GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Looks Like Iran is ON: (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1055820)

MediaGuy 02-01-2012 10:56 AM

Looks Like Iran is ON:
 
We don't get this type of news here dammit:

http://www.panarmenian.net/eng/news/...th_of_Horm uz

Quote:

While U.S. Preisdent Barack Obama?s supporters hailed his withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq as the end of the war in the middle east, behind the scenes the Pentagon has been quietly massing troops and armaments on two islands located just south of the Strait of Hormuz, and within easy striking distance of Iran, infowars.com reported.

In addition to some 50,000 U.S. troops currently in the region waiting for orders (apparently they won?t be home by this past Christmas as was originally promised), Obama is deploying an additional 50,000 soldiers to be ready for ?any contingency? by
Dagnabbit!

:D

PR_Glen 02-01-2012 11:07 AM

an armenian site who got it from infowars? classy.

porno jew 02-01-2012 11:13 AM

it's been "around the corner" for the last decade. don't be such a sheep.

PenisFace 02-01-2012 11:16 AM

The US can't afford to hit Iran with ground troops, anyone who thinks otherwise is crazy. Unlike with Iraq, the Iranians aren't actually all that bad at fighting. Precision airstrikes from far away will knock out any key targets and that will be that.

seeandsee 02-01-2012 11:25 AM

they are taking country by country , so IRan will come one day to serve them

CrocMint 02-01-2012 05:56 PM

No wonder Armenia is worrying about this - they have common borders with Iran :(

mizmiz 02-01-2012 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PenisFace (Post 18726441)
The US can't afford to hit Iran with ground troops, anyone who thinks otherwise is crazy. Unlike with Iraq, the Iranians aren't actually all that bad at fighting. Precision airstrikes from far away will knock out any key targets and that will be that.

lol your so dumb.

Rochard 02-01-2012 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PenisFace (Post 18726441)
The US can't afford to hit Iran with ground troops, anyone who thinks otherwise is crazy. Unlike with Iraq, the Iranians aren't actually all that bad at fighting. Precision airstrikes from far away will knock out any key targets and that will be that.

Let me see if I understand this correctly...

Iran and Iraq fought for ten years and no one won. The US bitch smacked Iraq in thirty days.

What in the world makes you think Iran can stand on it's own two legs, no less fight a war with the US? Iran can't even produce it's own fucking gas. It's military is in horrible shape, it has trouble keeping their planes flying, and it's Navy depends on the US to rescue it's own citizens. Did you notice how when the USS Abraham Lincoln entered the Strait of Hormuz - after being warned by Iran not to - that Iran shut it's mouth up quickly?

directfiesta 02-01-2012 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mizmiz (Post 18728596)
lol your so dumb.

lol... you are so ... zionist ..

Rochard 02-01-2012 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MediaGuy (Post 18726288)
We don't get this type of news here dammit:

http://www.panarmenian.net/eng/news/...th_of_Horm uz

Dagnabbit!

:D

It's called "pre-positioned".

The US has a policy of building up and pre-positioning gear in place in areas of potential conflict, and then just flying in troops and using gear already in place. It's a lot cheaper and a lot quicker than having to fly everything in.

There are entire bases that do this - like Diego Garcia.

At the same time, it's a lot cheaper to leave the gear behind too. Why move everything back to the United States when there is a good chance we'll need it there again.

brassmonkey 02-01-2012 06:51 PM

bring it on!

BIGTYMER 02-01-2012 07:05 PM

Glad I've been buying US defense stocks.

I'll be in bad shape if the warmachine ever stops.

JFK 02-01-2012 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIGTYMER (Post 18728635)
Glad I've been buying US defense stocks.

I'll be in bad shape if the warmachine ever stops.

I was watching the history of the "Rothschilds" the other day, they would be in the same boat:winkwink:

BFT3K 02-01-2012 08:28 PM

The false flag "Iranian" terrorist attack on the US is coming!

Then they can rally the sheeple, to justify the next step on the "war on terror".

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/6361/85292491.jpg

Bet on it!

campimp 02-01-2012 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 18728606)
The US bitch smacked Iraq in thirty days.

that sure was a long 30 days

DBS.US 02-01-2012 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIGTYMER (Post 18728635)
Glad I've been buying US defense stocks.

I'll be in bad shape if the warmachine ever stops.

What's a good US defense stock to watch?

Rochard 02-01-2012 09:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 18728722)
The false flag "Iranian" terrorist attack on the US is coming!

Then they can rally the sheeple, to justify the next step on the "war on terror".

http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/6361/85292491.jpg

Bet on it!

I love that graphic...

