Early voting puts Romney in the lead
 

Romney's leading in early voting, where 15% of Americans have already voted. It has nothing to do with the fact that the east coast is being bombarded by a deadly storm? It'll be interesting to see if it continues the same next week.

I'll declare a winner once Ohio is counted. heh

I voted a few weeks ago. I am so not about standing in line.

Voted last week

Did you read the article? It references the Politico.com poll which puts Obama in the lead, but looks to the last paragraph on a memo by someone else to predict something different :1orglaugh You don't have to stretch it buddy, Romney's already leading in early voting. lol

The Politico article they reference:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories...986.html?hp=t1

Yes, I read it. Politico is a liberal rag that will still be calling it for Obama 2 weeks after he is out of office. :1orglaugh

http://weeklystandard.com/blogs/rasm...43_658100.html

Yet, that is the poll your article is referencing, that you wanted to share. What's that say about you then? :1orglaugh

I'll see your electoral prediction with ...

Obama - 294.6 / chance of winning 72.9%
Romney - 243.4 / chance of winning 27.1%
http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/ - Nate Silver

Obama - 280 / Romney 235
http://www.electoral-vote.com/

Electoral College
Obama: 237 - Romney: 206 - Toss-up: 95 that's damn close, going to depend heavily on voter turn out

Since its unlawful to release early voting results curious where you got your facts? :winkwink:

They aren't facts, but like California, we have 55 electoral votes and it's going to Democrats

I didn't know they were allowed to release this info before the election? I thought they couldn't release it until polls have closed.

Drudge Report, duh. No one else is reliable.

I understand the electoral college, Brujah said Romney was leading in early voting and so I was curious how they would know that.

They are quoting a poll from Gallup, not the actual votes though. :upsidedow

Aren't Gallup and Rasmussen the only polls that matter?

It would be too difficult to have fair and free elections were they held within the same calendar month.

Between those two, I would always go with Rasmussen

cant believe that there is 50% people who would vote for Romney.. if the world would vote obama gets 90% guaranteed.Now either the entire the world is crazy of half of americans..

but then again, what can you say about single issue voters anyway?" romney is against abortions? he has my vote!"

bible belt will be the downfall of usa.Just imagine what would happen if bible belt separated and was a new country. This would be worse than middle east withing a decade!

Considering most Americans are the same too, it should be really easy to understand conflict in the middle east then shouldn't it?

I'm interested in the differences in the electoral predictions, so let's put them here to reflect on next week.

Rasmussen thinks Romney will win (279 - 243 (16?)), and gives him:
Florida
Ohio
Virginia
Colorado
New Hampshire

Fivethirtyeight and Electoral-vote give Florida to Romney, but Obama gets the others.

So these 5 states are the real differences it seems.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh at anyone that believes in polls when a race is this close. Well, at least it keeps you busy and off the streets....

Here's a big hint, not you, nor the polls, nor anyone else knows what's gonna happen one week from today until it happens. So just go back to watching porn and eating cheetos then going to the doctor wondering why your dick turned orange.

They are polls, not counting results.

Some people collect stamps or coins. Do you walk into their meetings and tell them what they should be doing instead? No one forced you to participate in this thread, or any other thread that you're not interested in. Move along.

And if Santa Claus won the lottery everyone in Greece would get a new Ipad.

It's always interesting to hear from the man who speaks for 90% of the people on the planet.
Do you have anymore pearls of wisdom to share with us today?

vote for howard the duck :2 cents: :thumbsup

http://content7.flixster.com/site/10...244241_ori.jpg

This article talks about how Rasmussen is full of shit.

http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp201...rasmussen.html

What do you expect from a website that has articles titled "Marvelous Mitt" and "the Omerta Administration" ?

Conservative rags are going to do all they can to make everyone think their candidate is winning, because it can have an effect on low information voters who follow the rest of the herd.

Oh, is that what Drudgereport said? Go and drink more from that right wing sewage...

http://assets.rollingstone.com/asset...1346104394.jpg

I read an article that stated Obama led Romney in the early voting 65 to 35 based on exit poll data. Digging deeper, the article failed to mention that they only polled 25-30 voters and it was in an "urban" area.

Data can be manipulated to spit out any result you want. Go to Fox News and Romney is leading. Go to Huffpo or MSNBC and Obama has a demanding lead. Polls are complete bullshit.

Exit polls are garbage as well. They tried to hit me up with one once and I lied about who got my vote. Fuck polls and fuck pollsters.

The irony of you calling Drudge "right wing sewage" and then posting a cover of Rolling Stone, which is probably more liberal than Obama himself is hilarious. Hopefully you did that on purpose.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh




.

I'm lazy to find other sites but here is one:

http://247ureports.com/poll-europe-l...refers-romney/

I's not that I made this up!

Actually no,it's not surprising!

But hey,: Romney has support in israel,pakistan,georgia,macedonia ,china and other shitty countries that I am sure Americans will be glad to be compared to.. and only in Israel does he reach more than 50% but why are we not surprised?..

edit: here is more : http://www.quora.com/How-do-people-o...mney-and-Obama