Palestinians win upgraded UN status by wide margin
 

That's a slam-dunk! :2 cents:

"The assembly voted 138-9 in favour, with 41 nations abstaining"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-20550864

The UN General Assembly has voted to grant the Palestinians non-member observer state status - a move opposed by Israel and the US.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas told the assembly the vote was the "last chance to save the two-state solution" with Israel.

Israel's ambassador to the UN, Ron Prosor, said the bid "doesn't advance peace - it pushes it backwards".

The assembly voted 138-9 in favour, with 41 nations abstaining.
'Birth certificate'

"Sixty-five years ago on this day, the United Nations General Assembly adopted resolution 181, which partitioned the land of historic Palestine into two states and became the birth certificate for Israel," Mr Abbas told the assembly.

"The General Assembly is called upon today to issue a birth certificate of the reality of the State of Palestine," he said.

Mr Prosor said "the only way to reach peace is through agreements" between the parties, not at the UN.

"No decision by the UN can break the 4,000-year-old bond between the people of Israel and the land of Israel," he said.

Opponents of the bid say a Palestinian state should emerge only out of bilateral negotiations, as set out in the 1993 Oslo peace accords under which the Palestinian Authority was established.

Speaking after the vote, the US ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, urged the Palestinians and Israel to resume direct peace talks and warned against unilateral actions.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called the vote "unfortunate and counter-productive", saying it put more obstacles on the path to peace.
Symbolic milestone

The Palestinians are seeking UN recognition of a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem, the lands Israel captured in 1967.

France, Spain and Norway are among those urging the General Assembly to raise the Palestinians' UN status. Germany was set to abstain.

While the move is seen as a symbolic milestone in Palestinian ambitions for statehood, the "Yes" vote will also have a practical diplomatic effect, says the BBC's Barbara Plett, at the UN.

It would allow the Palestinians to participate in debates at the UN and improve their chances of joining UN agencies and bodies like the International Criminal Court.

Last year, Mr Abbas asked the UN Security Council to admit the Palestinians as a member state, but that was opposed by the US.

well lets hope that both Israel and Palestine stop lobbing rockets at each other

People get their land stolen from them and then get oppressed and you don't expect them to be upset and do things like "lob rockets?"

That's the most important thing, you're right halfpint :thumbsup

Nothing will stop that.

I never said that, I said "I hope they both stop lobing rockets at each other"

Yes I do not aggree with what Israel has done to Palestine but to keep on killing each other has got them nowhere nor will it in the future, and most of the people who are getting killed over it, are civilians.

They should just relocate Israel to New York. Problem solved. lol

If only it was that simple...

The Canadian Conservative government have their heads so far up Israel's ass they don't know what time of day it is. They actually voted no on this. How fucking out of touch are these ass clowns? They definitely don't speak for the majority of Canadians thats for sure.

The Zionist influence runs deep...

out of touch?!

statesman of ht world bitchez! :upsidedow

Arizona has been discussed at a high level, with $1 million being handed to each Israeli :2 cents:

I think the Palestinians should be allowed to create a state. No reason not to.

However, the next time a missile is launched from Palestinian areas, the new Palestinian government is held responsible. And when it happens, it is considered an act of war.

The Israeli are so good at marketing themselves as the good guys it is total bull shit.

Own the land from 5000 years ago?
So if the American natives wanted their own land back and started settlements and then started pushing those borders to expand their nation, that would be fine then right?