vps comparison, which better for high?traffic wp blogs?
 

We :D have couple of wp blogs, two of them gets around 20-30k unique's a day, but I'd like to have hosting ready to open much more blogs and wp traffic of around 50-75k. Ofc I'm planning to use cache plugins :)

I've found these two by recommendation (hostv) and quite good experience (amerinoc/phatservers).

how vz2 [http://www.hostv.com/vps-server.shtml] compares with
AMNOC-MVPS1 [https://www.amerinoc.com/managedvps.php] and are they enough in specs (ram and cpu) to keep those 50-75k wp blogs network running nice and smooth?

I'm also open for others hosts if you've got good experience with them, we're speaking about managed vps's :D

Those sound like some nice traffic blogs. Congrats on your success.

:thumbsup

i would go with a dedicated over vps

if you have blogs with such traffic you must be making enough money to go for dedicated.. so why be cheap? :)

not even 1 ? ; ]

CaptainWolfy: cutting costs is important :)

I'd shell out the extra twenty bucks for the AMNOC-MVPS2. That's AmeriNOC's best VPS deal for price/specs I think.

dedicated server is always better but if you are gonna go VPS I suggest using nginx as a reverse proxy to apache. it will let you squeeze extra performance out of a vps

VPS is not good for high traffic sites.
Maybe in a few years, but right now, physical server is much better.

yes and for it to be any type of good, you would need to increase the amount of resources, which could get quite pricey for the amount you would spend on the more resources you could get a dedicated with loads of bandwidth.

you should try vps.net since it allows you to scale quicker if needed...

Put in an extra $50 and get a dedicated.

i would suggest a dedicated server.

I had a forum with 11000 daily users on HostV vps. Was a bloody nightmare, vps crashed all the time, support kept on demanding upgrade to dedicated.
Movies it to wiredtree vps and life is perfectly fine now

If you still want a VPS, check my sig for a good price.