protesters demand right to shoot at the police:
 

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/...sts/56470926/1

The second shooting occurred Sunday when officers spotted a suspected gang member in a stolen sport utility vehicle. A brief pursuit ended when three people jumped from the vehicle and ran. Joel Mathew Acevedo, 21, fired at an officer and the officer shot and killed him, authorities said.

So he shot at a cop, the cop took him out, and people are upset why? Because he lost?

The other one sounds pretty bad if true. shot in the back of the head while running away :(

It's always funny how they are quick to blame the cops. In the original case, the man was a career criminal and well known gang member who was most likely selling heroin... Police approached them and he fled. At a certain point in time the police officer felt threatened.

Whatever. Break some more windows at Starbucks to make yourself feel better.

I say it again, fuck the police!

"While most protesters were peaceful, some appeared to be outsiders who "were prone to violence and wanted to incite" both the crowd and police, Dunn said."


But wait, I thought it was all concerned citizens.

Any excuse for a riot.

you know there is a real 'conspiracy' going on that is threating our very way of life and you can't see it because you are busy chasing the 'Illuminati' of some of dumb shit. fucking brilliant :2 cents::1orglaugh

I have no idea. I was not there.

Since the Lakers didn't win the championship, they needed something to riot over... :winkwink:

Never forget.

Ok ok wait before I say.. Can they shoot back?

We already have the right to shoot at police. That is the entire point of the second amendment. To protect us FROM agents of government should the need arise.

"feeling threatened" as a standard for deadly force is clearly ridiculous.

George nails it every time.