Who's hotter? Playboy Playmates from 70s/80s or today's pornstars? *PIX INSIDE*
 

Robbie contends that today's crop of hardcore pornstars are as hot/beautiful as the Playboy Playmates from our youth, i think me and Robbie are close in age. So I took a random year, 1970, and here are the 12 Playmates from 1970. We all know who the big pornstars are today - please try to be unbiased when it comes to things like bush, hair styles, makeup and of course you having seen the current pornstars being railed by huge dicks and swallowing loads of cum. Judge them on their beauty and bodies.

PLAYBOY PLAYMATES OF 1970

70's/80's :thumbsup

It's the tan lines and (mostly) real breast that do it for me. Drool!

some of them are fucking hot! not like the whores nowadays :2 cents: cant compare making something with love and fun, and getting hard fucked ass for money just because the whore is lazy to work :2 cents: nice share! :thumbsup

Mutt, you're all backwards. I never "contended" that "todays pornstars" were hotter. I said that I can walk into any club here in Vegas and find hotter girls than Playboy had.

And further...you were talking about "natural" this and "natural" that and how girls today have fake boobs.

I'd like to remind you that Hefner personally paid for his centerfolds to get boob jobs. It was a prerequisite if you recall.

P.S.: Yeah, these girls are all pretty...but definitely not as smoking hot as you were waxing nostalgic about earlier bro. I think we all remember things a little better than they really were and those pics kinda prove it.

He wasn't getting boob jobs for girls in 1970.

As far as girls in clubs vs playmates/pornstars - well no shit, 99.99% of beautiful girls in 1970 or today wanted/want nothing to do with nude modeling so I agree with that point.

not really - before i googled to find these pics these are the type of girls i remember. pretty girls with no tattoos of course, well proportioned bodies and natural fairly big breasts. there were 'average' Playmates and then some who stood out.

http://blog.celebritymovieblog.com/w...ieBenton04.JPG

Barbi Benton's puffies... :jerkoff

:stoned

ADG

http://pleasurephoto.files.wordpress...on-clark-a.jpg

another cute picture of sharon clark

the hair and hair color are terrible but i can just imagine her with todays hair stylists. beauty

I believe the modern pornstar needs much more makeup to reach the level of attractiveness

They were hot :thumbsup

Cant be those old style titties.

The tanlines, natural boobs (some great nipples too) some bush. Playboy had a great formula a formula that reminded guys of a time.

fuck, this girl reminds me of somebody and for the life of me i can't think of who - a celebrity or a more recent model.

want her - how old would she be - say she's 20 there - 1970 - she's 63 now.

yikes - she was 27 born in 1943 - she's 70 :Oh crap

wow, nice girls!

Those babes can get it!

They look very hot to me. They look natural,real and approachable Hef did good back in the day.

Meh Pussy is pussy as long as your not gagging at her face

As an old gentleman that remembers the 1970s I will have to say that there was more than just the physical beauty of the ladies.

From the point of view of a photographer/pornographer.

We had people that were skilled in the art of photography, lighting and make up. Companies like playboy and penthouse had a process of creating a quality product. Each photo shoot had it's own recipe and each lady had her own individuality. (Not forgetting that we had access to money to create a product that most videos and photos created today will never come close to earning. ) Things like skills, a vision, money and commitment enhance a woman's natural beauty and went a very long way to creating a quality product.

But sadly today that's all gone. What we create is made with the same mentality like McDonalds makes their burgers. Unfortunately the consumer has been conditioned to treat the product and see the lovely ladies in our videos with about as much respect as they do McDonalds food. Therefore from a pragmatic point of view, the old days are gone and they're not coming back any time soon.

From the point of view of a man.

From a physical perspective women today and the women of yesterday still come in all shapes and sizes. So what is physically beautiful still depends on the woman you're looking at.

BUT the women of the 60s/70s/80s had something that is truly lacking today and that's a touch of class. When you consider that the desire for sex starts in the mind then you understand that the non physical traits can make a "Plain-Jane" looking girl appear to be a knock out bombshell. Things like a sense of self, a playful attitude, a welcoming personality and gentleness can do things like turn some lady's crooked smile into the mouth that every man wants to kiss.

Also don't kid yourselves because those non-physical traits were that little indefinable something that everyone unconsciously saw in the photo/film and they're what pushed our sales over the top.

I guess anyone that remembers the old days has a certain nostalgia and sadness. (myself included) But the current situation is the current situation and perhaps one day it will change. Unfortunately I won't be around to see it.

I thought the girls were warmer and more approachable feeling in the photos in the 70's. More normal girls versus classy. I think in the 80's that all changed at Playboy. The women were groomed to be big breasted blond bombshells. Just my opinion as a long term fan of the magazine.

I am used to how girls look today so that attracts me. The % of body fat seems much lower for a girl to be considered beautiful. We have everyone being super thin or a bit cut and it makes a girl look hard by the time she hits her 30's. It also really takes it out of the natural big breasts. You can't have it all...

Yeah Playboy had some amazing girls.

I like the fact that the girls look different. With many of the modern girls, it can be difficult to differentiate one from another (I think a lot of it has to do with the heavy make-up style). Maybe it's a sign of the times, but the earlier Playboy photographers captured an innocence and perhaps a realness, which I feel is lacking in today's version. That was the allure of Playboy, was almost like the girls were innocent but with the right "coaxing" they did the shoot, vs today, that kinda screams "I'm just an attention whore"

My vote goes to the 70/80s girls.

You had to wait a month then buy a magazine if you were an average person. That woman is far more valued, anticipated, appreciated and so on.

I was born in 83. Every picture above reminds me of a girl I see walking outside everyday.

Wasn't that part of the idea? Regular, beautiful girls that you see daily and fantasize about.

