![]() |
Scumbags that makes our industry look bad.
Dear fellow webmasters, content producers and affiliates. I would like to bring your attention to the page 2 of this amazing tread about 35pps so you can read all the idiotic answers that are given to me and other webmasters when we put them on the spot with real facts. Ask yourself this question... why do we allow such criminal activity in our beautiful industry and let these people freely advertise their crimes on this forums? Please read the tread and don't let it die because everybody have to know. This is an actual good debate for our industry. How long will we let those people cut the grass under our feet and take our hard earned money? CLICK HERE TO READ THE TREAD |
Lol, those idiots at 35pps are mad at you because you expose them stealing content instead of sending dmca?
What a bunch of idiots! |
bump for segpay / ccbill and zambio - for processing
|
read the tread people!
oh, and that mandy... nice. wowsers. Quote:
|
En anglais, c'est "thread", mon petit chou :)
Still looks like a lot of your stuff is up on PornHub etc too? How is removing those going? |
|
That is fucked up
|
keep up the good fight Ariel!
|
Quote:
Or do you mean other criminals who you're not friends with? |
Quote:
Pour repondre a ta question, ils sont super sympa et je n'ai qu'a leur envoyer les liens des videos moi meme et c'est elever dans la journee ou la prochaine :) Ils sont tres cool donc j'ai pas de problemes avec eux :) Ce qu'il y a sur pornhub en majoriter sont des videos que j'ai moi meme ajouter et quelques autres que j'autorise :) |
A person pretending to be a porn model is starting a thread about the scum of this industry? Ironic.
|
Cliff notes?
And yes, there will always be scumbags and cheaters in our business. |
|
Quote:
My "friends" like you said, have been dealt with and everything that is on their site have been either authorized and posted by me, or I know about it and decide to leave the full video there for promo. When I have a problem with something on their site, I only have to send them a friendly message, no DMCA and they remove it the same day or the next one :) It's easy, friendly and I'm not getting retarded answers like the miss from 35pps. Plus, you're trying to compare a user generated content website and a "webmaster" launching a paysite seeking for affiliates... apples and oranges much? :P lol |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh . |
Ariel is one of the few porn models that isn't actually a man. I think you have her mixed up with Lightspeed.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
How do you know $35PPS doesn't have a site where they collect user submitted content so they can build new sites with it? I doubt they do, but how do we know they don't? But if they do, then the content on their site is 100% like the content on PornHub, and they are equally "criminal" as you called the one you don't know. The truth is, neither of us know exactly how your content ended up on either site. All we know is what we are told. And we both know this industry is FULL of liars. Sometimes those we thinnk are "friends" turn out to be the worst of them all. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
. |
Quote:
|
I like your breasts. I wouldn't be mean with them. I promise!
|
You get them Ariel!
|
I love Ariel. Bump for you.
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Good Luck Ariel hope finally someone does something to these idiots
|
Quote:
. |
I'm surprised this day didn't arrive sooner :2 cents:
|
Quote:
Of course it's you posting. However you are not Ariel and we both know that. Make all the posts, tweets, fan signs you like. You're not the first to play this game. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Rather old - but always a good legal reference from 2000.
------------------------------------------------------ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SUZE RANDALL PHOTOGRAPHY, GENERAL MEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., WENDY M., and SHANNON B., Plaintiff, vs. REACTOR, INC., MICHAEL SAENZ, MAX SHERIDAN and DOES 1-10, Defendants. No. 99 C 7812 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs sued the defendants for copyright infringement and for other claims based on their use of copyrighted photographs on their internet website relating to an adult entertainment business. Defendants were served but they did not appear or respond. We earlier entered an injunction as a result of that default, but we deferred entering a money judgment pending further justification of the amounts claimed. That justification has now been furnished. In the meantime, the corporate defendant and Saenz have filed for protection in bankruptcy. We dismiss them without prejudice and with leave to reinstate. Accordingly, we assess damages only against defendant Max Sheridan. According to the documented assertions of plaintiffs (and we have no reason to doubt them), the individual defendants were the principals of the corporation defendant controlling the website. They continued to use eleven photographs, despite several cease-and-desist letters, deleted the plaintiffs' copyright notices from the photographs, and asserted that the corporate defendant had the full copyrights in the works and would vigorously pursue any copyright violations. That all adds up to $100,000 in statutory copyright infringement damages per infringement for willful violations, up to $25,000 for each violation of Copyright Information management tampering, up to $1,000 each for violation of the Illinois Right of Publicity Statute, trebled as a sanction, together with costs and attorneys' fees, (not including damage claims on various other counts). Plaintiffs seek the maximum amount $1,407,000, plus $16,171.14 in fees both because the documented infringements undoubtedly understate by multiples the actual infringements and do not reflect secondary publication through downloading by internet users and because of the need to deter flagrant willful misuse. While we are sympathetic to plaintiffs' concerns, we think that figure is excessive in the absence of hard evidence of actual publication. We award $150,000 for copyright infringement, $150,000 for the tampering, $22,000 for the state violation, and $16,171.14 in fees, for a total of $338,171.14. ________________________________________ JAMES B. MORAN Senior Judge, U.S. District Court May 11, 2000. |
Bummp for Ariel
|
Quote:
She wears a PornHub shirt then bitches about industry scumbags! She's talking out of the side of her ass again! Give it 2 more years and she'll be washed up like Christina Model! (But atleast Christina's snatch looks eatable!) |
Quote:
. |
Quote:
|
Ariel, speaking of scumbags I submitted a ticket on your site with a blog that has 15 GB of your videos indexed using extabit.
Please look for that ticket and take action on what I said :2 cents: I figured you might be one to help. :thumbsup |
Quote:
Maybe a Brazilian reconstruction. |
I set the over/under on them replying to this thread at 2%. I'll take the under.
|
I remove my links now! I have to spend two hours in Las Vegas wasting my time on these assholes. Unreal mother fuckers!
|
Quote:
|
good reputation - loyal local fans , bad reputation - loyal global fans = profit :pimp
|
Bump for Ariel! :pimp
|
Bumped the thread and adding Kristine/35pps to my scammers list.
That is just crazy, her response to stolen contents, she needs to be in jail or something. |
is 35pps.com down ? I can't load it, keep getting a
504 Gateway Time-out error |
would be nice to know the number of affiliates that are supporting them. Some guys really don't give a fuck
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123