War: Good or Bad for Porn?
 

With the U.S. and Iraq on the verge of war and terrorism at a heightened threat, is porn better or worse off? Are policy makers and religious groups too concerned with other matters to look our way, or are new proposals of storing more information about Americans setting us up for trouble down the road?

Not sure. If women were going to war instead of the men it would be an easy answer. All of our troops need a laptop with satellite internet for sure. :)

as long as bush is on his crusade to dominate the world thru war, his gvmt won't be able to spend time cracking down on porn-look at just before sep 11-there was going to be a massive inquiry into rob black and max hardcore's vids-then the WTC happened and the focus luckily for porn, shifted to terrorism.

good for gay porn.

more soldiers = more gays

good for 'big cock porn' as the women will be missing their men, also good for sex toys I imagine :) and stories...

You considering freeing people from a horrible dictator and helping them set up their own independent democratic government to be dominating the world?

War is bad.. unless you work in the weapons biz, or sience. Thats what I think though. Well... depends.. without WW2... and so on.. computer technology wouldn't be where it is now...

i don't know, it seems whenever the public starts getting frightened by the US propanganda machine (heightened terror alerts all day, etc.) signup's from the US drop dramatically... so even if the bible-thumpers aren't going after us as hard, we don't make as much money either... double-edged sword of damacles..

sales have been lower since wednesday...need the troops back home so they can surf porn

good for 'big cock porn' as the women will be missing their men, also good for sex toys I imagine :) and stories...

It's weird but its good

We saw a slight increase in sign-ups on 9/11 - 9/12 -9/13 ect

I don't understand it, the last thing I was thinking about was spanking Hank but hey maybe others needed a release.

why don't you ask the people of afghanistan how our"democratic"gvmt there is doing?the warlords have already taken back most of the country and our soldiers there are being killed on a daily basis

Maybe more people stay at home?

yea, might as well bring back the taleban, they were such great guys :321GFY

look at just before sep 11-there was going to be a massive inquiry into rob black and max hardcore's vids-then the WTC happened and the focus luckily for porn

Very tasteful comment. Idiot.

Well, why don't YOU ask them? Washington continues to work with Karzai and Karzai will almost certainly push to hold free elections next year.

US has sent $700 million in various aid packages to Afghanistan -- some geared towards rebuilding. That place was and is a mess. You want it fixed in one year?

26 US soldiers killed in Afganistan from Dec 21, 2001 to Dec 21, 2002. Once again, not "another Vietnam" as some suggested before-hand. You know who you are.

Good idea
or naked girls with guns for the guys?

I think until this is resolved, the economy stays weak, all business is getting hurt not just us. You think its bad now wait gas goes to $2 to$3 a gal, then the economy is really going to crash.

Not sure I can even remember when has here was the equivalent to $4 a gallon let alone $3. Even $3 is MUCH cheaper than a good chunk of the rest of the world.

Everyone would have more money in their pockets if Bush spent more time worrying about his economy and people and less time on his massive power trip.

I think the entire economy in general gives the big picture on how much overall buisness will preform. The economy is always down before war goes way up near the end. Except if you lose.