I have to admit that I did not read any of the text in this thread :)

But I did enjoy the pics! hehe

what exactly are you comparing those to anyway? There is high end and classy still going around today as well. It's not all throat gags and anal gapes.

After many years of photographing women fucking, sucking, gaping, etc., in glorious living color, my personal work consists mostly of black and white arty-farty nudes shot on film. For me there's no contest--the photography and women were of higher quality in the good old day.

Gracie Glam:

http://www.littlegrayguy.com/gfy/nudes_02.jpg

Women do NOT look like they did 30 years ago. LOL

Older !!!

I like the girls from the 70's/80's

Womens' bodies have changed so much or atleast the ideal of what a beautiful body is today is completely different than 20-30 years ago.

I like the 70's and 80's models...little makeup, they look fresh, natural - more like real women than today's models.

There is an easy formula for solving this equation:

The less taboo nude modeling becomes.
The higher the quantity of models willing to do full frontal nudity.
The more candidates to choose from.

No brainer - 100x more beautiful women willing to pose nude today as compared with the 70's.

As for the question of are there girls doing hardcore that are as gorgeous as the playmates of yesteryear...yes...a girl like Hayden Winters could have made playmate of the year in the 70's.

70's by a fucking MILE! Today's girls are cookie cutters. I like unique porn stars like Faye Reagan etc.

Fuck all these fake tit, beach blonde bimbo sluts.

I totally agree...
70s/80 = Diamonds, like finding needles in a haystack.
NOW = Dime-a-Dozen bimbos for the most part...

Even "Playboy Plus" = Playboy "we'll put almost any nude bitch up on our site"...

I wish to posit that hot is hot no matter what decade or epoch. Fashions may be cyclical to some extent but beauty is a constant in any age.

All that really changes is the eye of the beholder, and we all know that is completely subjective. :2 cents:

no matter what happens, it can never be as hot as this!

http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enha...5422312-21.jpg

you look at these photos and you know these girls have a warm personality.
they light up a room, smile rarely leaves their face, they are approachable.

no doubt i would have a better time in the sack with one of these girls than most pornstars.

70/80's got my vote

funny how its not really a contest of what people like better but a lot of the content shooters on here are coming up with lame excuses of why today's content is far superior.

Kind of reminds me of people on this board bitching about girls with tattoos then Christie Mack wins Miss Free Ones (voted on by fans)

I remember having a major crush on Barbie Benton and Tanya Roberts when I was a kid. But I like today's girl's better. The hairstyles, the clothes the fitness level...it all looks better to me.

decent evidence you have put forward there

I think the Playboy models of the past are a whole lot better than the Playboy models of today. There was more of a purest feeling to them. Beautiful unaltered women. The kind of woman you wanted to marry. Today Playboy goes for the fake boobs and tattoos. The hooker looking type IMO. The kind of woman you just want to grudge fuck and leave. Those women are a dime a dozen and nothing special. So Playboy is no longer special.

To me sites like Femjoy still carry beautiful natural women. Unfortunately though those sites leave nothing to the imagination anymore.

This is the 2012 Playmate of the year. I think she looks pretty hot.
Also keep in mind that the older girls HAD to have a big bush. Yeah, I know most girls had bush back then...but they had to keep it real thick and long for Playboy to keep them out of legal trouble so no hint of the actual vagina lips would show.

Anyway...I think the 2012 Playmate Of The Year does NOT look like a hooker that I want to grudge fuck with tattoos, etc that everyone is talking about. She looks like a really pretty girl naked.

http://www.funandmisc.com/wp-content...gallery-19.jpg

Let's look at all the Playmates of 2012 so we can compare them to the 1970 ones.
Other than the 1970 makeup artist specifically using less base to show off the girls freckles for that "California Girl" who has been basking in the sun look..I think the photography and the girls are on par (and no...contrary to some posts in this thread, there are NO tattoos or "hookers I want to grudge fuck"):

http://www.playboywiki.com/file/view...Knox-Rvw2c.jpg

http://www.playboywiki.com/file/view...ll-prvw16c.jpg

http://www.playboywiki.com/file/view...iffert-14c.jpg

http://www.playboywiki.com/file/view...Pomplun-3c.jpg

http://www.playboywiki.com/file/view...iLeigh-14c.jpg

http://www.playboywiki.com/file/view...aTalon-14c.jpg

http://www.playboywiki.com/file/view...es-prvw21c.jpg

http://www.playboywiki.com/file/view...s-WoP4-34c.jpg

http://www.playboywiki.com/file/view...aCampos-9c.jpg

http://www.playboywiki.com/file/view...aHorton-6c.jpg

http://www.playboywiki.com/file/view...nyNola-33c.jpg

http://www.playboywiki.com/file/view...Streich-7c.jpg

Dat 70's bush

hated the 70'd bush! :1orglaugh Reminds me too much of eating out untrimmed girls in the 80's since girls didn't even trim them unless it was summer bikini time

Me I liked the 90's playmates the best. :thumbsup
http://i.imgur.com/Gebzl.png

and let's not forget the late 90's brought us the triplets
http://www.playboy.si/media/cache/Ph...lery_image.jpg

I think the 70's photos have more to do with the photographer's style than the girls themselves.

He has every girl giving a big smile for instance.

Whereas the modern photographers have all the girls giving that "come hither", "sexy" and sultry gaze in all the pictures.

Makes the 1970's ones feel warm and fuzzy. Makes the newer ones look more "pro" (whore in laymans terms lol).

Can't you just imagine mounting her back in the day and having both those tits in your hands squeezing while you pounded it? :jerkoff

That was Hef's girl, only reason I ever watched Hee Haw was for Barbie Benton and Misty Rowe. I wonder if any of those old country singers in their bib overalls ever plowed their fields.