ANY government that is not broken right now, so you're picking usa out of the mix and shining a light on it is neither here nor there. whoopie. your country sucks too, and i don't even know what country it is but i could find plenty of suck about it in about 45 seconds via goog.

and i couldn't care less about worrying how politicians sleep at night. they don't represent my views and haven't for a long time.

Ok then: http://en.alalam.ir/news/1509683