UK to dispatch warship to Falklands
 

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e75c05a4-4...#axzz1l4CJ9elj

lets hope its not sunk as we only have 2 or so these days

Wait we still have a navy? I thought we sold it to pay for bankers bonuses?

it said we have3 6 boats or somthing today.

its all to do with defending an airbase. apparently if its taken there is nothing we can do.

by the way, this is about oil.

As a Brit I can't understand why anybody gives a flying fuck about the Falklands.

Resources.

And sheep.

I think is a strategic spot for a future world war 3 and world domination

Britain already did the world domination thing.. it didn't really work out.. :winkwink:

This almost feels like a retro flashback thread or something though.. are there seriously issues with the Falklands again??!! :warning

(Disclaimer for lack of knowledge on topic: I haven't lived in UK for 14+ years)

I think we can hazard a guess....

What's this going to be your 4th or 5th prediction of a false flag operation that doesn't ever happen. Seems like you don't know what's coming. :2 cents:

yeah it is indeed about oil! but it is quite clear to a neutral observer like myself that it is the UK that is right and the Argentinians that all of a sudden want to get falklands back because they found oil

Argentina obviously is acting really immature and irresponsible. The UK has no choice but to make it clear they are serious. I don't think the UK wants another falklands war but it is not too clear if Argentina feels the same. They make it look like they are willing to take over Falklands by force if they are not given the oil money.


:2 cents:

there has been some talk back and forwards about falklands for quite some time. Argentina even said they wanted to use slogans on all their Olympic jerseys this summer in London

slogans like "malvinas argentina" or something , basically saying that falklands = malvinas = argentina .. quite the provocation considering that the olympics are in london

I think Argentina needs to shut the fuck up if it believes in democracy. The people that actually live on the falklands have no desire to be part of Argentina

Uk's stance always has been very clear. The people that live on Falklands can decide for themselves if they want to be part of UK or part of Argentina. If time and time again they vote pro UK and against Argentina it seems quite clear what they want..

Argentina is blinded by the possible oil $$$ and really wants it. They are a threat to stability in that region right now :2 cents:

your ignorance on the subject surpasses mine about the mysteries of the Kabalah. In 2 paragraphs you had 3 absolute errors and several arguable opinions to say the least. That must be kind of a record! :thumbsup

btw, I live in Argentina and admit there's some kind of political move for the masses, but in all honesty, I couldn't care less about who keeps that shit hole. Its only use is for geo strategic reasons and Argentina can only throw stones, so it's not like this is a NEED for Argentina, just the historical claim for invaded land

LOL.

you obviously are blinded by your own countries propaganda.. you should read some more on the subject by both sides .. not just your country's side

I am a neutral observer. I am not from the UK and am not from Argentina.

What rights does your country over that land? Have you looked at a map? Do you know the history? It is so ridiculous to have this discussion when it is so obvious what is going on.

Argentina has never once in history had a legitimate claim to that land. Argentina has no history on that land. Argentina only sees $$$. :2 cents:

As always, Argentina is already #winning ...

http://semanacincuentaydos.files.wor...temayo1982.jpg

You people love to stir shit up:

< Yahoo News Link >

This dispute has been going on for some time, and Argentina needs to let it go. Sorry, but possession is nine tenths of the law, the UK has had possession for at least the past thirty years, and the last time Argentina tried to do anything about it they got bitch smacked pretty hard.

assholes

1) http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comanda...las_M alvinas (sorry no English version, use Google translate. Anyway, it simply tells the history of the Islas Malvinas as a province of Argentina) Jorge Pacheco and Luis Vernet were the governors of (according to you)... nowhere :Oh crap And UK had to invade the place because nobody was there. You're making ALL THE SENSE! :D
2) Argentina COULD see $$$, but in all reality all the oil belongs of Argentina belongs to private companies including... BP
3) You say Argentina is interested just now because oil was discovered... well, sorry to burst your bubble but Argentina made claims to the occupied land for more than a century. There even was a war, something you seem to ignore :Oh crap
4) oil was discovered in late 70s. Yet, up to date, not a single drop was extracted. Go figure. Then, just by doing a little tiny bit of research, it seems oil is scarce and/or too expensive to extract. This is all from UK documents, just in case you have any doubt, but even if you don't believe it, tell me: If oil was found in late 70s and England even invaded countries to get oil, then why didn't they extract it safely from Malvinas/Falklands/shithole? After all, according to you, it's so plenty of oil that Argentina discovered a special interest on it :1orglaugh
5) The right of Argentina over Malvinas is recognized by most countries that the right of UK over them. Yeah, I know, everybody is stupid and they don't know something you know. Because they're blinded by the almighty powerful Argentina propaganda, which is a sum of CIA+Mossad+MI6+KGB+Anonymous+Big Brother that is fooling everybody :1orglaugh
6) the real subject isn't Malvinas (which UK couldn't care less) but Anctartica. But well, reality is what happens when you're doing something else
7) Now the truth: every single time Argentina government wants to distract the locals' public opinion, they get the "Malvinas case" out to unite people against those mean evil British pirates. And there are really serious issues going on right now to divert opinion to that subject. But in all reality, nobody really gives a fuck, for what we care Malvinas could disappear in the ocean and nobody will say shit

Really? Why?

Because the US took over.


We need the Falklands Islands cause after the revolution that where we are going to send the monarchy and the toffs.

Yeah. I thought you sold them to Canada...

:D

Like Napoleon.

Dont worry the US will protect it's little brother.

Considering the big amount of Argentine Webmasters that are in GFY, I can't believe nobody jumped into this thread to talk about MALVINAS. Quite strange if you ask me.

Anyway, if you think that it will ruin your reputation because for example a British Webmaster won't buy you a design (for example user H3ads), you are dead wrong man.

