GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   OK, So now pilots can have a handgun in the cockpit. What do you think? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=109607)

BV 02-19-2003 03:55 PM

OK, So now pilots can have a handgun in the cockpit. What do you think?
 
I am pro firearms and I think it's a bad idea. What are your views?

sexysphere 02-19-2003 04:02 PM

i juste hop they wont shoot me :Graucho

Dirty1 02-19-2003 04:03 PM

Why not? They already have the lives of everybody in their hands.

Mr.Fiction 02-19-2003 04:05 PM

Sounds like a stupid idea.

We'll see what happens during the first emergency with an armed pilot - will the pilot save the day, will the gun fall into the wrong hands, will someone shoot the controls or an innocent person, or will the pilot go crazy and shoot everyone?

We'll see.

Nysus 02-19-2003 04:18 PM

Why not just have a tranquilizer dart gun? Or a stun gun?

Cheers,
Matt

Cyber3 02-19-2003 04:26 PM

Great first we had drunks in the cockpit, now they are really loaded:ak47:

Regards,

Kevin

EscortBiz 02-19-2003 04:30 PM

wont be long before they fuck up

extreme 02-19-2003 04:32 PM

"Pilot shoot snoring co-pilot"

It's a great idea.

Backov 02-19-2003 04:33 PM

Great idea! Now the terrorists don't even have to try to get anything past security.. 3 or 4 of them rush the cockpit, break through the door and they've got their own handgun.. Maybe they lose one or two guys, but hey, what were they gonna do anyway- survive?

Dumb fucking idea.

PaulSweet 02-19-2003 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nysus
Why not just have a tranquilizer dart gun? Or a stun gun?

Cheers,
Matt

Exactly - having any real guns in a pressurized tube is just asking for trouble. What happens when they kill the terrorist and the bullet travels through the persons body straight out of the plane. Once the bullet punctures the airplanes skin the pressure differential is going to tear a huge hole in the plane and everyone is going to get sucked out to their deaths. Those still buckled in who don't suffocate are going to die as the plane comes spinning out of the sky.

What is this solving?

12clicks 02-19-2003 05:54 PM

I had no idea there were so many sniviling pansies on this board.:thumbsup

XxXotic 02-19-2003 05:57 PM

why the hell not. shit, waste all the planes arsenal, land the motherfucker and get out bustin caps. fuck'em all :thumbsup

traffictrader 02-19-2003 05:58 PM

havent we all seen Con-air. we all know what will happen.

Lane 02-19-2003 06:00 PM

how about just put a security officer instead?

Muff 02-19-2003 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PaulSweet


Exactly - having any real guns in a pressurized tube is just asking for trouble. What happens when they kill the terrorist and the bullet travels through the persons body straight out of the plane. Once the bullet punctures the airplanes skin the pressure differential is going to tear a huge hole in the plane and everyone is going to get sucked out to their deaths. Those still buckled in who don't suffocate are going to die as the plane comes spinning out of the sky.

What is this solving?

I doubt they will give them any powerful guns. Probably something like a .22 or a .38.

It would be very hard to get through the glass or the walls of an airplane even with something more powerful.

Muff 02-19-2003 06:14 PM

Actually the are giving them 40 calibre handguns.

Heres the CNN article. The will only be allowed to use them in the cockpit.

http://www.cnn.com/2003/TRAVEL/02/19...uns/index.html

Gutterboy 02-19-2003 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PaulSweet


Exactly - having any real guns in a pressurized tube is just asking for trouble. What happens when they kill the terrorist and the bullet travels through the persons body straight out of the plane.

Subsonic rounds + soft expanding bullets maybe? .40 caliber sounds about right to do that sort of thing with.

TheJimmy 02-19-2003 06:31 PM

I don't have a problem with that at all...as long as they have the serious training to back up the new equipment I think it's a good idea.

And like someone else mentioned they already have everyone's lives in their hands as it is....

Gutterboy 02-19-2003 06:36 PM

I'm more worried about the fact that all our defense measures seem to be going towards fighting yesterdays war, the one we lost on Sept. 11th. Pilots with guns, anti-aircraft missile deployments and shit.. the terrorists aren't going to try hijacking commercial jets again. It'll be dirty bombs, surface to air shoulder launched weapons, or some other shit we don't expect and are least prepared for.

TheJimmy 02-19-2003 06:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gutterboy
I'm more worried about the fact that all our defense measures seem to be going towards fighting yesterdays war, the one we lost on Sept. 11th. Pilots with guns, anti-aircraft missile deployments and shit.. the terrorists aren't going to try hijacking commercial jets again. It'll be dirty bombs, surface to air shoulder launched weapons, or some other shit we don't expect and are least prepared for.

good point

wish they's start blowing more money on CIA ops as well instead of spending cash on stripping us of our privacy....just let the CIA dudes get as dirty as they need to to get the job done...and call it a day...

Marcus 02-19-2003 06:45 PM

Weren't we supposed to have disguised sky marshalls and shit on every flight?
is that happenning?

