Shut Up Bitch
 

I hear all kinds of people saying.. yeah just go blow em up, kick their ass and everything else about Iraq but are any of you "TALKERS" actually going to IRAQ to fight for the US?

It's pretty easy to talk shit sitting in your warm fuzzy seat in front of the puter rather than actually putting your ass on the line!

So until you are willing to do something to actually protect the freedom that we all love shut up bitch.

I agree, that is, if you're sitting behind iraqi lines right now, using a old commodore 64 off a hacked 2400 baud cell phone modem.

If you aren't, how exactly are you any better than them, telling them to shut the fuck up?

Then again some of us were there in 91 and were pissed we had to leave without finishing the job.

If I wasn't 12 years older and beyond the age of re-enlisting I would be geared up to go there again.

If you lived in one of the places that the Iraq regime has destroyed or demoralized you'd be welcoming the U.S. led coalition back to finish the job.

:thumbsup

Just playing devils advocate to make people "think" a little

Now I like hearing from other people that have actually been there and know their shit.

How is attacking Iraq protecting America's freedom?

Exactly

I definitely agree to an extent, but keep in mind that those soldiers who risk their lives for us, do it so we have the freedom to basically say what we want.

been there...done that... Does that count?:winkwink:

I'll kick your ass! :1orglaugh :Graucho

If you have to ask, you wouldn't understand the answer.

That goes for little miss "exactly" too.

By making them comply with the rules and regulations the rest of the civilized world have to follow.

By taking weapons away from a regime that doesn't care about humanity or the people they are even representing.

Americans are not only in America they are spread out around the world. The same way citizens from other country are also. For the first time in recorded history many of the larger powers are working together hand in hand while little piss ant countries think they can destroy freedom and security with thier attacks.

Would you like to go back to the time before the cold war stopped ? Are you old enough to know what the world was like back then?

People are so used to thier foriegn cars and furniture today they have no clue these things are either new to the world economy or if you were lucky enough to own something foreign 30 years ago how much did that piece cost you.

Please look at history before you ask a stupid question like this again.

The question was pretty good.
Your answer was not.

Iraq has many more rules and regulations to live up to than the rest of the world. Possessing weapons of mass destructions is not illegal for a country, otherwise the US would be in trouble.

The question is are the Iraqi living up to the regulations set upon them after they invaded Kuwait.

i was there last time around , i personaly feel it was a big waste of time and money
, the majority of people in the Middle East will never appriciate the West and what we have done for them.(i mean woman and children ect..)

I personaly have put my life on the line for those assholes along with many other Americans.The people in the East simply dont give a fuck , they do not value life as we do and history clearly proves that.



We are totaly capable of destroying thier country`s from right here in the USA and i feel that is the only solution to rid out the people that dont wana get along in the world.

Picking up a gun , putting your life online and going to a forgien country to fight so that others can be free , only to have those same people Hi-Jack airplanes and crash them into buildings in your own country killing thousands of your own people , is not the solution.

Destroying the middle east culture is the only solution that will ever work.

Why was it a stupid question? I just don't think America is in much danger from Iraq.

The U.S. is not a regime going around using thier weapons of mass destruction without cause for personal gain ... there is a difference.

Iraq brought the tougher rules upon themselves. If they had a regime that acted civally they wouldn't have so many rules on thier shoulders. But they choose to keep this regime in power so therefore they can live with the consequences.

Right, I agree with those restrictions.

Just don't lie and say they have to live up to the same regulations as the rest of the world.

They are living up to the same rules as the rest of the world.

If the United States used our weapons in the same manner the same regulations would be placed on the United States.

If they have special regulation they have to follow, then they surely do not have the same rules and regulations to live up to as the rest of the world.

That the same restrictions could be applied to someone else is irrelevant.

The thing is that the rest of the world should be kissing out asses for helping take out the bad guys. If it wasn't for the US, Hitler would probably still be in control over there.

What gets me is that everyone likes to jump on the US because we want to keep the world a safe place, but when the US opens their wallet, giving out MILLIONS AND BILLIONS of dollars, nobody complains about that.

Then you look at these fucking idiots in the starving countries. People are starving, their kids are starving. It's been going on for YEARS AND YEARS. You'd think that eventually they'd get their shit together and be able to take care of themselves, but instead, their starving weak asses have enough energy to keep fucking, making more and more kids to feed. I know that if barely had enough food for myself to live on, i sure the hell wouldn't make more kids, so they could be in the same predicament as myself. Instead of feeding them, we should just send over cases of condoms.

I think that our country is pretty fucking generous. We give out money that we need ourselves and we put our own lives on the line to help out others and what do we get in return ??? planes flown into our buildings and people hating us. If it was up to me, I'd pull all of our armies back home, as well as our money, and build up ourselves. FUCK the rest of the world.