What a crazy nazi female did (Margareth Tatcher) has nothing to do, as to what webmaters do nowadays.

After all it was a political fight for a drunk Bastard like Galtieri (Argentina Dictator Fucker in 1982) and a over-drug and drunk UGLY lesbian like Margareth Tatcher.

And that fact is not going to prevent British and Argentine webmasters to do business. Any smart person will understand that. And if they don't then, it makes no sense to do business with that person anyways. You are saving a lot of headaches.

For example, I'm sure Argentine webmasters have no bad feelings with NIKKI, the chilean tranny, because her country SOLD Secret information to Great Britain during the MALVINAS WAR, right? And I'm sure NIKKI has many argentine friends. You see?

And altough MALVINAS belong to Argentina, it makes no sense to add more DEATHS for a piece of land. After all it will always belong to Argentina, and maybe in 30-40 years, they can slowly buld Sovereignity by transporting more and more people there.

It makes no sense to add more deaths to that history, although im completely sure Argentine government won't allow any OIL expeditions that affect their interest. One way or another, they will find a way to block that expedition, even if it has already started. There are still many interests between both countries.

Who gives a fuck?

There will be a revolution here but it won't be the monarchy that'll fall.

Isn't that a little like saying the Roman Empire didn't work out because it didn't last forever either?

For well over 300 years, the Brits had a good run for their money by any definition.


You might be on to something there :1orglaugh

Si sos de pergamino, Buenos Aires, ciudad rural, no sé por que pones esa imagen.

Para un argentino no hay nada peor que otro argentino.

Por cierto, ¿les hacés muchos diseños a los Británicos?

Después de todo, lo que dije te beneficia a vos. O a lo mejor no entendiste nada.

Por cierto, que opinás de Margaret Tatcher? Jugáte, y quedáte tranquilo que lo que digas no te sacará trabajo de Británicos. Dale, tene un poquito de cojones y dá tu opinión.

just look a little over your posts :2 cents:

ah, y felicitaciones por tu trabajo en la SIDE. Como era de esperarse de cualquier aprendiz de espía, un fracaso absoluto, pero que te pinta de cuerpo entero.

Ironic, but agree, we should have invested more in the military over the last 13 years and not paid scum like you so many benefits.

Will Canada make similar claims over Alaska based purely on geography ?

Hmmmm or maybe even Russia :)

Alaska was SOLD to US by Russia. But don't let reality get in your way :thumbsup

Des sous-marins mate, in fact a guy from Chicoutimi died if i'm not mistaken...
I wonder who the fuck ordered this ?
I'm sure he got a great commission...
Gang de crosseurs :321GFY

assholes

Yeah in 1867, so how is that relevant to countries claiming territories in 2012 based on geography ? At least the Ruskies did actually "OWN" the place at one point in time.

yeah well, it was Argentina's territory until 1833 when it was invaded and occupied by England, do a search for "Comandancia Política y Militar de las islas Malvinas" and learn. Or explain me why did England invade an empty territory :upsidedow

and it's not like England didn't invade countries throughout its history. I mean... it was the norm for centuries, so don't know wtf are you talking about. But again, don't let reality get in your path, la la land is way funnier

We invaded it cos it was EMPTY I guess. Would you call that an invasion ? But once again I ask you what happened 200 years ago has to do with claims that countries are now making in 2012 that they have the right to territories on the basis of geography ?

England has never invaded another country never ever. But don't let reality "get in your path" !

anyway, to summarize:
1) someone posts a link to a registered only page :upsidedow
2) the page says something different, which is supported by the fact that.. Argentina doesn't even have a working military force right now :error
3) then some people with no clue whatsoever started to talk as if they knew something, despite they couldn't back up a single thing :helpme
4) then some retard who tried to look as the super spy said a bunch of... well, retard things, what else? :Oh crap
5) then someone who doesn't even know anything about ANY country in the world compared an invasion to a sale. :1orglaugh
6) then I wasted time trying to argue and backing things up with documents and publicly accessible information: I'm the biggest retard in this thread :(
6) in short... this thread is full of win! :thumbsup

http://mozlo.com/gfy/full_of_win_2001.jpg

Was this an attempt to post personal information??

Well done :thumbsup


.

someone says Nikki?

About Antarctica, Chile is building a new Military base 80kms more close to the pole and closer to the USA bases... I think they have something between hands

WORLD WAR 3 IS COMING!

nah... we like to start world wars in the balklands

Are we going to have another 15 min war on our hands??

Anyone ask theking what they are doing yet? I'm sure his connections at the Pentagon could clear it up for everyone.

latest news is that they are now sending a nuke suberine.

lets hope they do not smash it up.

in the last few years they ran one into rocks and another hit another suberine as they were so silent they did not hear each other.

Very well explained! That's what it is :thumbsup

http://abhisays.com/wp-content/uploa...od-goal-tn.jpg

Lest we forget.

Dirty cheating little coked up fucker.

Let's back up here a little bit.

Seems to me that in 1765 the islands were claimed by the British. Also seems to me that Argentina wasn't even a country at that time; I don't know my South American history that well but it seems to me that in the early 1800s Argentina was owned by Spain? In the 1820s the country that was to become Argentina granted the entire chain of islands to one man, even though there were British settlers on the island.

So I utterly fail to see how Argentina has any claim here what so ever. It was claimed by the British long before Argentina was even a country, and when Argentina did lay claim to it the main island had British settlers on it. Seems to me Argentina is the one who invaded. And all of this is pointless because possession is in fact nine tenths of the law, and the British occupy the island.

Setting the dispute aside, it's comical how the military of governments just went to see in search of new islands and claimed them for their own country.