![]() |
Pedo books
Just a question for all of you to think about: should pedophile fiction be banned or not? In other words, should books, stories, etc describing sex with minors be legal or illegal?
|
I think the people reading them should hung by their genitals...:ak47:
|
of course it should be illegal !!! :mad:
those mofos should look for something which is about their age!! :BangBang: |
Mind you, I'm not talking about pictures, but fiction, stories.
|
No fiction should be illegal. None.
If you do that, you might as well forget about free speech at all. |
but people who like stories, fiction etc. might also like to see pictures, and whats even worse, they want more than only to see pictures. so no stories/fiction at all.
i mean this has nothing to do with free speech in my opinion. |
Quote:
People who play video games might kill people. People who read a book about politics might kill the president. That argument holds no water. Free speech is the cornerstone of a free society and you cannot make writing fiction illegal, no matter what. Would you make it illegal, then to write a story about a little kid who is abused by her father? Any movie or story which has sex between minors should be illegal? Any story with anything illegal in it at all? That's frightening and wrong. No fiction should be illegal. |
Ok, since Mr Fiction is ruining my plan, I might as well reveal it: if you want to ban books which contains ex with minors, you lose a huge portion of the great works of literary history, including most of greek mythology, the bible, works of shakespeare, etc.
|
All Charles Bronson movies would be banned due to the high graphic depiction of rape in most of them.
I caught one on one night, and i was surprised at how graphic the depiction of rape was. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It really all boils down to a spectrum. There is text and hand drawn cartoons one side and CGI/photo morphing and actual photos on the other side.
The US Supreme court drew the line at CGI. Some jackoffs want to draw the line at Text. Very troubling indeed. |
Interesting question but my personal opinion would be based on the context of the story if it was something that was hardcore pedo stories then yeah. But if you ban the works of every author who ever wrote anything that involved minors and sex you would have to ban Stephen King (IT), Piers Anthony and just about every book written by the author of Flowers in the Attic.
Nbritt |
Quote:
Have you seen what I am even talking about? For instance. In most movies when a 'sexual' scene comes up they cut to the morning after instead of showing the guys head drift down her body and go down on her, and show him grabbing her ass and jamming his tongue down her throat and sucking her tits... etc. They cut to the morning after, right? In some movies they show more, possibly a little nipple, some of the guys butt, some tummy and so on. But in particular its the directors choice to show further scenes of the rape instead of cutting to the 'morning after' Unless you know of what I refer, dont judge the scene. Its beyond obvious that rape is graphic, bvut in this sense the definition should be as followed as in regards to motion picture such as 'this movie has graphic violence' and/or 'graphic scenes of rape' Its not as simple as 'rape itelf is graphic.' I thought that would be beyond obvious. |
Quote:
|
If you ban fiction containing taboo subjects then you might as well ban non-fiction too. That would mean no more psychology profile articles/books of rapist & serial killers.
|
Fiction should never be illegal.
Freedom of speech is just too important. Another thing to consider is that the people reading that kind of fiction are probably pretty harmless as long as they just do that. The question is what they would do if they could no longer read their sick books. I doubt they would be magically cured. |
People will ban almost anything.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123