![]() |
Excited about Iraq invasion.
I'm really excited by George Bush's latest reason for bombing Iraq: he's running out of patience. And so am I! For some time now I've been really pissed off with Mr Johnson, who lives a couple of doors down the street. Well, him and Mr Patel, who runs the health food shop. They both give me queer looks, and I'm sure Mr Johnson is planning something nasty for me, but so far I haven't been able to discover what. I've been round to his place a few times to see what he's up to, but he's got everything well hidden. That's how devious he is.
As for Mr Patel, don't ask me how I know, I just know - from very good sources - that he is, in reality, a Mass Murderer. I have leafleted the street telling them that if we don't act first, he'll pick us off one by one. Some of my neighbours say, if I've got proof, why don't I go to the police? But that's simply ridiculous. The police will say they need evidence of a crime with which to charge my neighbours. They'll come up with endless red tape and quibbling about the rights and wrongs of a pre-emptive strike and all the while Mr Johnson will be finalising his plans to do terrible things to me, while Mr Patel will be secretly murdering people. Since I'm the only one in the street with a decent range of automatic firearms, I reckon it's up to me to keep the peace. But until recently that's been a little difficult. Now, however, George W. Bush has made it clear that all I need to do is run out of patience, and then I can wade in and do whatever I want! And let's face it, Mr Bush's carefully thought-out policy towards Iraq is the only way to bring about international peace and security. The one certain way to stop Muslim fundamentalist suicide bombers targeting the US or the UK is to bomb a few Muslim countries that have never threatened us. That's why I want to blow up Mr Johnson's garage and kill his wife and children. Strike first! That'll teach him a lesson. Then he'll leave us in peace and stop peering at me in that totally unacceptable way. Mr Bush makes it clear that all he needs to know before bombing Iraq is that Saddam is a really nasty man and that he has weapons of mass destruction - even if no one can find them. I'm certain I've just as much justification for killing Mr Johnson's wife and children as Mr Bush has for bombing Iraq. Mr Bush's long-term aim is to make the world a safer place by eliminating 'rogue states' and 'terrorism'. It's such a clever long-term aim because how can you ever know when you've achieved it? How will Mr Bush know when he's wiped out all terrorists? When every single terrorist is dead? But then a terrorist is only a terrorist once he's committed an act of terror. What about would-be terrorists? These are the ones you really want to eliminate, since most of the known terrorists, being suicide bombers, have already eliminated themselves. Perhaps Mr Bush needs to wipe out everyone who could possibly be a future terrorist? Maybe he can't be sure he's achieved his objective until every Muslim fundamentalist is dead? But then some moderate Muslims might convert to fundamentalism. Maybe the only really safe thing to do would be for Mr Bush to eliminate all Muslims? And what about Christian fundamentalists? Aren't they just as bad, if not worse? It's the same in my street. Mr Johnson and Mr Patel are just the tip of the iceberg. There are dozens of other people in the street who I don't like and who - quite frankly - look at me in odd ways. No one will be really safe until I've wiped them all out. My wife says I might be going too far but I tell her I'm simply using the same logic as the President of the United States. That shuts her up. Like Mr Bush, I've run out of patience, and if that's a good enough reason for the President, it's good enough for me. I'm going to give the whole street two weeks - no, 10 days - to come out in the open and hand over all the aliens and interplanetary hijackers, galactic outlaws and interstellar terrorist masterminds, and if they don't hand them over nicely and say 'Thank you', I'm going to bomb the entire street to kingdom come. It's just as sane as what George W. Bush is proposing - and, in contrast to what he's intending, my policy will only destroy one little street. |
I agree with you. Since the President is taking the correct action, you should do the same. Blow the hell out of that street. :thumbsup
|
hmmm you convinced me, sadaam is a humanitarian and has been wrongfully acceused.Iraq sounds like a nice place to raise a family, tomorrow i will give up my American citizenship...Iraq here i come
|
LOL. Good post.
|
interesting :1orglaugh
|
Liberals are so subtle.
Patience was a great virtue of Prime Minister Chamberlain. |
Great post. I luv it...
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
very eloquent, sacX..
|
sacX,
I agree with the point you're making 100% If only all the American people would realize that they're being brainwashed, the real reasons for the war would come out. I agree with disarming rogue states, but then again, isn't North Korea more dangerous than Iraq? UN inspectors have green light to inspect the shit out of Iraq, and *IF* they find weapons, they'll take them away. Hussein is no danger to the US with the UN inspectors there; North Korea IS. Jesus... |
Hey don't forget that Korean guy who lives just up the street from you. He is a known gun owner and makes a point of showcasing his guns in public. He has threatened to kill you and his family and even kill his other Korean neighbor. Let's give peace a chance with that guy instead of going for a pre emptive attack because...because being consistent is just so out of fashion.
