Manwin Bought Evil Angel?
 

A lesser site (than mine ) is reporting that Manwin has bought Evil Angel. I have heard this rumor but in my mind it is wildly speculative. Not that Manwin wouldn't want EA but that I don't see john Stagliano selling it.

Still its a possibility...anyone else heard anything or know anything for sure?

nope, have'nt heard a peep ..............

If the story is true..... I would re-think this statement

As much as you been up Manwins ass. The couldn't fart without you getting wind of it :thumbsup

:1orglaugh

LOL hey thing is you wouldnt believe all the manwin stuff I hear but I try to vet it out before running it....and if that site is right Id give em kudos....sorta

but remember its consistency even a broken clock is right twice a day

hmmmmmm and another one bites the dust?

Congrats to the winners!

Manwin should be hated here just as much as .XXX

RIP gammae.

Sounds pretty definitive to me - the Buttman denied Manwin (as long as that is an official source).

http://stdcarriers.com/images/carrie...manHustler.jpg

Hard to believe it's been 15 years since John was diagnosed with HIV...I hope that he remains independent.

ADG

Maybe it was the alternative since they couldn't get SleazyDreams? :1orglaugh

Thats what i thought...nothing to see here move along...TY for the link

https://twitter.com/EvilAngelVideo/s...25673418190849

good, didn't sell out to manlose

Isn't that how it always starts, by denying the rumor?

And they probably won't "buy" many more people. There will be mergers. There are anti-trust laws in place for such things.

That said, maybe the wrong question is being asked. Will there be a Manwin / Evil Angel merger of any kind, or has Manwin purchased a stake in the company?

Splitting hairs by definition, I know, but so do they when it comes to content theft and some previous business transactions.

Read this article and you see it makes perfect sense.

http://www.google.com/transparencyre...ains/h33t.com/

Until the mid 2000s very few decent DVD producers were selling out to anyone online. The reason is simple, online couldn't or wouldn't pay enough to compete with what they were earning. Now that's turned around and offline porn is slowly dying for most.

For a cash rich company in online porn to ignore this is frankly, stupid. These offline companies have archives of great porn, a brand name that means something and the production know how to produce porn a step up from what most online companies do.

Online offers the knowledge of getting and selling to traffic.

The only question is the price or a deal.

I thought the same thing.

Never saw Google Transparency before - looks like it could be useful.

Thanks for sharing! :thumbsup

ADG

They are buying up everything so why not.
I dont see how they stay organized so well, you have to admit, they have their shit buttoned down tight.

Strange times we are in to see one of the owners of AVN getting 1000s of DMCA take down notices.

:helpme

I think EA is differently organized then most studios. Buying them might not automatically give you access to their producers content.

This.


Aren't most of EA's producer sites through Gamma?

.....

Thats why I was skeptical all EA producers own their content EA just distributes it so buying EA doesnt buy anyones catalog not even buttmans I dont think

I believe that is correct. But it would give them more distribution power under, should they need it.

This is normal for the DVD business. Producers often sell"licenses" and not out right. That way we made more money and kept ownership of what we produce. EA are a distribution label, so do they have the rights to sell the content to Manwin and do they have the license to sell it online?

***************************
Still yet again I fucked up. :Oh crap

I posted before and put the wrong URL for people to read. Here it is again and done right.

Read this article and you see it makes perfect sense.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/culture/20...et-killed-porn

Until the mid 2000s very few decent DVD producers were selling out to anyone online. The reason is simple, online couldn't or wouldn't pay enough to compete with what they were earning. Now that's turned around and offline porn is slowly dying for most.

For a cash rich company in online porn to ignore this is frankly, stupid. These offline companies have archives of great porn, a brand name that means something and the production know how to produce porn a step up from what most online companies do.

Online offers the knowledge of getting and selling to traffic.

The only question is the price or a deal.

That's actually a really bad way to judge uploading.com's pirate-ness. Since uploading.com's site can not be searched then Google is going to index very few pages. The only pages Google would index would be the public stuff, support, contact, etc.

The organizations reporting uploading.com urls to Google are only inflating their numbers by reporting those URLs which would never show up in Google's index anyway. (You can report ANY URL to Google regardless if its showing up in their search or not).

So while the number might seem high, it's actually a drop in the bucket of the true number of infringements on uploading.com, any anti-piracy company worth their rate would report those URLs to uploading.com, not Google.

This made me LOL.

Not sure if I should just let this one die as it only gives Manwin more publicity over a fake rumor :winkwink:

But, that being said, Buttman/John wouldn't let go his company and passion just like that.
There hasn't even been discussion on the subject between the companies, as the twitter reference shows !

To answer some of you, yes Evil Angel has an exclusive deal with Gamma Entertainement, as well as with their multiple directors. We handle all their sites and are available for promotion under Famedollars.com.

So, that's that, false rumor, back to business :thumbsup