Ok hows this. Before they started using thier weapons against thier own people and trying to take over other countries without prevocation they had the same rules.

But just like little kids that write on walls they now have thier crayons taken away.

Is that understandable ?

Yes, I understand and agree with the regulations.
It's just that your logic is/was flawed and you bring in irrelvant things to the discussion. You see bent on defending this flaw so continuing this discussion is pointless.

Let's continue the fun:

Probably, Without Russia the US would probably be speaking German also.

About 400,000 american soldiers lost their life in World War II.
The USSR 10,000,000 soldiers.
France: Some 250-300,000
This is all fronts btw.

http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/ww2stats.htm

Now those are some intersting stats. Thanks for the link.

Keep in mind that some of us are veterans, and just because some of the veterans may not have been at war, it does not mean they did not fight for their country.

In Korea soldiers are shot at from across the DMZ on an almost daily basis, but just because they weren't in Desert Storm per se does not make them any less of a veteran imho.

I was in the service, went in during the end of Desert Storm and served my country not in the war but surrounding countries during that time as a medic.

I think I, just like any other veteran has every right to sit behind their keyboard and say kick their ass. Every military person goes in knowing they may be called upon to fight for their country and protect the freedoms that so many other countries wish they had. In fact, people have died for you to have your opinion.

Just remember that the next veterans day that you walk passed a disabled veteran begging for change with no legs, and think about how tough you are behind your keyboard everyday.

AJ

So what you're saying is that US soldiers are better than USSR soldiers because they only lost 400,000 troops ???? ha ha ha. JUST KIDDING !!!

Yeah, you have a point there, we probably would've been screwed if it wasn't for Hitler trying to fuck the USSR and in the same sense, USSR would've been screwed if it wasn't for the US lead group of the rest of the other allies attacking on the other shores.

I'm not jew bashing here, someones race/religion doesn't make the slightest difference to my opinion of someone, and i know and like plenty of jewish people. but israel has broken twice as many un rules as iraq has, and this is one of the major reasons we are all facing so much terrorism at the moment. Don't get me wrong i don't justify any terrosism on the palestinian side whatsoever, but that hypocrisy and americas backing of it is why the gulf between the west and muslims is so big, if terrorists don't have a cause they cease to become terrorists and those issues need to be addressed along with any military action that's required, else it will never end.

I agree

I never said I agree with all our government does I just happen to agree with the policy it has on Iraq.

It's called paying taxes.
Who do you think pays for our freedom?

what was the swedish role in the war?
I forget. I'm not good at minute trivia.:1orglaugh

Surviving I suppose it could be called. :winkwink:

I support our troops. If there's gonna be a war, and american soldiers are on the front line, you sure as shit better believe I'll be waving the fucking flag and yelling "KICK THEIR ASS!" louder than any cheerleader at a pep-rally.

Everyone seems to forget that after 9/11, Bush made a speech declairing who he felt was the "Axis of Evil", and who we were going after! None of you bleeding heart wussies opened your mouth back then. Everyone backed him up because the tragic events of the Towers were still fresh in our minds. Virtually no one at the time he mentioned Iraq back then said... "No, not Iraq". The president had a 80% approval rating.

Now that the time has come to make good on what he said he was going to do back then, everyone is against it. Amazing what time can do to one's memory.

:2 cents:

id give my life for freedom.

id also take a life for freedom.

The point is Saddam Hussein is getting older, no one can tell how long he will live but his hatred for this side of the globe is known throughout the world, he will finish his legacy in Iraq by trying to destroy the USA and its allies sooner or later its just a matter of time, even if they have no weapons now or are any threat now, they soon will be and the older Hussein gets the more likely he is to strike on mass proportions.

So its either strike now or strike later?

Strike now while they are still weak?
Or strik later when hatred for the USA can be increased in the surrounding area?

if you didnt notice hatred hasnt lessoned for the USA its only getting worse, and lets just say i dont know any major countries over there with leaders under 45 which have full control over the country so they wont be leaving office soon thats for sure!

I'm not a soldier, and I'm not even a US citizen, but I do believe that a lot of military people do enjoy hearing that the people they are out there representing and defending actually support them.

I understand that Canada has announced they are sending more forces to Afganistan, and also are considering what to send to Iraq in support of any US campaign coming. I support this, and if need be I'll damn well cheer them on if I feel like it.


I too am too old to qualify for any enlistment or drafts, but make no mistake here..... IF it came down to guys like me having to pick up a gun and shoot some invading bastard that want's to rob us of our freedoms, like Fletchy said, I'd do it in a heartbeat. I always thought I'd make a pretty good grenade tosser too. Head's up. Boomm baby, boommmm.


so maybe tone it down on the "shut the fuck up" shit already. Bitch.

are you drunk? :glugglug

Yes, it does. That's all I'll say too.