GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   webmasters have no standards anymore (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=109127)

MetaformX 02-17-2003 10:25 PM

webmasters have no standards anymore
 
I see it everyday on this board...Someone posts a picture of a girl with skanky hair and bad teeth and ugly face, and just because she is naked, everyone sais she is fine.

I think that people's standards go to hell once you look at porn for a long time.

UnseenWorld 02-17-2003 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaformX
I see it everyday on this board...Someone posts a picture of a girl with skanky hair and bad teeth and ugly face, and just because she is naked, everyone sais she is fine.

I think that people's standards go to hell once you look at porn for a long time.

Hmm. I have found the opposite as well: Put up a girl that you know 90% of these guys would walk on glowing coals for the privilege of chewing on her undies, and they will pretend that she's the ugliest skag they've ever seen.

They just enjoy getting other people riled up by stating and then defending the opposite of the truth.

Kris 02-17-2003 10:28 PM

i agree with meta... i see so many fucking dogs that ppl here say are incredible. it's about time someone said something.. way to go meta!

Zorgman 02-17-2003 10:29 PM

2 holes and a heartbeat is all that is needed for some.

MetaformX 02-17-2003 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by UnseenWorld


Hmm. I have found the opposite as well: Put up a girl that you know 90% of these guys would walk on glowing coals for the privilege of chewing on her undies, and they will pretend that she's the ugliest skag they've ever seen.

They just enjoy getting other people riled up by stating and then defending the opposite of the truth.

perhaps. I guess al0ot depends on who is posting the picture, but from my experience, usually it's ugly girls who everyone thinks they are fine.

Either way though, is prolonged exposure to porn clouding our judgments?

Lethal 02-17-2003 10:30 PM

Unseen World: all of your bitches are skank. :Graucho

Zorgman: who needs a heartbeat?

Zorgman 02-17-2003 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lethal
Zorgman: who needs a heartbeat?
Whatever gets you off I guess. You sick bastard.. MaHahahahah :)

Pipecrew 02-17-2003 10:47 PM

I agree with meta... I wonder if you are going to get attacked again for saying this :1orglaugh

G Sharp 02-17-2003 10:50 PM

Some questions:

Do all traffic sources subscribe to the same "standard" of beauty?

Is there a difference between "amateur" beauty and Mac & Bumble type beauty? Will this difference translate to differing traffic pools/ sources?

Do some traffic pools equate young age [18 to 21] with beauty? As the model gets older, does the standard become more stringent?

jim manly 02-17-2003 10:50 PM

Did this post from Dugmor make you finally say this?
How cute is this girl?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

MetaformX 02-17-2003 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kris
i agree with meta... i see so many fucking dogs that ppl here say are incredible. it's about time someone said something.. way to go meta!
hehe, thank you Kris
This is a epidemic in the webmaster community, and I am worried about the well being of everyone :1orglaugh

MetaformX 02-17-2003 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pipecrew
I agree with meta... I wonder if you are going to get attacked again for saying this :1orglaugh
heh, I have taken the neccesary percautions, such as wearing protective head gear and knee pads(knee pads are for the BJ's after)

MetaformX 02-17-2003 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jim manly
Did this post from Dugmor make you finally say this?
How cute is this girl?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Funny you say that, because yes, that is the post that inspired it. Nothing against dugmore and the boys ofcourse.

Just that chick has the ugliest face....and everyone is saying how cute she is.
I'll quote john stossel...Gimme a break!

p00p 02-17-2003 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaformX
I see it everyday on this board...Someone posts a picture of a girl with skanky hair and bad teeth and ugly face, and just because she is naked, everyone sais she is fine.

I think that people's standards go to hell once you look at porn for a long time.

Surfers standards do, too. There are a lot of 'ugly' women on the net making bank big time. And lot of perfect 10's making nada, nothing, zilch. :2 cents:

G Sharp 02-17-2003 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by p00p


Surfers standards do, too. There are a lot of 'ugly' women on the net making bank big time. And lot of perfect 10's making nada, nothing, zilch. :2 cents:

Thank You! Key is--it totally depends on your traffic. Its really hard converting a traffic pool used to "Perfect 10" content with "Hood Ratz" pics...and vice versea :thumbsup

badmunchkin 02-17-2003 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaformX


Funny you say that, because yes, that is the post that inspired it. Nothing against dugmore and the boys ofcourse.

Just that chick has the ugliest face....and everyone is saying how cute she is.
I'll quote john stossel...Gimme a break!

I think people were being a bit generous because the girl was right there viewing all the responses. I know this is gfy but there's no reason to be an a-hole & insult a girl to her face. She wasn't a supermodel, but she wasn't Mimi from Drew Carey or anything. She was cute enough & with some well-applied makeup she could look very doable. A lot of the online audience I think prefers seeing obtainable "real" girls now over glossed over supermodels IMO. There is a market for it, there's tons of amateur sites making serious cash doing this.

chodadog 02-17-2003 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaformX
Just that chick has the ugliest face....and everyone is saying how cute she is.
I'll quote john stossel...Gimme a break!

I can see how some guys would go for her, but damn, not doing anything for me. And i was quite surprised by the overwhelming "yes, she is cute" response.

Gman.357 02-17-2003 11:11 PM

It's all a matter of opinion. Personally, I'd take the average "girl next door" look over a fake, cookie-cut supermodel poser any day.

Perfect chicks bore me.

:(

drunkdollars 02-17-2003 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Zorgman
2 holes and a heartbeat is all that is needed for some.

That would be gay no?
Girls have 2 holes I always thought

FlyingIguana 02-17-2003 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaformX
I see it everyday on this board...Someone posts a picture of a girl with skanky hair and bad teeth and ugly face, and just because she is naked, everyone sais she is fine.

I think that people's standards go to hell once you look at porn for a long time.

please, you'd hit it too

MetaformX 02-17-2003 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by FlyingIguana


please, you'd hit it too

haha
hell no. Im sure she has a wonderfull personality and all...but I dunno :warning

smut4all 02-18-2003 12:04 AM

Come on guys be nice, not every girl is going to look like a supermodel, that's why a lot of people like the girl next door type of a look or an amateur look. She's not ugly... I don't think she's hot but depending on what her niche is going to be for her site, she has potential to make some money. Good luck to her

MetaformX 02-18-2003 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by smut4all
Come on guys be nice, not every girl is going to look like a supermodel, that's why a lot of people like the girl next door type of a look or an amateur look. She's not ugly... I don't think she's hot but depending on what her niche is going to be for her site, she has potential to make some money. Good luck to her
okay, maybe some clarification is needed.
I am not saying she has no business being in this biz...there prolly will be a niche for her and im sure she will do ok...

I am not singling her out by any means, if it's not her, its some other girl tomorow that will be average and everyone will fall in love with. Either everyone is just being nice for the sake of not offending anyone by saying she is 'hot' or they really think she is hot, which would mean peoples standards have changed for the worst

SleazyDream 02-18-2003 12:10 AM

since when did meta have standards?

smut4all 02-18-2003 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaformX


okay, maybe some clarification is needed.
I am not saying she has no business being in this biz...there prolly will be a niche for her and im sure she will do ok...

I am not singling her out by any means, if it's not her, its some other girl tomorow that will be average and everyone will fall in love with. Either everyone is just being nice for the sake of not offending anyone by saying she is 'hot' or they really think she is hot, which would mean peoples standards have changed for the worst

agreed

MetaformX 02-18-2003 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
since when did meta have standards?
I use to have standards...it is slipping though on a daily basis. I can just feel it.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123