Which would you rather have?
 

A huge network of small blogs or 1 authority site.

Same revenue and same costs. Which would you prefer?

The 1 site.

If it's same revenue and costs, definitely the one site..

One site - generally easier to manage.

One site.

With google making changes the way they are - I'd take the network of smaller blogs :2 cents:

Depends on how brandable the one site is without needing SEs.. :upsidedow

One site also

Definably, small blogs are easy to make one good site is much harder.

rather have 1 powerhouse than a bunch of shit sites assuming revenue is the same, less domain renewal fees as well :2 cents:

one good site

The man says it, although I have no choice ATM and will be running one soon.

As far as I heard most of the people here on gfy are workaholics who stick to running 300+ blogs, go figure.

one site

I think the answer is obvious...

I would rather have a large network of blogs.

I would love to have one blog that is huge and pulls in lots of money, but you can wake up one morning and all of your traffic is gone because of changes Google made. With a network of blogs your traffic is always in flux, some sites up, some sites down. etc.

So according to a lot of people, apparently one big site isn't good because it could drop from Google at any time...
Since when do real big, branded sites rely mostly on SEO to a point where it would go bankrupt without it's SE ranks? As a backup, hire someone to do CPC/CPM micro management and you won't even need SEO if you don't want it. Not to mention all of the other advertising and branding opportunities there are with one site that you can't do with massive networks.. :Oh crap