Rochard 02-01-2012 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by campimp (Post 18728753)
that sure was a long 30 days

The war was between the Iraqi government and it's military and the United States. Pretty much Iraq folded quickly.

adendreams 02-01-2012 09:24 PM

you guys think we would put boots into Iran? Not gunna happen. Ever

Some tactical strikes against their nuke sites, maybe..full scale invasion? not a chance

Unlike Iraq they are a serious country with a serious military - and the Iranian people would go apeshit - even the ones who hate their government. Iran would kick our ass if any US soldiers set foot in that place.

dgraves 02-01-2012 09:33 PM

occupying iran has always been part of the plan. they can't build a pipeline around it so they have to go through it.

the middle east conflict is about oil, not terrorism. we tried to claim iraq had weapons of mass destruction but when the UN couldn't find them, we had to figure out another threat, hence 9/11.

now that we have iraq pretty much buttoned up, it's time to make iran look like a threat so we can occupy in order to start pipeline construction. this has been the plan from the beginning.

BIGTYMER 02-01-2012 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DBS.US (Post 18728757)
What's a good US defense stock to watch?

GD - General Dynamics
NOC - Northrop Grumman
HII - Huntington Ingalls (Just a few months ago NOC split up there ship building into HII. Made me a ton of money. If I recall correctly it was a 2:1 stock split.)
RTN - Raytheon
LMT - Lockheed Martin
TDY - Teledyne Technologies

Heavy hitters. In no real order.

Dcat 02-01-2012 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 18726368)
an armenian site who got it from infowars? classy.

What's wrong with infowars.com?

You'll hear more truth there in a day than you'll find sifting through all the lame stream media horse shit in a year. :2 cents:

moeloubani 02-01-2012 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 18728794)
I dunno about that. Iran's population was 60 million when they fought a decade long war with Iraq (20 million) ending in a stalemate. We took Iraq in less then 100 days?

All I know is if I was Iran and saw how American troops slaughtered my enemy neighbor in a short period of time, I'd be nervous.

You can't define winning a war by the time it takes to occupy the area. You have to take into consideration how much easier it is to fight a guerilla style campaign against an organized military than it is to go head to head with them in open war.

Iraq was taken so quickly because the people that were fighting were patient and waited for the US to settle in. Now look at the situation in Iraq, at one time the top terrorist there Muqtada Al-Sadr is now a big part of their government, there is still ongoing violence and they are still extremely anti-American. They are worse than when the US went in.

theking 02-02-2012 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by campimp (Post 18728753)
that sure was a long 30 days

The military defeated their military...toppled Sadam and overthrew the Bathist Government in 24 days.

moeloubani 02-02-2012 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus H Christ (Post 18728909)
Well to define "winning" you also must share similar objectives. Before the US invaded, 10% of Iraqis oil was exported to the US, now 80%. The goal was not to simply overthrow the government, as this did happen, but to secure a source of oil to minimize others financial industrial growth by occupying energy. As this is also happened.

Fair enough but that took more than 100 days to accomplish.

buzzard 02-02-2012 12:22 AM

Iran is an issue every time we have a democratic president.
Go ahead and feel tough to other countries. They are made of human beings, just like you.
Once Ron Paul is elected, wars and Iran will disappear :2 cents:

Dirty F 02-02-2012 12:23 AM

Just what the world needs.

Joshua G 02-02-2012 12:41 AM

knock off pakistan, iran, syria & israel, there will be peace.

LiveDose 02-02-2012 01:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mizmiz (Post 18728596)
lol your so dumb.

How ironic.

BFT3K 02-02-2012 08:45 AM



https://youtube.com/watch?v=ybZ0d2WJw5Q

Just Alex 02-02-2012 08:46 AM

jews are going to be thrilled.

DarkJedi 02-02-2012 09:03 AM

A huge ass US Aegis Cruiser came to our seaport a few days ago (Black Sea). It's on board missiles can reach Iran from here.

But it's leaving tomorrow i think. (it's so cold here, it almost got frozen in place, rofl)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Vella_Gulf_%28CG-72%29

potter 02-02-2012 09:12 AM

WTF do you mean we won't get that kind of news here? This is already old news in the states.

http://abcnews.go.com/International/...9#.Tyq1mSPQ9ss

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/s...ait/52764150/1

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/...rMQ_story.html

http://www.denverpost.com/war/ci_19805176

^ All from a WEEK ago. You Canadians are slow at getting your news eh?

porno jew 02-02-2012 09:13 AM

it's in the best interest for all parties involved to beat the drums to keep oil prices high, among other things.

brassmonkey 02-02-2012 09:15 AM

im waiting

potter 02-02-2012 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by porno jew (Post 18730211)
it's in the best interest for all parties involved to beat the drums to keep oil prices high, among other things.

Actually it's to keep oil prices down. Iran threatened to take out transports through the straight of hormuz, so we and many other allies have sent ships and troops there. Man you conspiracy nuts are idiots.