Jon 02-19-2003 06:48 PM

if they can have handguns, then we should be able to have full fledged automatic rifles.. because we are paying customers, and they need to keep us happy.

dirtyone 02-19-2003 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BV
I am pro firearms and I think it's a bad idea. What are your views?

My view is the same as before they had guns... Don't fuck with the pilots.

XXXManager 02-19-2003 07:10 PM

Difficult subject.
Only thing I can say is - guns should be given only to people who REALLY know how to handle them. There are much better ways than arming pilots. Check what El-Al is doing (Israeli air-line) [actually its the government rather then the airline]

bulletproofservers 02-19-2003 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by PaulSweet


Exactly - having any real guns in a pressurized tube is just asking for trouble. What happens when they kill the terrorist and the bullet travels through the persons body straight out of the plane. Once the bullet punctures the airplanes skin the pressure differential is going to tear a huge hole in the plane and everyone is going to get sucked out to their deaths. Those still buckled in who don't suffocate are going to die as the plane comes spinning out of the sky.

What is this solving?

Very graphic. :thumbsup

sumphatpimp 02-19-2003 08:53 PM

sign on cockpit door


your pilot today is (womans name)

I have PMS and a GUN

you feeling lucky today Alleybaba !

wethoney 02-19-2003 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Nysus
Why not just have a tranquilizer dart gun? Or a stun gun?

Cheers,
Matt


I agree a Stun Gun seems like a better Idea to me. That way you don't blow a hole in a window at 30,000 feet by accident.

MetaMan 02-19-2003 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BV
I am pro firearms and I think it's a bad idea. What are your views?
guns!?

give em a bazooka and see who is gonna fuck round now!

haggard 02-19-2003 09:02 PM

bought time they got firearms in the cockpit. you would of thought they would of let pilots have guns long time ago.

TheJimmy 02-19-2003 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by XXXManager
Difficult subject.
Only thing I can say is - guns should be given only to people who REALLY know how to handle them. There are much better ways than arming pilots. Check what El-Al is doing (Israeli air-line) [actually its the government rather then the airline]


the Israeli's even had to take out a psycho fuck in LAX...

they know what they're doing when it comes to security and protecting people's lives as much as possible.


:thumbsup :thumbsup

<IMX> 02-19-2003 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Backov
Great idea! Now the terrorists don't even have to try to get anything past security.. 3 or 4 of them rush the cockpit, break through the door and they've got their own handgun.. Maybe they lose one or two guys, but hey, what were they gonna do anyway- survive?

Dumb fucking idea.

I agree. Now, there is at least one gun on the plane. That allows a new strategy for a potential group of jackers. Especially if pilots "think" they can handle the problem.

The goal should be land the damn plane asap when any issue arises. Therefore, the doors should be made inpenetrable, and the doors should close before passengers are on board, and open after they have left the plane. Very simple.

These strategies, just like "increased" airport / airplane security seem to ignore the fundamental premise of the 9/11 attack.

The terrorists followed the rules , and were extremely successful (3/4).
And were probably able to abort other attempts without being captured...which I find more problematic, and less focused on by any intel agency.

The next attempt will follow the rules, and exploit inadequate policy in the existing security.

Probably terrorists disguised as pilots/flight crew/maintence will walk right on the damn plane, and commender the gun to use on a "group of terrorists."

We will see how long it takes for a gun mishap / drunk pilot / new exploit.



:2 cents:

FlyingIguana 02-19-2003 10:02 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BV
I am pro firearms and I think it's a bad idea. What are your views?
i just hope they're a good shot...

Easton 02-19-2003 10:06 PM

it'd be nice if the pilots would blow the heads off those annoying people who get up every 30 minutes to go to the can :1orglaugh

kmanrox 02-19-2003 10:09 PM

it wont matter, the terrorists will never get the opportunity to invade a cockpit ever again anyhow... they will have had moved on to different ways to fuck up americans...

BV 02-19-2003 10:10 PM

maybe no cockpit door at all?, just a bulletproof, gas proof self contained cockpit with a 3 or 4 man crew.

stocktrader23 02-20-2003 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BV
I am pro firearms and I think it's a bad idea. What are your views?
Well as long as we have planes full of passengers that would allow terrorists to run them into buildings I would rather they have a gun.

xxxinnovations 02-20-2003 12:09 AM

unless you're trying to hijack the plane... i dont think you have to worry about it

:thumbsup

nofx 02-20-2003 12:09 AM

I have a better idea than guns, just rig the whole plane, besides the cockpit, with sleeping gas outlets. The pilots then could just press a button and put everyone to sleep and when everyone is asleep, throw the terrorists out of the plane.

BV 02-20-2003 12:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by nofx
I have a better idea than guns, just rig the whole plane, besides the cockpit, with sleeping gas outlets. The pilots then could just press a button and put everyone to sleep and when everyone is asleep, throw the terrorists out of the plane.
Or depressurize the cabin slightly, at a high altitude you would pass out with lack of enough oxygen. Pilots could then use their oxygen masks and just deactivate the passenger compartment emergency masks, after everyone is passed out they could run back and slit hijackers throats and feel up the stewardesses a little bit.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123