You all should be so fucking happy
 

You have the best job in the USA (for those of you in the USA):thumbsup

http://imagend.com/images/2012/11/13/qz2YM.jpg

that makes no sense, what's an "online employee" anyway, and what makes that job #1?

Well i hate to break it to you but only a handful here on GFY makes 130k a year lol

Out of curiosity… Did Paul Markham create that chart?

Nah it was on msnbc website
They must believe all the baller stories!

When you see the "news" report something incorrect about something you know well? Doesn't it make you wonder about everything else they claim? :winkwink:

They say
" Work from home, no degree required, easy money, growing market, blah blah blah..

Just seen it and thought I would share it.

No one here is an anesthesiologist.

That might be one of the most ridiculous charts yet

Sure it does.

I actually agree with it though.
Earning a living online is my choice every day of the week when compared with working in a factory for a short bald fuck with a complex.

Then there's another tier of earners who make these salaries look pitiful. And they barely even do any work for their money. It's all backwards.

you might be surprised
otherwise I am sure we have scammers who can pretend to be an anesthesiologist if you like

Maybe it's ranked by how lazy you can be and still earn money.

Next time I put an ad out to hire someone, I'll make sure to put that I'm seeking an "online employee". Whatever the fuck that is, lol.

So you're passing off a work from home ad that you clicked on as an MSNBC news story?

No I'm passing on the graphic that was on msnbc that was emailed to me from my neighbor actually if you're getting technical about it.

"Online Employee"?

I do NOT fucking think so! I work for NO ONE but MYSELF! "EMPLOYEE" my ass!

And yes I do very well, NOT being an "ONLINE EMPLOYEE", thank you!

:winkwink:

Source page please... :)

The OP's graphic only shows a portion of the graph - the bottom portion explains a little about how the data was compiled:

http://f89be9c2bce3a2b75341-52b70e25...012/09/img.png

At the bottom of the graph it states, that the article (which I have not read), was based upon a Money Magazine article (I believe Time/CNN owns Money magazine, not MSNBC).

ADG