Also, nothing will come of it. Just as Iran has done for the past thirty years - they beat their chest like a moronic 8 year old throwing a hissy fit. They won't actually do anything, however as oil is a big economic factor, we have to abide and show that we won't stand for it by sending ships/troops there for protection. We can't just let Iran bluff all the time.

Also for all you kiddies who seem to always think war is upon us, specially when it comes to Iran. This shit has been happening with Iran for literally thirty years. I know it's fun to think your time on this earth is special and something new is happening but it's not. This same thing happened last year, the year before that, and so on. And it will happen again next year and the year after that.

So calm down and shut the fuck up. Thank you. :winkwink:

porno jew 02-02-2012 09:20 AM

you missed my point.

Quote:

Originally Posted by potter (Post 18730228)
Actually it's to keep oil prices down. Iran threatened to take out transports through the straight of hormuz, so we and many other allies have sent ships and troops there. Man you conspiracy nuts are idiots.

Also, nothing will come of it. Just as Iran has done for the past thirty years - they beat their chest like a moronic 8 year old throwing a hissy fit. They won't actually do anything, however as oil is a big economic factor, we have to abide and show that we won't stand for it by sending ships/troops there for protection. We can't just let Iran bluff all the time.

Also for all you kiddies who seem to always think war is upon us, specially when it comes to Iran. This shit has been happening with Iran for literally thirty years. I know it's fun to think your time on this earth is special and something new is happening but it's not. This same thing happened last year, the year before that, and so on. And it will happen again next year and the year after that.

So calm down and shut the fuck up. Thank you. :winkwink:


ajrocks 02-02-2012 09:22 AM

If there is oil, the US will come!

jerryb 02-02-2012 09:31 AM

If Obama thinks he is going to lose his second term in office he will do something major like a strike on Iran to gain votes as a powerful leader. It has happened many times before just before an election and will probably happen again. Many lives will be lost if he thinks the election is lost in the last few days before election day. Mark my word on this.

PastorSinAlot 02-02-2012 09:32 AM

blow iran the fuck up

BFT3K 02-02-2012 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jerryb (Post 18730260)
If Obama thinks he is going to lose his second term in office he will do something major like a strike on Iran to gain votes as a powerful leader. It has happened many times before just before an election and will probably happen again. Many lives will be lost if he thinks the election is lost in the last few days before election day. Mark my word on this.

ALL US Presidents are just fucking hand puppets for the scumbags that puppeteer the planet, so he may not have a choice in the matter.

Most on the left would be more likely to stay home on voting day, than to re-elect a war monger. Bombing Iran for political gain, would be counterproductive at best.

PR_Glen 02-02-2012 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dcat (Post 18728787)
What's wrong with infowars.com?

You'll hear more truth there in a day than you'll find sifting through all the lame stream media horse shit in a year. :2 cents:

because i can go to the guardian uk, i can go to cnn, i can go to canoe or bbc, i can even go to fox news and read a story, filter out the bullshit and propaganda, make a sound decision based on a subject and form my own opinion. If i, instead, go to alternative news websites I'm flooded with FANATICS who take microns of facts and data and ride the slippery slope into a story that equates to science fiction in most peoples eyes instead of reality.

Now i'm not saying that the news sites i check out don't have their share of bs stories, political serving articles and distraction fluff, but they at least make an effort to hold a standard of waiting to hear all the facts before they come out with a story, they don't ever write stories based on assumption, which I find common on sites such as infowars.

If you think i'm wrong explain, i haven't checked out that site in a long time.

_Richard_ 02-02-2012 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dcat (Post 18728787)
What's wrong with infowars.com?

You'll hear more truth there in a day than you'll find sifting through all the lame stream media horse shit in a year. :2 cents:

did u just reference sarah palin?

2ndxachrm 02-02-2012 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIGTYMER (Post 18728779)
GD - General Dynamics
NOC - Northrop Grumman
HII - Huntington Ingalls (Just a few months ago NOC split up there ship building into HII. Made me a ton of money. If I recall correctly it was a 2:1 stock split.)
RTN - Raytheon
LMT - Lockheed Martin
TDY - Teledyne Technologies

Heavy hitters. In no real order.

GD is in RI Big ass place

Paul 02-02-2012 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 18730306)
because i can go to the guardian uk, i can go to cnn, i can go to canoe or bbc, i can even go to fox news and read a story, filter out the bullshit and propaganda, make a sound decision based on a subject and form my own opinion. If i, instead, go to alternative news websites I'm flooded with FANATICS who take microns of facts and data and ride the slippery slope into a story that equates to science fiction in most peoples eyes instead of reality.

Now i'm not saying that the news sites i check out don't have their share of bs stories, political serving articles and distraction fluff, but they at least make an effort to hold a standard of waiting to hear all the facts before they come out with a story, they don't ever write stories based on assumption, which I find common on sites such as infowars.

If you think i'm wrong explain, i haven't checked out that site in a long time.

Nice post :thumbsup


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123