Adolf Hitler On Gun Control

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • AdultPornMasta
    Confirmed User
    • May 2012
    • 1506
    #1

    Adolf Hitler On Gun Control

    ""The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country." --Adolf Hitler"

    Adolf Hitler, dinner talk on April 11, 1942, quoted in Hitler's Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations, Second Edition (1973), Pg. 425-426. Translated by Norman Cameron and R. H. Stevens. Introduced and with a new preface by H. R. Trevor-Roper. The original German papers were known as Bormann-Vermerke.





    SEIG!

    HEIL!

    ALL HAIL OBAMA!

    "The world is full of obvious things which nobody by any chance ever observes."
    Tags: None
    • Kolargol
      Confirmed User
      • Mar 2003
      • 1319
      #2
      he also liked cucumbers

        Comment

        • Mutt
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Sep 2002
          • 34431
          #3
          Originally posted by AdultPornMasta
          ""The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or native police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order throughout the occupied Russian territories, and a system of military strong-points must be evolved to cover the entire occupied country." --Adolf Hitler"
          thanks for your obligatory 'old kook' contribution to any debate. Hitler was talking about disarming a conquered nation's people. only a paranoid wackjob draws a comparison between that and a sovereign nation's democratically elected government enacting gun control laws for its own people.
          I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!

            Comment

            • EddyTheDog
              Just Doing My Own Thing
              • Jan 2011
              • 25433
              #4
              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

              Godwin's law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies or Godwin's Law of Nazi Analogies[1][2]) is an assertion made by Mike Godwin in 1990[2] that has become an Internet adage. It states: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."[2][3] In other words, Godwin said that, given enough time, in any online discussion?regardless of topic or scope?someone inevitably makes a comparison to Hitler or the Nazis.
              Although in one of its early forms Godwin's law referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions,[4] the law is now often applied to any threaded online discussion, such as forums, chat rooms and blog comment threads, and has been invoked for the inappropriate use of Nazi analogies in articles or speeches.[5]
              In 2012, "Godwin's Law" became an entry in the third edition of the Oxford English Dictionary.[6]

                Comment

                • tony286
                  lurker
                  • Aug 2002
                  • 57021
                  #5
                  http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/stop..._about_hitler/
                  "
                  University of Chicago law professor Bernard Harcourt explored this myth in depth in a 2004 article published in the Fordham Law Review. As it turns out, the Weimar Republic, the German government that immediately preceded Hitler’s, actually had tougher gun laws than the Nazi regime. After its defeat in World War I, and agreeing to the harsh surrender terms laid out in the Treaty of Versailles, the German legislature in 1919 passed a law that effectively banned all private firearm possession, leading the government to confiscate guns already in circulation. In 1928, the Reichstag relaxed the regulation a bit, but put in place a strict registration regime that required citizens to acquire separate permits to own guns, sell them or carry them.

                  The 1938 law signed by Hitler that LaPierre mentions in his book basically does the opposite of what he says it did. “The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition,” Harcourt wrote. Meanwhile, many more categories of people, including Nazi party members, were exempted from gun ownership regulations altogether, while the legal age of purchase was lowered from 20 to 18, and permit lengths were extended from one year to three years."

                  Gun registration is Hitler but taking away an american citizen rights that's ok which is what republicans wanted to do to the boston bomber. So is it a rights issue or is it if it doesnt effect me I dont care?

                    Comment

                    • purecane
                      Annakin Skywalker
                      • Jan 2013
                      • 1324
                      #6
                      before i start, i am NOT condoning Hitler's actions, however, there is no comparison to his aganda and obamas. hitler wanted to unify his country, by winning the hearts and minds of his people he accomplished that. obama on the other hand, is trying to destroy us, because clearly, he IS NOT an american and has no loyalty to "we the people".
                      [email protected]

                        Comment

                        • EddyTheDog
                          Just Doing My Own Thing
                          • Jan 2011
                          • 25433
                          #7
                          Originally posted by purecane73
                          before i start, i am NOT condoning Hitler's actions, however, there is no comparison to his aganda and obamas. hitler wanted to unify his country, by winning the hearts and minds of his people he accomplished that. obama on the other hand, is trying to destroy us, because clearly, he IS NOT an american and has no loyalty to "we the people".
                          Oh dear god - Not another one?

                          This place breeds nutters....

                            Comment

                            • PR_Glen
                              Confirmed User
                              • Oct 2006
                              • 9058
                              #8
                              Originally posted by EddyTheDog
                              Oh dear god - Not another one?

                              This place breeds nutters....
                              what do you expect? this site ranks for this shit now..
                              webmaster at pimproll dot com

                                Comment

                                • tony286
                                  lurker
                                  • Aug 2002
                                  • 57021
                                  #9
                                  Originally posted by PR_Glen
                                  what do you expect? this site ranks for this shit now..
                                  Yeah isnt it crazy. Is Theo trying to run everyone off?

                                    Comment

                                    • SuckOnThis
                                      So Fucking Banned
                                      • Oct 2003
                                      • 6844
                                      #10
                                      Hitler loosened the tight gun control that was imposed in Germany after WW1 you moron.

                                      Does that tickle your clit?

                                        Comment

                                        • Rochard
                                          Jägermeister Test Pilot
                                          • Dec 2001
                                          • 75736
                                          #11
                                          So Hitler wanted to disarm the people in the countries he just invaded? Seems like a good idea to me - You wouldn't want the population of country you just bitch smacked to rise up and fight back now would you?

                                          Originally posted by AdultPornMasta
                                          Hitler's Table Talk 1941-44: His Private Conversations, Second Edition (1973)
                                          Damn, Amazon wants $125 for this book new. Damn.
                                          Herschel Savage
                                          Brooklyn, NY

                                            Comment

                                            Previous template Next
                                            Working...