:winkwink: |
Anologies are for simpletons that can not grasp the real issues.
|
Quote:
:1orglaugh Oh ya...you misspelled "analogies". How ironic. :Graucho |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Posting on GFY past midnight is for total, absolute losers! |
Quote:
|
Nice... very nice.
|
Quote:
:mad: |
Quote:
So you are not stupid. You just made a very ironic post which could open you up to accusations of being a simpleton. And I am not a simpleton after all. I am simply Wonton. Fear me. :glugglug |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
i post the most after midnight.
:helpme |
Quote:
Shit. Why couldn't you just post some arrogant comeback? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I am simply Wonton. Fear me. :glugglug |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
stick to something you know, like spamming :2 cents:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Meriam Webster Online Dictionary "One entry found for YA. Main Entry: YA Function: abbreviation young adult " :1orglaugh Oops. Wrong icon. I meant: :321GFY Nah. It's actually funny: :1orglaugh |
Where can I get a "Kill a Muslim for Dubya" bumpersticker ?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
that's not original material..it's just from an email i got forwarded today.. Didn't think anyone would read it because of all the 1million post stuff going on :)
Saw this story in the paper today, how US atmospheric tests are responsible for 11,000 deaths in the United States.. damn WMD :( http://www.enn.com/news/2003-02-12/s_2621.asp |
sacX!
I guess you already signed and delivered for the armed services right>? Ever thought about whats gonna happen to your business while youre fighting for us? |
Quote:
heh. |
what GWB and his crew don't care about is that this kind of action just breeds more resentment around the world and therefore more people who want to attack US interests. Does anyone want to argue that there are LESS people who want to attack the US now than there were before Sept 11?
Wouldn't it be smarter to at least *appear* to be just and democratic? I'd sign up for the armed services if there was a just cause, I'm a medic so I know what i'd be doing. As for my business it would do a hell of a lot better without the "geo-political instability" that Bush is creating with threat after threat. |
Comparing apples and oranges. Why waste your time writing that when it has nothing to do with anything except you got domestic problems with a neighbor. Saddam's mindset has the potential to kill thousands of people. Not only that, one stray nuke set off any where in continental United States or Europe would wreck the world economy and billions of more lives including yours and mine. Do you have any idea what the impact of that is? Imagine that. How does Mr Johnson compare to that? Since you're good at telling little stories, when do you suggest the United States do something or go to war to prevent such a castrophe from happening? Do you suggest we wait until a nuke goes off before we do something? Or do you think we should wait until the terrorists go through the U.N. declaring war before we respond? Please entertain us with your answer and please make it relavent.
|
well i didn't write that I was just posting something during the million post mayhem..
Well the CIA don't think Saddam is a serious threat, and with weapon inspectors in there he can't do shit. War will kill thousands of innocent Iraqi's just like war in Iraq killed thousands of innocent Afghani's, but of course you don't give a shit about them Quite simply I think the US should get a resolution through the U.N. Stop buying the propaganda that is sold to you. Why would Saddam set off a nuke? he has no reason to, or he had no reason to until GWB starts invading his country. Bigfish why don't you answer the questions in my previous post. Do more people like the US now or before Sept 11? Do the US espouse freedom, democracy and justice purely when it suits them? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Interesting. Makes me think of a little guy called Hitler and his issue with the jewish people... Anyone else? |
Hey SacX, nice. But you also have new "laws" on your street. the "Patriotic Street Act?. You can use that to get the FBI to do your dirty work. It worked in the 50's against the " threat" of the Hollywood communism ...
Just go to this link,: https://tips.fbi.gov/ Please note that it is a secure server.... |
Quote:
|
All together now . . .
Put any song on repeat for long enough and people will eventually start humming. Although this popular tune denies logic (inspections are working, Iraq is totally hamstrung) and the facts (no weapons have been found) the official lies have swayed public opinion in more than one country. But the cover has frayed badly, and even most hawks now admit the obvious: this is a straight-up resource war, for oil. Pessimists who warned that the 21st century would be a century of resource wars ? for energy, for water, for fertile land ? look scarily prescient as the US digs in around Iraq?s mighty oil reserves The Bush administration is chock-full of veteran oil industry heavyweights, all well-versed in global energy trends. They all know the world is about to enter the downside of global oil production. They know US dependence on foreign oil will rise to as much as 70 percent in coming years. They know Iraq sits on the world?s second-largest untapped oil fields. For them, this war is about staking out valuable turf prior to the chaos likely to accompany the looming era of ?permanent oil shock.? The Prague Pill |
Quote:
|
**
Over 38,000 people in 44 nations were surveyed regarding attitudes toward: Their Lives Their Countries The World America Interesting links.... http://people-press.org/reports/disp...3?ReportID=165 http://www.pewtrusts.com/pdf/vf_pew_..._attitudes.pdf Quote:
|
Quote:
How about this.. anyone that goes to bed before midnight is an absolute loser without an evening "social" life :Graucho. Hows that for generalizations wonton? :1orglaugh |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:53 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123